• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参考互联网上的卫生与死亡——腐朽、腐烂、半衰期、恶化和腐败。

Reference Hygiene and Death on the Internet - Decay, Rot, Half-Life, Deterioration, and Corruption.

机构信息

School of Engineering, Mercer University, Macon, GA, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00082.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2021.00082
PMID:35281707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8896816/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

References for medical articles are not always retrievable. This eliminates the ability to check on the validity of statements, methodologies, data collection, and conclusions.

METHODS

References of review, scientific, and research articles published in the 2019 and 2020 were evaluated for ability to retrieve the reference cited.

RESULTS

Ninety-five articles with 2,424 references were evaluated. There were 1,025 (1,025/2,424 = 42.3%) open access versus 1,399 (1,399/2,424 = 47.7%) paywall articles. There were 357 (14.7%) citations unavailable (misreference) due to bad, broken, or nonexistent links and wrong article, abstract or citation only, and missing citations.

CONCLUSION

Loss of reference existence or retrievability is a scientific hazard. Science is self-correcting but is doomed to not knowing what was said or discovered when references are no longer available.

摘要

背景与目的

并非所有医学文章的参考文献都可检索到。这使得人们无法核实其陈述、方法、数据收集和结论的有效性。

方法

评估了 2019 年和 2020 年发表的综述、科学和研究文章的参考文献,以确定能否检索到所引用的参考文献。

结果

评估了 95 篇文章,共 2424 条参考文献。其中,有 1025 条(1025/2424=42.3%)为开放获取文章,1399 条(1399/2424=47.7%)为付费墙文章。由于链接错误、破损或不存在,以及文章、摘要或引文仅为错误引用和缺少引文,有 357 条(14.7%)引文无法获取(引用错误)。

结论

参考文献的缺失或无法检索是一种科学风险。科学具有自我纠错功能,但当参考文献不再可用时,科学也注定无法得知之前的陈述或发现。

相似文献

1
Reference Hygiene and Death on the Internet - Decay, Rot, Half-Life, Deterioration, and Corruption.参考互联网上的卫生与死亡——腐朽、腐烂、半衰期、恶化和腐败。
JSLS. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00082.
2
Decay of references to Web sites in articles published in general medical journals: mainstream vs small journals.医学期刊文章中对网站引用的衰减:主流期刊与小期刊。
Appl Clin Inform. 2013 Oct 2;4(4):455-64. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-07-RA-0055. eCollection 2013.
3
Accuracy of references cited in articles published in Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology: a pilot study.印度皮肤病学、性病学和麻风病杂志发表文章中引用参考文献的准确性:一项初步研究。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009 Sep-Oct;75(5):488-91. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.55392.
4
The Growth of Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Orthopaedic Journals.同行评议矫形外科期刊中引用不佳文章的增长。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1727-1735. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000727.
5
Improved citation status of World Journal Gastroenterology in 2004: Analysis of all reference citations by WJG and citations of WJG articles by other SCI journals during 1998-2004.《世界胃肠病学杂志》2004年被引情况改善:对1998 - 2004年期间《世界胃肠病学杂志》的所有参考文献引用情况以及其他SCI期刊对《世界胃肠病学杂志》文章的引用情况分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan 7;11(1):1-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i1.1.
6
Citation classics in anaesthesia and pain journals: a literature review in the era of the internet.麻醉与疼痛学期刊中的经典文献:互联网时代的文献综述
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Jul;47(6):655-63. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00137.x.
7
Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.期刊中热门话题的影响因素及预测
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):343-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111209. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
8
The availability of references and the sponsorship of original research cited in pharmaceutical advertisements.药品广告中引用参考文献的可获取性及原创研究的赞助情况。
CMAJ. 2005 Feb 15;172(4):487-91. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031940.
9
Evaluating the accuracy of citations in drug promotional brochures.评估药品促销手册中引用内容的准确性。
Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Nov;28(11):1231-5. doi: 10.1177/106002809402801102.
10
Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact.推文能否预测引用量?基于推特的社会影响力指标及其与传统科学影响力指标的相关性。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 19;13(4):e123. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2012.

本文引用的文献

1
Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted.医学写作中表示数值概率的单词具有歧义并被误解。
JSLS. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00034.
2
Citation Inaccuracies in Influential Surgical Journals.有影响力的外科期刊中的引用错误。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):791-792. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1445.
3
Reference Rot in Medical Publications.医学出版物中的参考文献腐烂问题。
Ir Med J. 2018 Oct 11;111(9):827.
4
Accuracy of cited "facts" in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate.医学研究文章中引用“事实”的准确性:研究方法回顾与引用错误率重新计算
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184727. eCollection 2017.
5
Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.科学出版物中的同行评审:益处、批判及生存指南。
EJIFCC. 2014 Oct 24;25(3):227-43. eCollection 2014 Oct.
6
Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles-a systematic review and meta-analysis.医学期刊文章中的引用准确性——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PeerJ. 2015 Oct 27;3:e1364. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1364. eCollection 2015.
7
'Reference rot': a developing problem in Emergency Medicine Australasia.“参考文献轮转”:澳大利亚和新西兰急诊医学中一个日益严重的问题。
Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Oct;27(5):494. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12459. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
8
"Reference rot": does it matter?“参考文献腐烂”:这有关系吗?
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Sep;26(9):1251-2. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2707-8.
9
Scholarly context not found: one in five articles suffers from reference rot.学术环境中发现,每五篇文章中就有一篇受到参考文献失效的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115253. eCollection 2014.
10
A cross disciplinary study of link decay and the effectiveness of mitigation techniques.跨学科研究链接衰减及其缓解技术的有效性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14 Suppl 14(Suppl 14):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-S14-S5. Epub 2013 Oct 9.