• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传播立法辩论:立法者如何传达议会日程。

Disseminating legislative debates: How legislators communicate the parliamentary agenda.

作者信息

Huber Lena Maria, Bodlos Anita, Graf Elisabeth, Meyer Thomas M

机构信息

University of Vienna, Austria.

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Party Politics. 2022 Mar;28(2):365-376. doi: 10.1177/1354068820982555. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1177/1354068820982555
PMID:35281722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8905126/
Abstract

While a rich literature addresses legislative agenda-setting in multiparty democracies, relatively little is known how members of parliament disseminate the legislative agenda beyond the parliamentary floor. Drawing on content analyses of 110 legislative debates and 5,847 press releases from Austrian MPs (2013-2017), we test whether legislators are more likely to send press releases on issues that are salient to their party () and to other parties in the party system (). MPs should also communicate more on issues that fall within their area of expertise () and when they have given a speech on that issue during the legislative debate (). While we find empirical support for all these expectations, communication of the legislative agenda largely rests on each parties' issue specialists and their speakers in plenary debates. Importantly, there is no significant discrepancy overall between the actual parliamentary issue agenda and the agenda communicated by party MPs.

摘要

虽然有丰富的文献探讨多党民主制下的立法议程设定,但对于议员如何在议会之外传播立法议程,人们了解得相对较少。基于对奥地利议员在2013 - 2017年期间的110场立法辩论和5847份新闻稿的内容分析,我们检验议员是否更有可能就对其所在政党()以及政党体系中的其他政党()而言突出的问题发布新闻稿。议员还应该就属于其专业领域()的问题,以及当他们在立法辩论中就该问题发表过演讲时(),进行更多的沟通。虽然我们为所有这些预期找到了实证支持,但立法议程的传播在很大程度上依赖于各政党的问题专家及其在全会辩论中的发言人。重要的是,实际的议会问题议程与政党议员所传播的议程之间总体上没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d28d/8905126/2a3a61c09995/10.1177_1354068820982555-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d28d/8905126/0d72c8439c5d/10.1177_1354068820982555-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d28d/8905126/e239eddd5915/10.1177_1354068820982555-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d28d/8905126/2a3a61c09995/10.1177_1354068820982555-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d28d/8905126/0d72c8439c5d/10.1177_1354068820982555-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d28d/8905126/e239eddd5915/10.1177_1354068820982555-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d28d/8905126/2a3a61c09995/10.1177_1354068820982555-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Disseminating legislative debates: How legislators communicate the parliamentary agenda.传播立法辩论:立法者如何传达议会日程。
Party Politics. 2022 Mar;28(2):365-376. doi: 10.1177/1354068820982555. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
2
Abortion in democratic Spain: the parliamentary political agenda 1979-2004.民主西班牙的堕胎问题:1979 - 2004年议会政治议程
Reprod Health Matters. 2007 May;15(29):85-96. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(07)29295-X.
3
Structural elements in achieving legislative tobacco control in NSW, 1955-95: political reflections and implications.1955 - 1995年新南威尔士州实现烟草控制立法的结构要素:政治反思与影响
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006 Feb;30(1):10-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.tb00078.x.
4
Partisan Bias in Message Selection: Media Gatekeeping of Party Press Releases.信息选择中的党派偏见:政党新闻稿的媒体把关
Polit Commun. 2017 Jul 3;34(3):367-384. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1265619.
5
Political Alliance Formation and Cooperation Networks in the Utah State Legislature.犹他州立法机构中的政治联盟形成与合作网络。
Hum Nat. 2022 Mar;33(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09420-w. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Parliamentary identity and the management of the far-right: A discursive analysis of Dutch parliamentary debates.议会身份与极右翼的管理:荷兰议会辩论的话语分析。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;58(3):495-514. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12300. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Mr Speaker: The changing nature of parliamentary debates on immigration in Canada.议长先生:加拿大议会关于移民问题辩论性质的变化。
Can Rev Sociol. 2023 Nov;60(4):616-645. doi: 10.1111/cars.12450. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
8
Legislative coalitions with incomplete information.信息不完全的立法联盟。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 14;114(11):2876-2880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608514114. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
9
The Politics of Health Policy Agenda Setting in India: The Case of the PMJAY Program.印度卫生政策议程设置的政治:以 PMJAY 计划为例。
Health Syst Reform. 2023 Dec 31;9(1):2229062. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2023.2229062.
10
Negative Campaigning and the Logic of Retaliation in Multiparty Competition.多党竞争中的负面竞选与报复逻辑
Int J Press Polit. 2016 Apr;21(2):253-272. doi: 10.1177/1940161215626566. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Who will attack the competitors? How political parties resolve strategic and collective action dilemmas in negative campaigning.谁会攻击竞争对手?政党如何在负面竞选活动中解决战略和集体行动困境。
Party Politics. 2017 Nov;23(6):666-679. doi: 10.1177/1354068815619832. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
2
Coalition Policy-Making under Constraints: Examining the Role of Preferences and Institutions.受限条件下的联盟决策:审视偏好与制度的作用
West Eur Polit. 2014 May 4;37(3):564-583. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.841069. Epub 2013 Oct 9.