• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中,预测净不良临床和脑部事件发生的因素:一项真实世界研究。

Factors predicting the occurrence of net adverse clinical and cerebral events in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with clopidogrel or ticagrelor in combination with aspirin: a real-world study.

作者信息

Huang Man, Li Dandan, Li Lanting, Wang Yan, Zhang Linlin, Chen Yundai, Wang Dao Wen

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Senior Department of Cardiology, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jan;10(2):98. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-7038.

DOI:10.21037/atm-21-7038
PMID:35282096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8848390/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to establish the factors influencing the clinical benefits of ticagrelor and clopidogrel for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) surgery.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, real-world study was conducted on patients with ACS whose data were sourced from 3 databases, namely the BRIC-ACS(I) study, COSTIC study, and 301 Hospital PCI patient database from January 2014 to October 2017. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE).

RESULTS

A total of 7,236 ACS patients were included, of which 4,444 patients (61.4%) and 2,792 patients (38.6%) were in the clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group and ticagrelor DAPT group, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for NACCE was significantly higher in patients aged ≥65 years than those aged ≤65 years in the clopidogrel DAPT group (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.68-2.76) and ticagrelor DAPT group (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.34-2.29). In patients treated with clopidogrel DAPT, patients with unstable angina had a significantly lower HR for NACCE than patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Use of beta blockers (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60-0.99) was an influencing factor in patients treated with clopidogrel DAPT, whereas in patients treated with ticagrelor DAPT, only smoking status (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.99) was a significant influencing factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, hypertension status, and presence or absence of unstable angina were factors influencing the composite outcome of NACCE. The selection of patients to be treated with either clopidogrel DAPT or ticagrelor DAPT depending on the presence or absence of factors influencing treatment outcome may improve therapeutic management.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定影响替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)手术的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者临床获益的因素。

方法

对ACS患者进行了一项多中心、回顾性、真实世界研究,数据来源于3个数据库,即2014年1月至2017年10月的BRIC-ACS(I)研究、COSTIC研究和301医院PCI患者数据库。主要终点是净不良临床和脑血管事件(NACCE)。

结果

共纳入7236例ACS患者,其中氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)组4444例(61.4%),替格瑞洛DAPT组2792例(38.6%)。氯吡格雷DAPT组中年龄≥65岁患者的NACCE风险比(HR)显著高于年龄≤65岁患者(HR:2.15,95%CI:1.68-2.76),替格瑞洛DAPT组中也是如此(HR:1.75,95%CI:1.34-2.29)。在接受氯吡格雷DAPT治疗的患者中,不稳定型心绞痛患者的NACCE HR显著低于ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者。使用β受体阻滞剂(HR:0.77,95%CI:0.60-0.99)是氯吡格雷DAPT治疗患者的一个影响因素,而在替格瑞洛DAPT治疗的患者中,只有吸烟状态(HR:0.75,95%CI:0.57-0.99)是一个显著影响因素。

结论

年龄、高血压状态以及是否存在不稳定型心绞痛是影响NACCE复合结局的因素。根据影响治疗结局的因素的有无来选择接受氯吡格雷DAPT或替格瑞洛DAPT治疗的患者,可能会改善治疗管理。

相似文献

1
Factors predicting the occurrence of net adverse clinical and cerebral events in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with clopidogrel or ticagrelor in combination with aspirin: a real-world study.在接受氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中,预测净不良临床和脑部事件发生的因素:一项真实世界研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jan;10(2):98. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-7038.
2
Comparison of Net Clinical Benefit Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients in China With Acute Coronary Syndrome.中国急性冠脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛的净临床获益比较。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):754-766. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01907-3. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
3
Clopidogrel or ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: CHANGE DAPT.在接受新一代药物洗脱支架治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中,氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛:CHANGE DAPT。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Nov 20;13(10):1168-1176. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00634.
4
Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Older Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Real-World Registry.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者:来自真实世界注册研究的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 15;9:859962. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.859962. eCollection 2022.
5
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
6
Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
7
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in high-bleeding risk patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the multicenter START-ANTIPLATELET registry.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛在急性冠状动脉综合征伴高出血风险患者中的应用:来自多中心 START-ANTIPLATELET 注册研究的见解。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;16(2):379-387. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02404-1. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
9
Association of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel With Net Adverse Clinical Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者净临床不良事件的影响。
JAMA. 2020 Oct 27;324(16):1640-1650. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.16167.
10
Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis.普拉格雷(Efient®)联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(TA182综述):系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(29):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19290.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of elevated postoperative high-sensitivity troponin T in diabetes mellitus patients for ischemic events within 12 months after PCI in ACS patients: a retrospective cohort study.糖尿病患者术后高敏肌钙蛋白T升高对急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后12个月内缺血事件的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 27;12:1606435. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1606435. eCollection 2025.
2
Clopidogrel-loaded vascular grafts prepared using digital light processing 3D printing.采用数字光处理 3D 打印技术制备载氯吡格雷的血管移植物。
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2024 Jun;14(6):1693-1707. doi: 10.1007/s13346-023-01484-8. Epub 2023 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel With Net Adverse Clinical Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者净临床不良事件的影响。
JAMA. 2020 Oct 27;324(16):1640-1650. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.16167.
2
Efficacy assessment of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention by data mining and machine-learning decision tree approaches.通过数据挖掘和机器学习决策树方法评估替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Oct;45(5):1076-1086. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13172. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
Selatogrel, a novel P2Y inhibitor: a review of the pharmacology and clinical development.塞拉格雷,一种新型的 P2Y 抑制剂:药理学和临床开发研究综述。
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2020 Jun;29(6):537-546. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2020.1764533. Epub 2020 May 12.
4
Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在 70 岁或以上非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较(POPular AGE):随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30325-1.
5
China cardiovascular diseases report 2018: an updated summary.《中国心血管病报告2018:最新概要》
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2020 Jan;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2020.01.001.
6
Impact of extended dual antiplatelet therapy on clinical prognosis in acute coronary syndrome patients with intermediate or high ischemic risk defined by the GRACE score.GRACE 评分定义的中高危缺血风险的急性冠脉综合征患者中,延长双联抗血小板治疗对临床预后的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;95 Suppl 1:665-673. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28736. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
A risk score to predict postdischarge bleeding among acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: BRIC-ACS study.BRIC-ACS 研究:一种预测行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院后出血风险的评分。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 1;93(7):1194-1204. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28325. Epub 2019 May 21.
8
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 13;138(20):e618-e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617.
9
Hypertension Is an Independent Predictor of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in Young Adults with Acute Coronary Syndrome.高血压是急性冠脉综合征年轻患者多支冠状动脉疾病的独立预测因素。
Int J Hypertens. 2018 Nov 13;2018:7623639. doi: 10.1155/2018/7623639. eCollection 2018.
10
Impact of Baseline Bleeding Risk on Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Chinese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在中国行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性与基线出血风险的关系。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Sep 5;131(17):2017-2024. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.239306.