Morin Marika, Duchesne Elise, Bernier Jacinthe, Blanchette Philippe, Langlois Daphnée, Hébert Luc J
Department of Health Sciences and Centre intersectoriel en santé durable, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Saguenay, Québec, Canada.
Interdisciplinary Research Group on Neuromuscular Disorders, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean, Jonquière, Canada.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Dec 7;4(1):100172. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100172. eCollection 2022 Mar.
To map the body of existing literature regarding reference values of maximal isometric muscle strength (MIMS) of upper and lower limbs obtained with handheld dynamometers (HHD) in healthy adults to identify potential gaps in the literature and specify future research needs.
A scoping review in which PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL plus, PEDRO, and Cochrane databases were searched before May 1, 2020.
All studies using standardized HHD protocols for the purpose of establishing reference values in healthy adult population were included. Two independent reviewers completed an initial screening of article titles and abstracts, and the remaining articles were read in their entirety and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements were discussed, with recourse to a third reviewer when needed.
Data of the selected studies were extracted and charted by 2 independent reviewers using a tested data extraction grid to ensure method standardization. Data were subsequently merged to produce the complete final extracted data.
Titles and abstracts of 4015 studies were screened, 46 articles were fully reviewed, and 9 manuscripts were selected for the final analysis. A large variability exists between protocols used for muscle testing in terms of type of device, measurement units, subject positioning, and muscle groups tested.
The existing literature regarding HHD reference values of MIMS is scarce and presents gaps notably relating to strength units and well-described protocols with known psychometric properties, despite the development and increased availability of high quality HHD. This observation emphasizes the critical need to develop reference values in manual dynamometry in adults to optimize the use of manual dynamometry for diagnostic and prognostic decisions.
梳理关于健康成年人使用手持测力计(HHD)获得的上下肢最大等长肌力(MIMS)参考值的现有文献,以识别文献中的潜在空白并明确未来的研究需求。
一项范围综述,于2020年5月1日前检索了PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL plus、PEDRO和Cochrane数据库。
纳入所有使用标准化HHD方案为健康成年人群建立参考值的研究。两名独立评审员对文章标题和摘要进行了初步筛选,其余文章全文阅读并根据纳入和排除标准进行筛选。如有分歧进行讨论,必要时寻求第三位评审员的帮助。
由两名独立评审员使用经过测试的数据提取表格提取所选研究的数据并制表,以确保方法标准化。随后将数据合并以生成完整的最终提取数据。
筛选了4015项研究的标题和摘要,对46篇文章进行了全面评审,选择了9篇手稿进行最终分析。在用于肌肉测试的方案之间,在设备类型、测量单位、受试者体位和测试的肌肉群方面存在很大差异。
关于MIMS的HHD参考值的现有文献稀缺,并且存在明显的空白,特别是在强度单位和具有已知心理测量特性的详细描述方案方面,尽管高质量HHD有了发展且可用性增加。这一观察结果强调了迫切需要制定成人手动肌力测试的参考值,以优化手动肌力测试在诊断和预后决策中的应用。