生物陶瓷与Endosequence根修复材料作为直接盖髓材料的比较评价：一项临床研究。
Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study.
作者信息
Parikh Margi, Kishan Karkala Venkappa, Shah Nimisha Chinmay, Parikh Maitry, Saklecha Purnima
机构信息
Parikh Dental Clinic, K. M. Shah Dental College, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, K. M. Shah Dental College, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
出版信息
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;24(4):330-335. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_321_21. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
AIM
The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis were allotted into two experimental groups: Group I -Biodentine, Group II-ERRM. Follow-up evaluations were done. Every 24 h for 7 days, the pain was assessed using visual analog scale.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Paired -test along with Pearson's Chi-square test was performed.
RESULTS
The success rate of clinical assessment at 12 months for biodentine group is 78.60% and ERRM Group is 64.70%.
CONCLUSION
Biodentine group performed superior than ERRM group clinically at all-time interval and hence it can be successfully used to restore exposed vital tooth.
目的
本研究旨在对生物陶瓷和Endosequence根修复材料（ERRM）作为直接盖髓剂，在3个月、6个月和12个月的间隔期进行临床评估。
材料与方法
将60颗患有深龋且无任何不可逆性牙髓炎迹象的恒牙后牙分为两个实验组：第一组——生物陶瓷，第二组——ERRM。进行随访评估。在7天内每24小时使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛情况。
统计分析
进行配对t检验以及Pearson卡方检验。
结果
生物陶瓷组在12个月时的临床评估成功率为78.60%，ERRM组为64.70%。
结论
在所有时间间隔内，生物陶瓷组在临床上的表现均优于ERRM组，因此它可成功用于修复暴露的活髓牙。
Zotero 插件