• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同根管锥度和根尖预备尺寸的单根牙模拟根管内冲洗液流量和根尖压力的评估:一项研究。

Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An study.

作者信息

Sujith Immadi Laxmi, Teja Kavalipurapu Venkata, Ramesh Sindhu

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;24(4):314-322. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_651_20. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_651_20
PMID:35282587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8896124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Irrigation dynamics vary in optimally shaped canals. Various factors combine to create a stress-induced environment leading to a dynamic irrigant flow.

AIM

The aim of the study is to evaluate the irrigant flow and apical pressure using 30G open-ended needle in virtually created root canal model of single-rooted teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty extracted single-rooted premolars were selected and prepared using a single rotary instrument Hyflex CM and grouped as - Group I: 30 size 0.6% taper ( = 15), Group II: 30 size 0.4% taper ( = 15), Group III: 25 size 0.6% taper ( = 15), and Group IV: 25 size 0.4% taper ( = 15). Postinstrumentation imaging was carried out using cone-beam computed tomography, and computer-aided design models were obtained. Subgrouping was done based on the nozzle position, and computational fluid dynamic analysis was carried out for the respective parameters assessed.

RESULTS

Statistical significance was elicited in all the groups at different nozzle positions analyzed ( < 0.05). A post hoc test revealed significance in the mean flow rate and flow velocity in Group I at low nozzle position ( < 0.05) as compared to others.

CONCLUSIONS

30 size 0.6% tapered preparations proved efficient irrigant flow and least apical pressures at all nozzle positions.

摘要

背景

在形状优化的根管中,冲洗动力学有所不同。多种因素共同作用,营造出一个由应力诱导的环境,从而导致冲洗液动态流动。

目的

本研究旨在使用30G开放式针头,在虚拟创建的单根牙根管模型中评估冲洗液流量和根尖压力。

材料与方法

选取60颗拔除的单根前磨牙,使用单一旋转器械Hyflex CM进行预备,并分为四组:第一组:30号、锥度0.6%(n = 15);第二组:30号、锥度0.4%(n = 15);第三组:25号、锥度0.6%(n = 15);第四组:25号、锥度0.4%(n = 15)。根管预备后,使用锥形束计算机断层扫描进行成像,并获得计算机辅助设计模型。根据针头位置进行亚组划分,并对评估的各个参数进行计算流体动力学分析。

结果

在分析的不同针头位置,所有组均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。事后检验显示,与其他组相比,第一组在低针头位置时平均流速和流速具有显著性差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

30号、锥度0.6%的根管预备在所有针头位置均显示出有效的冲洗液流动和最小的根尖压力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda6/8896124/8cea43080cfd/JCD-24-314-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda6/8896124/e4b9472ca36b/JCD-24-314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda6/8896124/055cf98eecfc/JCD-24-314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda6/8896124/0c49ec1ea29a/JCD-24-314-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda6/8896124/8cea43080cfd/JCD-24-314-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda6/8896124/e4b9472ca36b/JCD-24-314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda6/8896124/055cf98eecfc/JCD-24-314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda6/8896124/0c49ec1ea29a/JCD-24-314-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda6/8896124/8cea43080cfd/JCD-24-314-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An study.不同根管锥度和根尖预备尺寸的单根牙模拟根管内冲洗液流量和根尖压力的评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;24(4):314-322. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_651_20. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
Syringe Irrigation in Minimally Shaped Root Canals Using 3 Endodontic Needles: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.使用 3 根根管器械对形态不规则根管进行冲洗的流固耦合分析。
J Endod. 2021 Sep;47(9):1487-1495. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Irrigant dynamics of a back-to-back double side-vented needle in root canals with various tapers: a computational fluid dynamics study.双侧双通气针在不同锥度根管中的冲洗动力学:计算流体动力学研究。
Odontology. 2024 Oct;112(4):1248-1256. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00940-2. Epub 2024 May 4.
4
Irrigation of human prepared root canal--ex vivo based computational fluid dynamics analysis.人体预备根管的冲洗——基于体外实验的计算流体动力学分析
Croat Med J. 2012 Oct;53(5):470-9. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.470.
5
Assessment of Apical Pressures in Single and Joining Canals - An Ex Vivo Study Based on Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis.单根管和根管连接部的根尖压力评估——基于计算流体动力学分析的离体研究。
Eur Endod J. 2024 Jan 1;9(1):89-94. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.57060. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
6
Effect of apical size and taper on volume of irrigant delivered at working length with apical negative pressure at different root curvatures.不同根管弯曲度下,在工作长度时使用根管内负压,顶端大小和锥度对冲洗剂输送量的影响。
J Endod. 2013 Jan;39(1):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
7
A new method for real-time quantification of irrigant extrusion during root canal irrigation ex vivo.一种用于离体根管冲洗时实时定量分析冲洗剂挤出的新方法。
Int Endod J. 2013 Jul;46(7):619-31. doi: 10.1111/iej.12036. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
8
Evaluation of irrigant flow in the root canal using different needle types by an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model.应用非定常计算流体动力学模型评估不同类型的根管冲洗针的根管冲洗液流。
J Endod. 2010 May;36(5):875-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.026. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
9
Evaluation of apical extrusion and cone-beam computed tomography assessment of irrigant penetration in oval-shaped canals, using XP Endo Finisher and EndoActivator.使用XP根管锉和根管激活器评估椭圆形根管中根尖挤出情况及锥束计算机断层扫描对冲洗剂渗透的评估
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Mar-Apr;23(2):185-189. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_390_19. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
The antibacterial efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming in root canals with different diameters or tapers.不同直径或锥度根管中光引发光声流的抗菌效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01903-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of postoperative pain in endodontic retreatment with apical periodontitis using ozonated 2% chlorhexidine and 0.1% octenidine application: A randomized clinical trial.使用2%臭氧氯己定和0.1%奥替尼啶评估根尖周炎根管再治疗术后疼痛:一项随机临床试验。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jun;27(6):654-661. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_146_24. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Flow characteristics of positive and negative pressure irrigation in an immature tooth - A computational fluid dynamics study.未成熟牙齿中正负压力冲洗的流动特性——一项计算流体动力学研究
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023 Sep-Oct;26(5):544-549. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_240_23. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Is a filled lateral canal - A sign of superiority?充满液体的侧管——是优势的标志吗?
J Dent Sci. 2020 Dec;15(4):562-563. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
2
Evaluation of needle movement effect on root canal irrigation using a computational fluid dynamics model.基于计算流体动力学模型评价根管冲洗中针的运动效果。
Biomed Eng Online. 2019 May 6;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0679-5.
3
Influence of apical preparation size and irrigation technique on root canal debridement: a histological analysis of round and oval root canals.
Numerical investigation of injection characteristics on normal saline irrigation quality in curved root canals using computational fluid dynamics.
基于计算流体动力学对弯曲根管内生理盐水冲洗质量的注射特性进行数值研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 15;10(1):e23773. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23773. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
4
Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of different combinations of calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis.不同浓度氢氧化钙组合抗粪肠球菌效果的比较评价。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 11;23(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03552-4.
5
Assessment of Apical Pressures in Single and Joining Canals - An Ex Vivo Study Based on Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis.单根管和根管连接部的根尖压力评估——基于计算流体动力学分析的离体研究。
Eur Endod J. 2024 Jan 1;9(1):89-94. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.57060. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
6
Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation-An Ex-Vivo Study.使用自动装置和传统注射器针头进行根管冲洗的根管清洁度比较研究——一项离体研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;15(18):6184. doi: 10.3390/ma15186184.
7
The effect of various in-vitro and ex-vivo parameters on irrigant flow and apical pressure using manual syringe needle irrigation: Systematic review.使用手动注射器针头冲洗时各种体外和离体参数对冲洗液流量和根尖压力的影响:系统评价
Saudi Dent J. 2022 Feb;34(2):87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
根管预备大小和冲洗技术对根管清创的影响:圆根管和椭圆根管的组织学分析。
Int Endod J. 2019 Sep;52(9):1366-1376. doi: 10.1111/iej.13127. Epub 2019 May 6.
4
Determination of the Initial Apical Canal Diameter by the First File to Bind or Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Measurements Using Micro-computed Tomography as the Gold Standard: An Ex Vivo Study in Human Cadavers.使用 micro-CT 作为金标准,通过第一根牙胶尖或锥形束 CT 测量来确定初始根尖直径:一项人体尸体的离体研究。
J Endod. 2019 May;45(5):619-622. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
5
An in vivo assessment of the influence of needle gauges on endodontic irrigation flow rate.针规对根管冲洗液流速影响的体内评估
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):189-93. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.178708.
6
Fluid Dynamics and Biofilm Removal Generated by Syringe-delivered and 2 Ultrasonic-assisted Irrigation Methods: A Novel Experimental Approach.注射器输送和两种超声辅助冲洗方法产生的流体动力学及生物膜清除:一种新的实验方法
J Endod. 2015 Jun;41(6):884-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.027. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
7
Master apical file size - smaller or larger: a systematic review of healing outcomes.主导锉尖端直径大小——更小还是更大:愈合效果的系统评价。
Int Endod J. 2015 Jul;48(7):639-47. doi: 10.1111/iej.12370. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
Wall shear stress effects of different endodontic irrigation techniques and systems.不同根管冲洗技术和系统的壁面切应力效应。
J Dent. 2013 Jul;41(7):636-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
9
Periapical pressures developed by nonbinding irrigation needles at various irrigation delivery rates.不同冲洗输送速率下非密闭冲洗针产生的根尖周压力。
J Endod. 2013 Apr;39(4):529-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
10
Apical pressure and extent of irrigant flow beyond the needle tip during positive-pressure irrigation in an in vitro root canal model.在体外根管模型中,正压冲洗时针尖周围的根尖压力和冲洗液流动范围。
J Endod. 2013 Apr;39(4):511-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 30.