Suppr超能文献

接受血管造影术的1型和2型心肌梗死患者的长期临床结局:来自韩国急性心肌梗死-国立卫生研究院登记处的数据

Long-term clinical outcomes of type 1 type 2 myocardial infarction in patients who underwent angiography: data from the Korea acute myocardial infarction-national institute of health registry.

作者信息

Han Xiongyi, Jeong Myung Ho, Bai Liyan, Ahn Joon Ho, Hyun Dae Young, Cho Kyung Hoon, Kim Min Chul, Sim Doo Sun, Hong Young Joon, Kim Ju Han, Ahn Youngkeun

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Cardiology, Yanbian University Hospital, Yanji, China.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2022 Feb;12(1):55-66. doi: 10.21037/cdt-21-434.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the cause of increase the clinical research observational evidence on type 2 myocardial infraction (T2MI), the study compared the characteristics of T2MI and T1MI with respect to major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality as long-term outcomes from a large, nationwide, prospective Korean cohort registry.

METHODS

From 13,105 consecutively enrolled individuals in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH) registry between October 2011 and December 2015, 11,053 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients were divided into the T1MI (n=10,545) and T2MI (n=508) groups. All patients completed ≥3 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models showed that the cumulative rate of MACE was similar between the 2 groups (11.4% 13.4%, log-rank P=0.185) at 3 years. However, the T2MI group showed higher rates of all-cause death [12.6% 9.4%, log-rank P=0.019; hazard ratio (HR), 1.42; 95% CI: 1.08-1.85; P=0.012] and non-cardiac death (3.5% 5.3%, log-rank P=0.043; HR, 1.55; 95% CI: 1.01-2.37; P=0.043) than the T1MI group. Male sex (HR 1.540; 95% CI: 1.218-1.947, P<0.001), old age (≥65 years; HR, 3.546; 95% CI: 2.645-4.753, P<0.001), low hemoglobin level (<12 g/dL; HR, 2.335; 95% CI: 1.841-2.961, P<0.001), high heart rate (>100 beats/min; HR, 1.852; 95% CI: 1.436-2.388, P<0.001), low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (<60 mL/min/1.73 m; HR, 2.373; 95% CI: 1.874-3.005, P<0.001), high body mass index (>25 kg/m; HR, 0.644; 95% CI: 0.514-0.805, P<0.001), and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<40%; HR, 1.487; 95% CI: 1.095-2.020, P=0.011) were the independent predictors for 3-year non-cardiac mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the 2 groups did not differ in MACE, the total mortality rate was higher in T2MI than in T1MI, especially non-cardiac mortality. The independent predictors for non-cardiac mortality were male sex, old age, anemia, low GFR, tachycardia, obesity, and low LVEF.

摘要

背景

为增加2型心肌梗死(T2MI)的临床研究观察证据,本研究从一个大型的、全国性的、前瞻性韩国队列登记处比较了T2MI和T1MI在主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和死亡率方面的特征,将其作为长期预后指标。

方法

在2011年10月至2015年12月期间,韩国急性心肌梗死-国立卫生研究院(KAMIR-NIH)登记处连续登记的13105例患者中,11053例急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者被分为T1MI组(n = 10545)和T2MI组(n = 508)。所有患者均完成了≥3年的随访。

结果

Kaplan-Meier曲线分析和Cox比例风险回归模型显示,两组在3年时MACE的累积发生率相似(11.4%对13.4%,对数秩检验P = 0.185)。然而,T2MI组的全因死亡率[12.6%对9.4%,对数秩检验P = 0.019;风险比(HR),1.42;95%置信区间(CI):1.08 - 1.85;P = 0.012]和非心源性死亡率(3.5%对5.3%,对数秩检验P = 0.043;HR,1.55;95% CI:1.01 - 2.37;P = 0.043)均高于T1MI组。男性(HR 1.540;95% CI:1.218 - 1.947,P < 0.001)、老年(≥65岁;HR,3.546;95% CI:2.645 - 4.753,P < 0.001)、低血红蛋白水平(<12 g/dL;HR,2.335;95% CI:1.841 - 2.961,P < 0.001)、高心率(>100次/分钟;HR,1.852;95% CI:1.436 - 2.388,P < 0.001)、低肾小球滤过率(GFR)(<60 mL/min/1.73 m²;HR,2.373;95% CI:1.874 - 3.005,P < 0.001)、高体重指数(>25 kg/m²;HR,0.644;95% CI:0.514 - 0.805,P < 0.001)和低左心室射血分数(LVEF)(<40%;HR,1.487;95% CI:1.095 - 2.020,P = 0.011)是3年非心源性死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

尽管两组在MACE方面无差异,但T2MI组的总死亡率高于T1MI组,尤其是非心源性死亡率。非心源性死亡率的独立预测因素为男性、老年、贫血、低GFR、心动过速、肥胖和低LVEF。

相似文献

2
Type 2 myocardial infarction: A descriptive analysis and comparison with type 1 myocardial infarction.
J Cardiol. 2016 Jan;67(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 5.
3
Incidence, Trends, and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Community Cohort.
Circulation. 2020 Feb 11;141(6):454-463. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043100. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
6
Characteristics and occurrence of type 2 myocardial infarction in emergency department patients: a prospective study.
Emerg Med J. 2018 Mar;35(3):169-175. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206869. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
Comparison of outcome among type 2 vs type 1 myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Investig Med. 2023 Mar;71(3):223-234. doi: 10.1177/10815589221140589. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
10
Incident Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Cohort of Patients Undergoing Coronary or Peripheral Arterial Angiography.
Circulation. 2017 Jan 10;135(2):116-127. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023052. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived mitral annular plane systolic excursion: a robust indicator for risk stratification after myocardial infarction.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Apr;40(4):897-906. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03058-2. Epub 2024 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Type 1 Versus Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 23;77(7):848-857. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.034.
3
Cardiovascular Mortality After Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Young Adults.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Mar 10;75(9):1003-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.052.
4
Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Geriatric Population-based Model of Pathogenesis.
Aging Dis. 2020 Feb 1;11(1):108-117. doi: 10.14336/AD.2019.0405. eCollection 2020 Feb.
5
Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction Patients Implanted With a Prophylactic Defibrillator (from the Very-High-Rate Registry).
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;125(7):1001-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.053. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
Incidence, Trends, and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Community Cohort.
Circulation. 2020 Feb 11;141(6):454-463. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043100. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Type 2 myocardial infarction: is it a geriatric syndrome?
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 May;32(5):759-768. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01452-8. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
8
A systematic review on the triggers and clinical features of type 2 myocardial infarction.
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Oct;42(10):1019-1027. doi: 10.1002/clc.23230. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
9
Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: JACC Review Topic of the Week.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 16;73(14):1846-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.018.
10
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2231-2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验