• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出院后非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期死亡率高于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者。

Higher Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction than ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Discharge.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.

Department of Cardiology, Yanbian University Hospital, Yanji, China.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2021 May;62(5):400-408. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.5.400.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2021.62.5.400
PMID:33908210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8084695/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare mortality rates after discharge between the patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and identify each mortality risk factors in these two types of myocardial infarction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2015, 13105 consecutive patients were enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction-National Institute of Health registry (KAMIR-NIH); 12271 patients with acute myocardial infarction met the inclusion criteria and were further stratified into the STEMI (n=5828) and NSTEMI (n=6443) groups. The occurrence of mortality and cardiac mortality at 3 years were compared between groups, and the factors associated with mortality for NSTEMI and STEMI were evaluated.

RESULTS

The comparison between these two groups and long-term follow-up outcomes showed that the cumulative rates of all-cause and cardiac mortality were higher in the NSTEMI group than in the STEMI group [all-cause mortality: 10.9% vs. 5.8%; hazards ratio (HR), 0.464; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.359-0.600, <0.001; cardiac mortality: 6.6% vs. 3.5%, HR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.344-0.654, <0.001, respectively). In the NSTEMI group, low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; <40%), no percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), old age (≥65 years), and low hemoglobin level (<12 g/dL) were identified as risk factors for 3-year mortality. In the STEMI group, old age, low glomerular filtration rate (<60 mL/min/1.73 m²), low LVEF, high heart rate (>100 beats/min), no PCI, and low hemoglobin level were identified as the risk factors for 3-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

The NSTEMI group had higher mortality compared to the STEMI group during the 3-year clinical follow-up after discharge. Low LVEF and no PCI were the main risk factors for mortality in the NSTEMI group. In contrast, old age and renal dysfunction were the risk factors for long-term mortality in the STEMI group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者出院后的死亡率,并确定这两种类型心肌梗死的各自死亡风险因素。

材料和方法

2011 年至 2015 年间,连续纳入 13105 例韩国急性心肌梗死-国立卫生研究院登记处(KAMIR-NIH)患者;12271 例急性心肌梗死患者符合纳入标准,并进一步分为 STEMI(n=5828)和 NSTEMI(n=6443)组。比较两组患者的 3 年死亡率和心脏死亡率,并评估 NSTEMI 和 STEMI 患者死亡相关因素。

结果

两组比较及长期随访结果显示,NSTEMI 组全因死亡率和心脏死亡率均高于 STEMI 组[全因死亡率:10.9% vs. 5.8%;危险比(HR),0.464;95%置信区间(CI),0.359-0.600,<0.001;心脏死亡率:6.6% vs. 3.5%,HR,0.474;95%CI,0.344-0.654,<0.001]。在 NSTEMI 组中,左心室射血分数(LVEF)<40%、未行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、年龄较大(≥65 岁)和低血红蛋白水平(<12 g/dL)被确定为 3 年死亡的危险因素。在 STEMI 组中,年龄较大、肾小球滤过率(GFR)<60 mL/min/1.73 m²、LVEF 较低、心率较高(>100 次/分)、未行 PCI 和低血红蛋白水平被确定为 3 年死亡的危险因素。

结论

与 STEMI 组相比,NSTEMI 组在出院后 3 年的临床随访期间死亡率更高。LVEF 降低和未行 PCI 是 NSTEMI 组死亡的主要危险因素。相反,年龄较大和肾功能障碍是 STEMI 组长期死亡的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb1b/8084695/c9b796e67315/ymj-62-400-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb1b/8084695/966aa606ed53/ymj-62-400-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb1b/8084695/c9b796e67315/ymj-62-400-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb1b/8084695/966aa606ed53/ymj-62-400-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb1b/8084695/c9b796e67315/ymj-62-400-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Higher Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction than ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Discharge.出院后非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期死亡率高于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者。
Yonsei Med J. 2021 May;62(5):400-408. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.5.400.
2
Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with successful percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: Comparison between STEMI and NSTEMI.血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂对成功行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴药物洗脱支架的急性心肌梗死患者长期临床结局的影响:STEMI 与 NSTEMI 比较。
Atherosclerosis. 2019 Jan;280:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.11.030. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
3
Current characteristics and management of ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the Tokyo metropolitan area: from the Tokyo CCU network registered cohort.东京都地区ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的当前特征与管理:来自东京CCU网络注册队列研究
Heart Vessels. 2016 Nov;31(11):1740-1751. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0791-9. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
4
Improved heart function and cardiac remodelling following sacubitril/valsartan in acute coronary syndrome with HF.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗急性冠脉综合征合并心力衰竭患者的心脏功能改善和心脏重构。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;11(2):937-949. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14646. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
5
Characteristics, Management, and Outcome of Transient ST-elevation Versus Persistent ST-elevation and Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction.短暂性ST段抬高与持续性ST段抬高及非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的特征、管理与结局
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jun 15;121(12):1449-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Twelve-month clinical outcomes of acute non-ST versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with reduced preprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.急性非ST段抬高型与ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前心肌梗死血流溶栓降低的情况下的12个月临床结局。
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Aug;29(5):416-422. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000632.
7
Acute Myocardial Infarction: Changes in Patient Characteristics, Management, and 6-Month Outcomes Over a Period of 20 Years in the FAST-MI Program (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) 1995 to 2015.急性心肌梗死:FAST-MI 项目(1995 年至 2015 年法国急性 ST 段抬高或非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死注册研究)20 年来患者特征、治疗方法的变化和 6 个月预后
Circulation. 2017 Nov 14;136(20):1908-1919. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030798. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
8
[Comparison of the predictive value of the modified CADILLAC, GRACE and TIMI risk scores for the risk of short-term death in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention].[改良CADILLAC、GRACE和TIMI风险评分对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短期死亡风险的预测价值比较]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Mar;35(3):299-304. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220727-00696.
9
Association between discharge destination and mid-term mortality in octogenarian patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.高龄 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者出院去向与中期死亡率的相关性。
J Cardiol. 2021 Feb;77(2):116-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
10
Clinical impacts of inhibition of renin-angiotensin system in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent successful late percutaneous coronary intervention.肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制对成功接受晚期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床影响。
J Cardiol. 2017 Jan;69(1):216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel artificial intelligence model using electrocardiogram for detecting acute myocardial infarction needing revascularization.使用心电图检测需要血管重建的急性心肌梗死的新型人工智能模型。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 May 13;6(4):608-618. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf049. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
One-Year Prognostic Differences and Management Strategies between ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights from the PRAISE Registry.ST段抬高型与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的一年预后差异及管理策略:来自PRAISE注册研究的见解
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s40256-025-00739-8.
3
Prognostic Role of Pan-Immune-Inflammatory Value in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

本文引用的文献

1
A LASSO-derived risk model for long-term mortality in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome.一种用于中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者长期死亡率的基于套索算法的风险模型。
J Transl Med. 2020 Apr 6;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02319-7.
2
Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Geriatric Population-based Model of Pathogenesis.2型心肌梗死:基于老年人群的发病机制模型。
Aging Dis. 2020 Feb 1;11(1):108-117. doi: 10.14336/AD.2019.0405. eCollection 2020 Feb.
3
Comparison of 1-year clinical outcomes between prasugrel and ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in type 2 diabetes patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention.
全免疫炎症值在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的预后作用
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 18;12(2):79. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12020079.
4
Management of high-flow arteriovenous access.高流量动静脉通路的管理
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2025 Jan;44(1):58-68. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.196. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
5
Reassess Hospital Costs and Mortality Between Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation in a Modern Context.在现代背景下重新评估伴或不伴 ST 段抬高的心肌梗死的医院成本和死亡率。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2024 Nov;29(6):e70027. doi: 10.1111/anec.70027.
6
Ten-year trends in lipid management among patients after myocardial infarction in South Korea.韩国心肌梗死后患者的血脂管理十年趋势。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0304710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304710. eCollection 2024.
7
Correlation analysis between the expression of serum microRNA-665 and the degree of coronary artery stenosis and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction.血清 microRNA-665 表达与急性心肌梗死患者冠状动脉狭窄程度及主要不良心血管事件的相关性分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Sep 23;19(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02998-z.
8
An observational study of therapeutic procedures and in-hospital outcomes among patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction in Spain, 2016-2022: the role of diabetes mellitus.西班牙 2016-2022 年急性心肌梗死患者住院治疗的治疗方法和院内结局的观察性研究:糖尿病的作用。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Aug 24;23(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02403-y.
9
Risk assessment for mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective cohort study.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的死亡风险评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 13;7(2):e1867. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1867. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
The association of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) with the risk of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MASLD)与心肌梗死风险的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2306192. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2306192. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
在接受成功经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 2 型糖尿病急性心肌梗死患者中,普拉格雷和替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷的 1 年临床结局比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(11):e14833. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014833.
4
Results of a 10-Year Experience in Korea Using Drug-Eluting Stents During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry).韩国在急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用药物洗脱支架的10年经验结果(来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;122(3):365-373. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 May 1.
5
Non-ST-Segment Acute Coronary Syndromes.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征
Cardiol Clin. 2018 Feb;36(1):37-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2017.08.003.
6
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
7
Chronic Kidney Disease, Fluid Overload and Diuretics: A Complicated Triangle.慢性肾脏病、液体过载与利尿剂:一个复杂的三角关系
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159335. eCollection 2016.
8
Provoking conditions, management and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial necrosis.2型心肌梗死和心肌坏死的诱发因素、管理及结局
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.045. Epub 2016 May 13.
9
Multicenter Cohort Study of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Korea - Interim Analysis of the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health Registry.韩国急性心肌梗死多中心队列研究——韩国急性心肌梗死注册中心-国立卫生研究院注册中心的中期分析
Circ J. 2016 May 25;80(6):1427-36. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0061. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
10
Long-Term Use of Ticagrelor in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction.替格瑞洛在既往心肌梗死患者中的长期应用。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 24;373(13):1271-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1508692.