Vascular Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Civil Engineering and Architecture Department, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Apr;63(4):567-577. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Increased aortic stiffness (AoS) has been recognised as a risk factor in the development of cardiovascular disease. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of aortic repair on AoS.
PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically for relevant studies evaluating the consequences of endovascular and open aortic repair on AoS.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement was followed to perform the research process. Papers containing data on AoS before and after both thoracic (TEVAR) and abdominal (EVAR) endovascular repair, as well as open surgical repair (OSR), were included for detailed evaluation. A fixed effects model was used to perform analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was calculated for each included study.
The first article cluster comprised 367 papers. After removal of duplicates and the adoption of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 14 articles remained, 13 of which were selected for meta-analysis. Ten studies analysed EVAR and three analysed TEVAR. Five of the selected papers were case control studies, with OSR adopted in four of these as the EVAR comparator. Several graft types were used in the endovascular group. AoS increased after TEVAR and EVAR, in terms of pulse wave velocity (PWV), even though several spatial levels and measurement modalities were adopted. No differences were described after OSR, although no pooled data could be analysed.
EVAR and TEVAR both demonstrated a significant increase in AoS measurement (PWV). Although the heterogeneity and the low number of available studies limit the strength of the results, this review highlights the potential deleterious endograft role in the cardiovascular system although further studies are needed to achieve robust evidence. Further studies are needed to improve the mutual interaction between aorta and endograft, minimising their impact on the native aortic wall properties.
主动脉僵硬度(AoS)增加已被认为是心血管疾病发展的一个危险因素。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估主动脉修复对 AoS 的影响。
系统地检索了 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 以评估评估胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)和腹主动脉腔内修复术(EVAR)以及开放手术修复(OSR)对 AoS 后果的相关研究。
遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告规范(PRISMA-P)声明进行研究过程。包含 AoS 在 TEVAR 和 EVAR 腔内修复以及开放手术修复前后的数据的论文被纳入详细评估。使用固定效应模型进行分析。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对每个纳入的研究进行评分。
第一组文章包含 367 篇论文。去除重复项并采用纳入/排除标准后,仍有 14 篇文章保留下来,其中 13 篇被纳入荟萃分析。10 项研究分析了 EVAR,3 项研究分析了 TEVAR。选定的 5 篇论文中有 5 篇是病例对照研究,其中 4 篇将 OSR 作为 EVAR 的对照组。在腔内治疗组中使用了几种移植物类型。尽管采用了几种空间水平和测量方式,但 TEVAR 和 EVAR 后 AoS 的脉搏波速度(PWV)都增加了。OSR 后未描述差异,尽管无法分析汇总数据。
EVAR 和 TEVAR 均显示 AoS 测量(PWV)显著增加。尽管异质性和可用研究数量有限限制了结果的强度,但本综述强调了潜在的有害移植物在心血管系统中的作用,尽管需要进一步研究以获得可靠的证据。需要进一步研究以改善主动脉和移植物之间的相互作用,最大限度地减少它们对原生主动脉壁特性的影响。