• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双联抗血小板治疗评分对接受P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床结局的影响

Impact of the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Receiving P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy.

作者信息

Huang Sheng-Wei, Chen Po-Wei, Feng Wen-Han, Hsieh I-Chang, Ho Ming-Yun, Cheng Chung-Wei, Yeh Hung-I, Chen Ching-Pei, Huang Wei-Chun, Fang Ching-Chang, Lin Hui-Wen, Lin Sheng-Hsiang, Tsai Chin-Feng, Su Chun-Hung, Li Yi-Heng

机构信息

School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 24;8:772820. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.772820. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.772820
PMID:35284499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8907151/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score is used to stratify ischemic and bleeding risk for antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study assessed the association between the DAPT score and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who were treated with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 498 ACS patients, with early aspirin discontinuation for various reasons and who received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after PCI, were enrolled during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018. The efficacy and safety between those with low (<2) and high (≥2) DAPT scores were compared during a 12-month follow-up after PCI. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the covariates between the two groups. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization, and stroke within 12 months. The safety endpoint was major bleeding, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding.

RESULTS

The primary composite endpoint occurred in 11.56 and 14.38% of the low and high DAPT score groups, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the primary composite endpoint between the two groups in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, the risk of recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization was significantly higher in the high DAPT score group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.900, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.095-3.295). The safety outcome for BARC 3 or 5 bleeding was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that ACS patients receiving P2Y12 monotherapy with high DAPT score had an increased risk of recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization.

摘要

背景

双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)评分用于对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后抗血小板治疗的缺血和出血风险进行分层。本研究评估了DAPT评分与接受P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者临床结局之间的关联。

方法

2014年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间,共纳入498例因各种原因早期停用阿司匹林且PCI后接受P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗的ACS患者。在PCI后12个月的随访期间,比较DAPT评分低(<2)和高(≥2)的患者之间的疗效和安全性。采用治疗权重逆概率法平衡两组之间的协变量。主要终点是12个月内全因死亡、复发性ACS或计划外血运重建以及卒中的复合结局。安全终点是大出血,定义为出血学术研究联盟(BARC)3级或5级出血。

结果

低DAPT评分组和高DAPT评分组的主要复合终点发生率分别为11.56%和14.38%。虽然在多变量Cox比例风险模型中两组之间的主要复合终点无显著差异,但高DAPT评分组复发性ACS或计划外血运重建的风险显著更高(调整后风险比[HR]:1.900,95%置信区间[CI]:1.095 - 3.295)。两组之间BARC 3级或5级出血的安全结局相似。

结论

我们的结果表明,接受P2Y12单药治疗且DAPT评分高的ACS患者复发性ACS或计划外血运重建的风险增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f4/8907151/776b1cfe20eb/fcvm-08-772820-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f4/8907151/776b1cfe20eb/fcvm-08-772820-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f4/8907151/776b1cfe20eb/fcvm-08-772820-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Receiving P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy.双联抗血小板治疗评分对接受P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床结局的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 24;8:772820. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.772820. eCollection 2021.
2
Effect of aspirin treatment duration on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with early aspirin discontinuation and received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.早期停用阿司匹林的急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗时,阿司匹林治疗时间长短对临床结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251109. eCollection 2021.
3
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis of the SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE Trials.P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征中常规双联抗血小板治疗或阿司匹林单药治疗的比较:SMART-DATE 和 SMART-CHOICE 试验的汇总分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;150:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.053. Epub 2021 May 16.
4
P2Y Inhibitor Monotherapy or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 P2Y 抑制剂单药治疗或双联抗血小板治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Feb 14;81(6):537-552. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.041.
5
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy with Clopidogrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛单药治疗P2Y12抑制剂的比较
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 1;9(6):1657. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061657.
6
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗与传统双联抗血小板治疗的Meta分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;16(2):232. doi: 10.3390/ph16020232.
7
P2y inhibitor monotherapy after 1-3 months dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冠状动脉疾病和慢性肾脏病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后1至3个月双联抗血小板治疗后使用P2Y抑制剂单药治疗:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 6;10:1197161. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1197161. eCollection 2023.
8
De-Escalation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prevail over Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergone Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,降阶梯双联抗血小板治疗优于强效P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 25;23(11):360. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311360. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
10
P2Y inhibitor monotherapy and dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.P2Y 抑制剂单药治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗:随机试验的更新荟萃分析。
Thromb Res. 2021 Feb;198:115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.11.038. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Protective Effect of Curcumin, Chrysin and Thymoquinone Injection on Trastuzumab-Induced Cardiotoxicity via Mitochondrial Protection.姜黄素、白杨素和百里醌注射液通过线粒体保护对曲妥珠单抗诱导的心脏毒性的保护作用
Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2022 Jul;22(7):663-675. doi: 10.1007/s12012-022-09750-w. Epub 2022 May 14.
2
Evaluating the Role of lncRNAs in the Incidence of Cardiovascular Diseases in Androgenetic Alopecia Patients.评估长链非编码RNA在雄激素性脱发患者心血管疾病发病中的作用。
Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2022 Jul;22(7):603-619. doi: 10.1007/s12012-022-09742-w. Epub 2022 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Antithrombotic Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征后抗栓治疗的管理
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):452-460. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1607714.
2
Patient-tailored antithrombotic therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的个体化抗栓治疗。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Mar 7;42(10):1038-1046. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1097.
3
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is It Safe to Abandon Aspirin?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗:停用阿司匹林安全吗?
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2021 Jan;37(1):1-8. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202101_37(1).20200806A.
4
Short dual antiplatelet therapy followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗继以 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后延长双联抗血小板治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 21;42(4):308-319. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa739.
5
DAPT Score to Stratify Ischemic and Bleeding Risk after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of 100,211 Patients.
Thromb Haemost. 2021 May;121(5):687-689. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721145. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
7
2020 Focused Update of the 2012 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.《2012年台湾心脏病学会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南2020年聚焦更新》
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020 Jul;36(4):285-307. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202007_36(4).20200619A.
8
Impact of coronary lesion complexity in percutaneous coronary intervention: one-year outcomes from the large, multicentre e-Ultimaster registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中冠状动脉病变复杂性的影响:来自大型多中心 e-Ultimaster 注册研究的一年结果。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Sep 18;16(7):603-612. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00361.
9
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
10
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy with Clopidogrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛单药治疗P2Y12抑制剂的比较
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 1;9(6):1657. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061657.