• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化环境因素对医疗应急人员应激相关缺勤风险的影响。

Quantifying the impact of environment factors on the risk of medical responders' stress-related absenteeism.

机构信息

Department of Decision Analytics and Risk, University of Southampton, Centre for Risk Research, Southampton, UK.

South Central Ambulance Service, NHS Foundation Trust, Southern House, Otterbourne, Sparrowgrove, UK.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2022 Aug;42(8):1834-1851. doi: 10.1111/risa.13909. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13909
PMID:35285544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9544400/
Abstract

Medical emergency response staff are exposed to incidents which may involve high-acuity patients or some intractable or traumatic situations. Previous studies on emergency response staff stress-related absence have focused on perceived factors and their impacts on absence leave. To date, analytical models on absenteeism risk prediction use past absenteeism to predict risk of future absenteeism. We show that these approaches ignore environment data, such as stress factors. The increased use of digital systems in emergency services allows us to gather data that were not available in the past and to apply a data-driven approach to quantify the effect of environment variables on the risk of stress-related absenteeism. We propose a two-stage data-driven framework to identify the variables of importance and to quantify their impact on medical staff stress-related risk of absenteeism. First, machine learning techniques are applied to identify the importance of different stressors on staff stress-related risk of absenteeism. Second, the Cox proportional-hazards model is applied to estimate the relative risk of each stressor. Four significant stressors are identified, these are the average night shift, past stress leave, the squared term of death confirmed by the Emergency Services and completion of the safeguarding form. We discuss counterintuitive results and implications to policy.

摘要

医疗应急响应人员会面临可能涉及高风险患者或某些棘手或创伤性情况的事件。之前关于应急响应人员与压力相关缺勤的研究主要集中在感知因素及其对缺勤的影响上。迄今为止,关于旷工风险预测的分析模型使用过去的旷工来预测未来旷工的风险。我们表明,这些方法忽略了环境数据,例如压力因素。数字系统在应急服务中的广泛使用使我们能够收集过去无法获得的数据,并采用数据驱动的方法来量化环境变量对与压力相关的旷工风险的影响。我们提出了一个两阶段的数据驱动框架,以确定重要变量,并量化它们对医疗人员与压力相关的旷工风险的影响。首先,应用机器学习技术来确定不同压力源对员工与压力相关的旷工风险的重要性。其次,应用 Cox 比例风险模型来估计每个压力源的相对风险。确定了四个重要的压力源,分别是平均夜班、过去的压力休假、由紧急服务部门确认的死亡平方项和完成保障表格。我们讨论了违反直觉的结果和对政策的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/4191439de5d0/RISA-42-1834-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/c3f83496bcb5/RISA-42-1834-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/4d6cb8c70333/RISA-42-1834-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/e9a7de14a2b1/RISA-42-1834-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/47da2aadb4b2/RISA-42-1834-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/023bf1b5046a/RISA-42-1834-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/440554eece91/RISA-42-1834-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/af2d4cfa9e7d/RISA-42-1834-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/b4e4b43fc142/RISA-42-1834-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/0dcf24e222a4/RISA-42-1834-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/083459cc52e8/RISA-42-1834-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/4191439de5d0/RISA-42-1834-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/c3f83496bcb5/RISA-42-1834-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/4d6cb8c70333/RISA-42-1834-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/e9a7de14a2b1/RISA-42-1834-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/47da2aadb4b2/RISA-42-1834-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/023bf1b5046a/RISA-42-1834-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/440554eece91/RISA-42-1834-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/af2d4cfa9e7d/RISA-42-1834-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/b4e4b43fc142/RISA-42-1834-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/0dcf24e222a4/RISA-42-1834-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/083459cc52e8/RISA-42-1834-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f1/9544400/4191439de5d0/RISA-42-1834-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the impact of environment factors on the risk of medical responders' stress-related absenteeism.量化环境因素对医疗应急人员应激相关缺勤风险的影响。
Risk Anal. 2022 Aug;42(8):1834-1851. doi: 10.1111/risa.13909. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
Approaches for predicting long-term sickness absence. Re: Schouten et al. "Screening manual and office workers for risk of long-term sickness absence: cut-off points for the Work Ability Index".预测长期病假的方法。回复:肖滕等人的《对办公室职员长期病假风险进行筛查:工作能力指数的临界点》。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 May 1;41(3):322-323. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3483. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
3
Prevalence and causes of medical absenteeism among staff (case study at mazandaran university of medical sciences: 2009-2010).员工医疗缺勤的患病率及原因(马赞德兰医科大学案例研究:2009 - 2010年)
Mater Sociomed. 2013 Dec;25(4):233-7. doi: 10.5455/msm.2013.25.233-237. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
4
Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza in Australia: Absenteeism and redeployment of emergency medicine and nursing staff.澳大利亚 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感大流行:急诊医学和护理人员缺勤和重新部署。
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Oct;23(5):615-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01461.x. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
5
Job demands, job resources and long-term sickness absence in the Danish eldercare services: a prospective analysis of register-based outcomes.丹麦老年护理服务中的工作要求、工作资源与长期病假:基于注册数据的前瞻性分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jan;68(1):127-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05724.x. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
6
The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol.基于正念的项目在减轻成人医院环境中护士所经历压力方面的有效性:定量证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):21-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380.
7
A Japanese Stress Check Program screening tool predicts employee long-term sickness absence: a prospective study.日本应激检查计划筛查工具预测员工长期病假:一项前瞻性研究。
J Occup Health. 2018 Jan 25;60(1):55-63. doi: 10.1539/joh.17-0161-OA. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
Shiftwork and sickness absence among police officers: the BCOPS study.轮班工作和警察病假:BCOPS 研究。
Chronobiol Int. 2013 Aug;30(7):930-41. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.790043. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
9
Impact of new technologies on stress, attrition and well-being in emergency call centers: the NextGeneration 9-1-1 study protocol.新技术对紧急呼叫中心压力、人员流失和福祉的影响:下一代 9-1-1 研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 4;18(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5510-x.
10
Analysis of job satisfaction, burnout, and intent of respiratory care practitioners to leave the field or the job.对呼吸治疗从业者的工作满意度、职业倦怠以及离开该领域或工作岗位的意愿进行分析。
Respir Care. 1992 Jan;37(1):46-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Musculoskeletal Disorder-Related Absenteeism Among Pediatric Healthcare Workers.新冠疫情对儿科医护人员肌肉骨骼疾病相关缺勤的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 11;13(10):1116. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101116.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency clinician perceptions of occupational stressors and coping strategies: A multi-site study.急诊临床医生对职业压力源及应对策略的认知:一项多地点研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2019 Jul;45:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence.预测频繁请病假员工的长期病假。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 May;92(4):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1384-6. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
3
Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
临床预测模型的判别与校准:医学文献的使用者指南。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1377-1384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126.
4
Review and evaluation of performance measures for survival prediction models in external validation settings.外部验证环境下生存预测模型性能指标的回顾与评估
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0336-2.
5
Prediction of long-term and frequent sickness absence using company data.利用公司数据预测长期频繁的病假情况。
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Apr 1;67(3):176-181. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx014. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
A Hybrid Methodology for Modeling Risk of Adverse Events in Complex Health-Care Settings.一种用于复杂医疗环境中不良事件风险建模的混合方法。
Risk Anal. 2017 Mar;37(3):421-440. doi: 10.1111/risa.12702. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
7
A Simulation Platform for Quantifying Survival Bias: An Application to Research on Determinants of Cognitive Decline.一种用于量化生存偏差的模拟平台:在认知衰退决定因素研究中的应用。
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Sep 1;184(5):378-87. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv451. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
8
Post-traumatic stress disorder among paramedic and hospital emergency personnel in south-east Iran.伊朗东南部急救医护人员创伤后应激障碍。
World J Emerg Med. 2013;4(1):26-31. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2013.01.005.
9
The development and validation of two prediction models to identify employees at risk of high sickness absence.开发和验证两个预测模型,以识别高病假风险的员工。
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Feb;23(1):128-33. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks036. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
10
Previous sick leaves as predictor of subsequent ones.以往病假作为预测后续病假的指标。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Jun;84(5):491-9. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0620-0. Epub 2011 Feb 12.