Department of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine.
Center for Human and Social Sciences, Kitasato University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences.
J Occup Health. 2018 Jan 25;60(1):55-63. doi: 10.1539/joh.17-0161-OA. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
On December 1, 2015, the Japanese government launched the Stress Check Program, a new occupational health policy to screen employees for high psychosocial stress in the workplace. As only weak evidence exists for the effectiveness of the program, we sought to estimate the risk of stress-associated long-term sickness absence as defined in the program manual.
Participants were 7356 male and 7362 female employees in a financial service company who completed the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ). We followed them for 1 year and used company records to identify employees with sickness absence of 1 month or longer. We defined high-risk employees using the BJSQ and criteria recommended by the program manual. We used the Cox proportional regression model to evaluate the prospective association between stress and long-term sickness absence.
During the follow-up period, we identified 34 male and 35 female employees who took long-term sickness absence. After adjustment for age, length of service, job type, position, and post-examination interview, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for incident long-term sickness absence in high-stress employees were 6.59 (3.04-14.25) for men and 2.77 (1.32-5.83) for women. The corresponding population attributable risks for high stress were 23.8% (10.3-42.6) for men and 21.0% (4.6-42.1) for women.
During the 1-year follow-up, employees identified as high stress (as defined by the Stress Check Program manual) had significantly elevated risks for long-term sickness absence.
2015 年 12 月 1 日,日本政府启动了“压力检查计划”,这是一项新的职业健康政策,旨在筛查工作场所中员工的高心理社会压力。由于该计划的有效性仅有微弱证据,我们试图根据计划手册中定义的标准来估计与压力相关的长期病假风险。
参与者为一家金融服务公司的 7356 名男性和 7362 名女性员工,他们完成了简明工作压力问卷(BJSQ)。我们对他们进行了为期 1 年的随访,并使用公司记录来识别病假超过 1 个月的员工。我们使用 BJSQ 和计划手册推荐的标准定义高风险员工。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估压力与长期病假之间的前瞻性关联。
在随访期间,我们确定了 34 名男性和 35 名女性员工请了长期病假。在校正年龄、服务年限、工作类型、职位和体检后访谈后,高压力员工发生长期病假的风险比(95%置信区间)为男性 6.59(3.04-14.25)和女性 2.77(1.32-5.83)。高压力对应的人群归因风险分别为男性 23.8%(10.3-42.6)和女性 21.0%(4.6-42.1)。
在 1 年的随访期间,根据“压力检查计划”手册定义的高压力员工发生长期病假的风险显著升高。