• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲临床实践指南:化疗治疗晚期食管和胃腺癌的使用:使用 AGREE II 和 AGREE-REX 工具进行的批判性评价。

European clinical practice guidelines on the use of chemotherapy for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancers: a critical review using the AGREE II and the AGREE-REX instruments.

机构信息

Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret N° 167. Pavelló 18, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.

Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Transl Oncol. 2022 Aug;24(8):1588-1604. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02807-w. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1007/s12094-022-02807-w
PMID:35286560
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the methodological quality of all relevant and recent European clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancers, and to synthesise their recommendations on the use of chemotherapy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, guidelines repositories, and other sources from 2010 onwards. We appraised quality using AGREE-II and AGREE-REX.

RESULTS

11 CPGs were included (five high, five low, and one moderate quality). Most guidelines showed deficiencies in the domain "applicability", with only three scoring above 60%. Nine did not report having sought the views and preferences of the target population. The lowest scores for AGREE-REX were item Values and Preferences of Target Users (1.6; SD 1.3), and item Values and Preferences of Policy/Decision-Makers (1.8; SD 1.7). The domain Clinical Applicability got the highest score and the domain Implementability got the lowest.

CONCLUSIONS

An urgent area of research is how to develop credible and implementable recommendations on the clinical use of CT for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancer.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42021236753).

摘要

目的

评估所有最新的欧洲关于晚期食管和胃癌症的临床实践指南(CPGs)的方法学质量,并综合其关于化疗使用的建议。

方法

我们从 2010 年起在 PubMed、EMBASE、指南库和其他来源中进行了检索。我们使用 AGREE-II 和 AGREE-REX 来评估质量。

结果

纳入了 11 项 CPG(5 项高质量、5 项低质量和 1 项中质量)。大多数指南在“适用性”领域存在缺陷,只有 3 项得分超过 60%。9 项没有报告征求目标人群的意见和偏好。AGREE-REX 中得分最低的项目是目标用户的价值观和偏好(1.6;SD 1.3)和政策/决策者的价值观和偏好(1.8;SD 1.7)。临床适用性领域得分最高,可操作性领域得分最低。

结论

一个紧迫的研究领域是如何制定关于晚期食管和胃癌症 CT 临床应用的可信和可实施的建议。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO(CRD42021236753)。

相似文献

1
European clinical practice guidelines on the use of chemotherapy for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancers: a critical review using the AGREE II and the AGREE-REX instruments.欧洲临床实践指南:化疗治疗晚期食管和胃腺癌的使用:使用 AGREE II 和 AGREE-REX 工具进行的批判性评价。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2022 Aug;24(8):1588-1604. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02807-w. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
Assessment of the quality of recommendations from 161 clinical practice guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instrument shows there is room for improvement.使用评估指南研究与评估-推荐卓越(AGREE-REX)工具评估 161 项临床实践指南的推荐意见质量表明,仍有改进的空间。
Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 18;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01036-5.
3
What information can we gain from the quality appraisal of guidelines with physical activity recommendations for cancer patients?A systematic review using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools.我们可以从评估癌症患者体力活动建议指南的质量中获得哪些信息?使用 AGREE II 和 AGREE-REX 工具进行的系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jan 4;31(1):97. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07567-5.
4
Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess the Quality of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations.临床实践指南推荐意见质量评估工具的制定与验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205535. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5535.
5
Methodological quality and clinical recommendations of guidelines on the management of dyslipidaemias for cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a systematic review and an appraisal through AGREE II and AGREE REX tools.降低心血管疾病风险的血脂异常管理指南的方法学质量与临床建议:一项系统评价及通过AGREE II和AGREE REX工具进行的评估
Fam Pract. 2024 Oct 8;41(5):649-661. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae029.
6
Methodological Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treatment Evidence-Based Guidelines: A Systematic Review Using the AGREE II and AGREE REX Tools.肺动脉高压治疗循证指南的方法学质量:使用AGREE II和AGREE REX工具的系统评价
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s10557-024-07605-w.
7
A systematic review of quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines on the primary prevention of food allergy and atopic dermatitis.关于食物过敏和特应性皮炎一级预防的临床实践指南的质量与一致性的系统评价。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Apr 25;16(4):100770. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100770. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for Helicobacter pylori infection and systematic analysis of the level of evidence for recommendations.幽门螺杆菌感染临床指南的质量评价及推荐意见证据水平的系统分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 10;19(4):e0301006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301006. eCollection 2024.
9
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for traumatic dental injuries.创伤性牙外伤临床实践指南的系统评价。
Dent Traumatol. 2023 Aug;39(4):371-380. doi: 10.1111/edt.12838. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
10
Quality and clinical applicability of recommendations for incontinence-associated dermatitis: A systematic review of guidelines and consensus statements.推荐用于失禁相关性皮炎的质量和临床适用性:指南和共识声明的系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jun;32(11-12):2371-2382. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16306. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.免疫疗法或靶向疗法与晚期胃癌的最佳支持治疗对比:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Mar 4;56(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01155-y.
2
Utilising systematic reviews to assess potential overtreatment and claim for better evidence-based research: an analysis of anticancer drugs versus supportive care in advanced esophageal cancer.利用系统评价评估潜在的过度治疗并呼吁开展更好的基于证据的研究:对晚期食管癌的抗癌药物与支持性护理的分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 18;13(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02594-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
The AGREE Enterprise: a decade of advancing clinical practice guidelines.AGREE协作计划:推进临床实践指南的十年
Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 15;9:103. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0103-2.
How appropriate is treating patients diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer with anticancer drugs? A multicenter retrospective cohort Spanish study.
对于诊断为晚期食管癌的患者,使用抗癌药物治疗是否合适?一项多中心回顾性队列西班牙研究。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Oct;26(10):2629-2639. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03436-1. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
4
Chinese herbal medicine and COVID-19: quality evaluation of clinical guidelines and expert consensus and analysis of key recommendations.中药与新型冠状病毒肺炎:临床指南与专家共识的质量评估及关键建议分析
Acupunct Herb Med. 2022 Sep;2(3):152-161. doi: 10.1097/HM9.0000000000000043. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX tool.评估西班牙肿瘤内科学会(SEOM)指南的方法学优势和局限性:使用 AGREE II 和 AGREE-REX 工具进行批判性评估。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Jan;26(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03219-0. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
6
Treatments for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines.非小细胞肺癌治疗:临床实践指南的系统质量评估。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2023 Dec;25(12):3541-3555. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03223-4. Epub 2023 May 30.
7
Polyphyllin I suppresses the gastric cancer growth by promoting cancer cell ferroptosis.重楼皂苷I通过促进癌细胞铁死亡抑制胃癌生长。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 4;14:1145407. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1145407. eCollection 2023.