Suppr超能文献

创伤性牙外伤临床实践指南的系统评价。

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for traumatic dental injuries.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Dental Sciences, Centre for Early Childhood Caries Research (CECCRe), Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Porur, Chennai, 600116, India.

Centre of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Dent Traumatol. 2023 Aug;39(4):371-380. doi: 10.1111/edt.12838. Epub 2023 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are considered a public health problem due to their high prevalence and associated physical, economic, psychological and social consequences. Hence, good Clinical Practice Guidelines are essential to achieving a favourable prognosis. The aim of this review was to appraise the existing Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) on TDI using AGREE II and AGREE-REX.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search for existing guidelines on TDI was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, National Institute for Health Care Excellence, BMJ Best Practice, Trip database, Guideline International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, World Health Organisation, Web of Science and 'Ministry of Health worldwide' databases. Four appraisers independently appraised the included CPGs. The AGREE II tool was applied to assess the methodological quality, while AGREE REX assessed the quality of recommendations of the included guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 7736 titles screened, three guidelines, namely the International Association of Dental Traumatology Guidelines (IADT), and the Italian and Malaysian guidelines, were included for the final analysis. These guidelines were published between 2019 and 2020. The AGREE II analysis demonstrated scores above 80% for the IADT and Italian guidelines for the scope and purpose domain. Overall, the Malaysian guidelines achieved the highest score for all domains. The AGREE REX analysis indicated variability in implementation across the nine items, with five that scored above the midpoint of 4.0 on the response scale. Both the Italian and the IADT guidelines had a similar score for the values and preference domains (36.36%).

CONCLUSIONS

Several deficiencies exist in the methodological quality of existing CPGs on TDI. Future guidelines should consider improvements for domains such as 'rigour of development', 'stakeholder involvement' and 'applicability' to overcome the existing limitations.

摘要

背景/目的:外伤性牙损伤(TDI)由于其高患病率以及相关的身体、经济、心理和社会后果,被认为是一个公共卫生问题。因此,良好的临床实践指南对于实现有利的预后至关重要。本研究旨在使用 AGREE II 和 AGREE-REX 评估现有的 TDI 临床实践指南。

材料和方法

系统地在 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、ProQuest、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所、BMJ Best Practice、Trip 数据库、指南国际网络、苏格兰校际指南网络、世界卫生组织、Web of Science 和“全球卫生部”数据库中搜索现有的 TDI 指南。四名评估员独立评估纳入的 CPG。AGREE II 工具用于评估方法学质量,而 AGREE-REX 评估纳入指南建议的质量。

结果

在筛选的 7736 个标题中,有 3 个指南,即国际牙外伤协会指南(IADT)和意大利和马来西亚指南,被纳入最终分析。这些指南分别于 2019 年和 2020 年发布。AGREE II 分析表明,IADT 和意大利指南在范围和目的领域的得分均高于 80%。总体而言,马来西亚指南在所有领域的得分最高。AGREE-REX 分析表明,在九个项目中,实施情况存在差异,其中五个项目在响应量表上的得分高于 4.0 的中点。意大利和 IADT 指南在价值观和偏好领域的得分相似(36.36%)。

结论

现有的 TDI 临床实践指南在方法学质量方面存在一些缺陷。未来的指南应考虑在“开发严谨性”、“利益相关者参与”和“适用性”等领域进行改进,以克服现有局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验