Letter to the Editor Regarding: "Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study".
作者信息
Prod'homme C, Touzet L
机构信息
University Lille, CHU Lille, Palliative care unit, 59000, Lille, France.
ETHICS (Experiment, Transhumanism, Human Interactions, Care and Society), EA 7446, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France.
出版信息
Pain Ther. 2022 Jun;11(2):739-742. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00368-y. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Letter to the Editor Regarding: "Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study".致编辑的信：关于“直至死亡的持续镇静期间的神经生理学评估对观察性评估的有效性提出质疑：一项前瞻性观察性研究”
Pain Ther. 2022 Jun;11(2):739-742. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00368-y. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
2
A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding "Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study".对《致编辑的信：关于“直至死亡的持续镇静期间的神经生理学评估对观察性评估的有效性提出质疑：一项前瞻性观察性研究”》的回应
Pain Ther. 2022 Jun;11(2):743-746. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00369-x. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
3
Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study.持续镇静直至死亡期间的神经生理学评估对观察性评估的有效性提出质疑：一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):377-390. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00214-z. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
4
Comfort in palliative sedation (Compas): a transdisciplinary mixed method study protocol for linking objective assessments to subjective experiences.姑息性镇静中的舒适度（Compas）：一项跨学科混合方法研究方案，旨在将客观评估与主观体验联系起来。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Apr 18;17(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0316-2.
5
End-of-life Comfort Evaluation, is Clinic Enough? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Combined Comfort Evaluation with and Clinic in non-Communicative Patients.临终舒适评估，临床评估足够吗？非言语患者采用 和临床相结合的舒适评估回顾性队列研究。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Apr;39(2):122-128. doi: 10.1177/08258597211063687. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Attitudes of Professional Caregivers and Family Members Regarding the Use of Monitoring Devices to Improve Assessments of Pain and Discomfort During Continuous Sedation Until Death.专业护理人员和家属对使用监测设备来改善持续镇静直至死亡期间疼痛和不适评估的态度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Aug;60(2):390-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Monitoring nociception and awareness during palliative sedation: A systematic review.监测姑息性镇静治疗中的疼痛感知和意识：系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;35(8):1407-1420. doi: 10.1177/02692163211022943. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
8
Should we include monitors to improve assessment of awareness and pain in unconscious palliatively sedated patients? A case report.我们是否应该使用监测仪来改善无意识接受姑息性镇静治疗患者的意识和疼痛评估？病例报告。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jun;33(6):712-716. doi: 10.1177/0269216319835149. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
Correlation Between Observational Scales of Sedation and Comfort and Bispectral Index Scores.镇静与舒适度观察量表与脑电双频指数评分之间的相关性
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Aug;54(2):186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.335. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
10
Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: a systematized review.用于评估手术麻醉患者痛觉的 Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) 和 Nociception Level Index (NOL) 的有效性描述：系统评价。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Jun;36(3):623-635. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00772-3. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
本文引用的文献
1
End-of-life Comfort Evaluation, is Clinic Enough? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Combined Comfort Evaluation with and Clinic in non-Communicative Patients.临终舒适评估，临床评估足够吗？非言语患者采用 和临床相结合的舒适评估回顾性队列研究。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Apr;39(2):122-128. doi: 10.1177/08258597211063687. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
2
Monitoring nociception and awareness during palliative sedation: A systematic review.监测姑息性镇静治疗中的疼痛感知和意识：系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;35(8):1407-1420. doi: 10.1177/02692163211022943. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
3
How to measure the effects and potential adverse events of palliative sedation? An integrative review.如何衡量姑息性镇静的效果和潜在不良事件？一项综合综述。
Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):295-314. doi: 10.1177/0269216320974264. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
4
Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study.持续镇静直至死亡期间的神经生理学评估对观察性评估的有效性提出质疑：一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):377-390. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00214-z. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Attitudes of Professional Caregivers and Family Members Regarding the Use of Monitoring Devices to Improve Assessments of Pain and Discomfort During Continuous Sedation Until Death.专业护理人员和家属对使用监测设备来改善持续镇静直至死亡期间疼痛和不适评估的态度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Aug;60(2):390-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
6
Should we include monitors to improve assessment of awareness and pain in unconscious palliatively sedated patients? A case report.我们是否应该使用监测仪来改善无意识接受姑息性镇静治疗患者的意识和疼痛评估？病例报告。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jun;33(6):712-716. doi: 10.1177/0269216319835149. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Comfort in palliative sedation (Compas): a transdisciplinary mixed method study protocol for linking objective assessments to subjective experiences.姑息性镇静中的舒适度（Compas）：一项跨学科混合方法研究方案，旨在将客观评估与主观体验联系起来。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Apr 18;17(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0316-2.
8
Measurement of Heart Rate Variability to Assess Pain in Sedated Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.测量心率变异性以评估镇静的危重症患者的疼痛：一项前瞻性观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147720. eCollection 2016.
9
Heart rate variability analysis as an index of emotion regulation processes: interest of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI).心率变异性分析作为情绪调节过程的指标：镇痛伤害感受指数（ANI）的意义
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:3432-5. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346703.
10
From pain to stress evaluation using heart rate variability analysis: development of an evaluation platform.从疼痛到使用心率变异性分析进行压力评估：一个评估平台的开发
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:3852-5. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627661.
Zotero 插件