Neaux Dimitri, Harbers Hugo, Blanc Barbara, Ortiz Katia, Locatelli Yann, Herrel Anthony, Debat Vincent, Cucchi Thomas
Archéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements, UMR 7209, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle CNRS, Paris, France.
Laboratoire Paléontologie Evolution Paléoécosystèmes Paléoprimatologie, UMR 7262, Université de Poitiers CNRS, Poitiers, France.
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2022 Dec;338(8):575-585. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.23130. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
Deciphering the plastic (i.e., nonheritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archeological record is challenging. Previous studies detected morphological markers associated with captivity in the cranium, mandible, and calcaneus of adult wild boar (Sus scrofa) but the developmental trajectories leading up to these changes during ontogeny remain unknown. To assess the impact of growth in a captive environment on morphological structures during postnatal ontogeny, we used an experimental approach focusing on the same three structures and taxon. We investigated the form and size differences of captive-reared and wild-caught wild boar during growth using three-dimensional landmark-based geometric morphometrics. Our results provide evidence of an influence of captivity on the morphology of craniomandibular structures, as wild specimens are smaller than captive individuals at similar ages. The food resources inherent to anthropogenic environments may explain some of the observed differences between captive-reared and wild specimens. The calcaneus presents a different contrasted pattern of plasticity as captive and wild individuals differ in terms of form but not in terms of size. The physically more constrained nature of the calcaneus and the direct influence of mobility reduction on this bone may explain these discrepancies. These results provide new methodological perspectives for bioarchaeological approaches as they imply that the plastic mark of captivity can be observed in juvenile specimens in the same way it has been previously described in adults.
解读考古记录中人类对野生动物控制所引发的可塑性(即非遗传性)变化颇具挑战性。先前的研究在成年野猪(Sus scrofa)的颅骨、下颌骨和跟骨中检测到了与圈养相关的形态学标记,但在个体发育过程中导致这些变化的发育轨迹仍不为人知。为了评估圈养环境下生长对出生后个体发育期间形态结构的影响,我们采用了一种聚焦于相同三种结构和分类单元的实验方法。我们使用基于三维地标点的几何形态测量学,研究了圈养饲养和野生捕获的野猪在生长过程中的形态和大小差异。我们的结果证明了圈养对颅颌结构形态有影响,因为在相似年龄时,野生样本比圈养个体小。人为环境中固有的食物资源或许可以解释圈养饲养和野生样本之间观察到的一些差异。跟骨呈现出一种不同的可塑性对比模式,因为圈养和野生个体在形态方面存在差异,但在大小方面并无差异。跟骨在物理上受到更多限制的性质以及活动减少对这块骨头的直接影响或许可以解释这些差异。这些结果为生物考古学方法提供了新的方法论视角,因为它们意味着圈养的可塑性标记可以在幼年样本中以与先前在成年样本中所描述的相同方式被观察到。