Topoluk Natasha, Kieffer Hannah, Sutter Heather, Fayn Evgueni, Pagel Paul S, Almassi G Hossein
Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Apr;93:106924. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.106924. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
Right ventricular pacemaker lead perforation is a rare but well documented complication of pacemaker implantation. Lead perforation can cause an array of symptoms ranging from none to hemodynamic instability and tamponade. In previously reported cases, lead perforation has always been able to be confirmed by imaging, with computed tomography (CT) scan considered to be the gold standard diagnostic imaging modality.
An 80-year-old male underwent uncomplicated implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome as an outpatient. Thirty-nine days later, the patient presented to the emergency department complaining of new-onset, left-sided, pleuritic chest pain. He was found to have unilateral hemothorax and abnormal pacemaker lead interrogation. Pacemaker lead perforation was suspected but not confirmed with imaging. Lead perforation was only identified after surgical exploration.
This patient had multiple risk factors for pacemaker lead perforation. However, imaging, including CT scan was unable to confirm perforation. The presence of an otherwise unexplained left hemothorax strongly suggested that surgical intervention was indicated. The lead perforation was subsequently confirmed with subxiphoid exploration of the pericardial space. The mechanism of lead perforation resulting in hemothorax in this case is not straight forward, as no direct communication between the pericardial and pleural spaces was identified. However, previously described visceral pericardial self-sealing may contribute to the small pericardial accumulation described herein.
This patient's presentation and clinical course underscore the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for pacemaker lead perforation despite a lack of confirmation with imaging.
右心室起搏器导线穿孔是起搏器植入术一种罕见但有充分文献记载的并发症。导线穿孔可引发一系列症状,从无症状到血流动力学不稳定及心包填塞。在既往报道的病例中,导线穿孔总能通过影像学检查得以确诊,计算机断层扫描(CT)被认为是金标准诊断成像方式。
一名80岁男性门诊接受了双腔起搏器植入术,用于治疗病态窦房结综合征,过程顺利。39天后,患者因新发左侧胸膜炎性胸痛就诊于急诊科。发现其有单侧血胸且起搏器导线问询异常。怀疑有起搏器导线穿孔,但影像学检查未确诊。仅在手术探查后才确定导线穿孔。
该患者有多个发生起搏器导线穿孔的危险因素。然而,包括CT扫描在内的影像学检查未能确诊穿孔。存在无法解释的左侧血胸强烈提示需要进行手术干预。随后通过剑突下心包腔探查证实了导线穿孔。本病例中导致血胸的导线穿孔机制并不明确,因为未发现心包腔与胸膜腔之间有直接连通。然而,先前描述的心包脏层自我封闭可能导致了此处所述的少量心包积液。
该患者的临床表现及临床病程强调了即便影像学检查未确诊,仍需高度怀疑起搏器导线穿孔的重要性。