Research Group PAIDI CTS-1019 "MELES - Nursing Methods and Standard Languages", Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
16778Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Nursing and Physiotherapy Department, Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580211060143. doi: 10.1177/00469580211060143.
Healthcare professionals often use multimedia patient education media, but not all have the same content quality. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health to the Spanish setting and assess its psychometric properties. A methodological validation study was carried out between January and September 2020. Data collection took place from May to June 2020. A translation, back translation, committee review, and pre-testing was carried out. Subsequently, reliability (internal consistency), and validity (factorial and convergent) were assessed by requiring 210 Healthcare Professionals to complete the instrument based on video material. In addition, a refinement of the instrument was conducted based on the modification indexes. The instrument showed adequate internal consistency, although some redundancy in the items (α = .93). Exploratory factor analysis suggested a unifactorial structure that explained an adequate variance (47.37%). Convergent validity was poor (r = .11; = .05). After analysis, 6 items were deleted without impairing the validity results and eliminating redundancy. Therefore, a 12-item version of the instrument was created. It can help to assess more objectively the contents of the materials prescribed, facilitating the choice of those of higher quality and potentially improving their patients' health outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm the previous results and reassess some of the shortcomings.
医疗保健专业人员经常使用多媒体患者教育媒体,但并非所有媒体都具有相同的内容质量。本研究旨在对西班牙的《健康教育内容验证工具》进行跨文化适应性改编,并评估其心理测量学特性。2020 年 1 月至 9 月进行了方法学验证研究。数据收集于 2020 年 5 月至 6 月进行。进行了翻译、回译、委员会审查和预测试。随后,要求 210 名医疗保健专业人员根据视频材料完成该工具,以评估其可靠性(内部一致性)和有效性(因子和收敛)。此外,还根据修正指标对该工具进行了改进。该工具显示出足够的内部一致性,尽管项目存在一些冗余(α=.93)。探索性因素分析表明,单因素结构可以解释足够的方差(47.37%)。收敛效度较差(r =.11; =.05)。经过分析,删除了 6 个项目,而没有损害有效性结果并消除了冗余。因此,创建了一个 12 项的工具版本。它可以帮助更客观地评估规定材料的内容,促进选择质量更高的材料,并有可能改善患者的健康结果。需要进一步的研究来确认之前的结果,并重新评估一些不足之处。