• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measuring the quality of mental health services from the patient perspective in China: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the World Health Organization responsiveness performance questionnaire.从患者角度衡量中国的心理健康服务质量:世界卫生组织反应性能问卷中文版的心理测量学评估。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2035503. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2035503.
2
Reliability and validity of a Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire in Iran.伊朗心理健康系统反应性问卷的信度和效度
Glob Health Action. 2014 Jul 28;7:24748. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.24748. eCollection 2014.
3
The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation.世界卫生组织生活质量测定量表-老年人模块(WHOQOL-OLD)中文版:心理测量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Sep 16;11:156. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-156.
4
The Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) Family Impact Module: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation.《儿科生活质量量表™(PedsQL™)家庭影响模块中文版:跨文化调适与心理计量评估》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Mar 23;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-16.
5
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Quality OF Life Radiation Therapy Instrument and the Head & Neck Module (QOL-RTI/H&N).生活质量放疗工具中文版(QOL-RTI/H&N)的翻译和验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 14;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-51.
6
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Recovery Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ) among mental health providers: a questionnaire survey.心理健康服务提供者中《康复态度问卷》(RAQ)日语版的心理测量学特性:一项问卷调查
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 16;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0740-x.
7
How does mental health care perform in respect to service users' expectations? Evaluating inpatient and outpatient care in Germany with the WHO responsiveness concept.心理健康护理在满足服务使用者期望方面表现如何?运用世界卫生组织的反应性概念对德国的住院和门诊护理进行评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 2;7:99. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-99.
8
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
9
Development and validation of the Chinese surgical inpatient satisfaction and comfort questionnaire.中文外科住院患者满意度和舒适度问卷的编制和验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 30;100(52):e28363. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028363.
10
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表在埃塞俄比亚农村重症精神障碍患者中的效度验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 5;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0647-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire for Psychiatric Outpatients: Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Approaches.精神科门诊患者心理健康系统反应性问卷中文版的心理测量学评价:经典测验理论与项目反应理论方法
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Mar 24;19:729-740. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S503016. eCollection 2025.
2
A comparison of patient-reported quality between inpatient services for mental and physical health: A tertiary-hospital-based survey in China.精神与身体健康住院服务中患者报告的质量比较:一项基于中国三级医院的调查
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 9;14:1090892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1090892. eCollection 2023.
3
Patients' and family members' experiences of psychiatric inpatient services in China: a comparison based on a dyadic design.患者及其家属对中国精神科住院服务的体验:基于对偶设计的比较。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;57(10):2119-2129. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02296-w. Epub 2022 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature.卫生系统响应性:全球文献系统证据制图综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 May 1;20(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01447-w.
2
Perceived health-care quality in China: a comparison of second- and third-tier hospitals.中国感知的医疗保健质量:二级和三级医院的比较。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 5;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab027.
3
Barriers to Professional Mental Health Help-Seeking Among Chinese Adults: A Systematic Review.中国成年人寻求专业心理健康帮助的障碍:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 20;11:442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00442. eCollection 2020.
4
Proxy reliability of the 12-item world health organization disability assessment schedule II among adult patients with mental disorders.12 项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表 II 在成年精神障碍患者中的代理可靠性。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Aug;29(8):2219-2229. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02474-w. Epub 2020 May 9.
5
Comparison Of Expectations For Health Services Between Inpatients From Mental Health Department And Endocrinology Department In China.中国精神科与内分泌科住院患者对医疗服务期望的比较
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Oct 25;13:1851-1860. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S224071. eCollection 2019.
6
Technological Interventions for Medication Adherence in Adult Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review.成人心理健康和物质使用障碍中药物依从性的技术干预措施:一项系统综述。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Mar 12;6(3):e12493. doi: 10.2196/12493.
7
Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study.中国精神障碍的患病率:一项横断面流行病学研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;6(3):211-224. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30511-X. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
8
Satisfaction of psychiatric inpatients in China: clinical and institutional correlates in a national sample.中国住院精神病人的满意度:全国样本的临床和机构相关性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2011-0.
9
Assessment and determinants of patient satisfaction with mental health care.患者对精神卫生保健满意度的评估及决定因素
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):30-31. doi: 10.1002/wps.20586.
10
Integrated mental health services in China: challenges and planning for the future.中国的精神卫生服务整合:未来的挑战与规划。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):107-122. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx137.

从患者角度衡量中国的心理健康服务质量:世界卫生组织反应性能问卷中文版的心理测量学评估。

Measuring the quality of mental health services from the patient perspective in China: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the World Health Organization responsiveness performance questionnaire.

机构信息

Research Center for Public Health and Social Security, School of Public Administration, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2035503. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2035503.

DOI:10.1080/16549716.2022.2035503
PMID:35289731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8928838/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the large population of patients with mental disorders and the rapid development of mental health services in China, there are few evaluations of Chinese mental health services from the patient perspective. Relevant instruments with robust psychometric properties are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to translate, adapt and validate the WHO responsiveness performance questionnaire for measuring the quality of hospital mental health services among Chinese patients.

METHODS

The adaption of the translated questionnaire incorporated experts' and patients' opinions. For psychometric testing, 193 outpatients and 168 inpatients completed outpatient and inpatient modules, respectively.

RESULTS

The adapted questionnaire adhered to the WHO framework of responsiveness domains, and just four items had some wording changes. Item missing rates were below 6%. Both the outpatient and inpatient modules had acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.837 and 0.730) and most domains had desirable average inter-item correlation coefficients. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable model fit for the inpatient module, while some goodness-of-fit indices for the outpatient module were a little outside of the recommended ranges. Except for 'talking privately' from the domain of confidentiality (both outpatient and inpatient modules) and 'waiting time' from the domain of prompt attention (the inpatient module), factor loadings of all other items were above 0.5.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of the responsiveness performance questionnaire has acceptable feasibility, reliability, and validity in general and it can be used to measure, assess and improve the quality of mental health services in China.

摘要

背景

尽管中国有大量精神障碍患者,精神卫生服务也在快速发展,但从患者角度评价中国精神卫生服务的研究却很少,缺乏具有良好信度和效度的相关工具。

目的

本研究旨在翻译、修订并验证世界卫生组织反应性表现问卷,以评估中国患者对医院精神卫生服务的质量。

方法

采用专家和患者意见对翻译后的问卷进行调整。对 193 名门诊患者和 168 名住院患者分别进行门诊和住院模块的心理测量学测试。

结果

调整后的问卷符合世界卫生组织反应性领域框架,只有 4 个条目有一些措辞上的变化。项目缺失率低于 6%。门诊和住院模块的内部一致性均可以接受(Cronbach's α 值分别为 0.837 和 0.730),大多数领域的平均项目间相关系数也令人满意。验证性因子分析表明,住院模块的模型拟合度可以接受,而门诊模块的一些拟合优度指数略低于推荐范围。除了保密性领域的“私下交谈”(门诊和住院模块)和及时性领域的“等候时间”(住院模块)外,其他所有条目的因子负荷均高于 0.5。

结论

中文版反应性表现问卷具有良好的可行性、信度和效度,可用于评估和改善中国的精神卫生服务质量。