DICATAM - Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, Universita degli Studi di Brescia, via Branze 43, 25123, Brescia, Italy E-mail:
Water Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;85(5):1673-1687. doi: 10.2166/wst.2022.052.
An assessment was performed for elucidating the possible impact of different aeration strategies on the carbon footprint of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Using a calibrated model, the impact of different aeration strategies was simulated. The ammonia controller tested showed its ability in ensuring effluent ammonia concentrations compliant with regulation along with significant savings on aeration energy, compared to fixed oxygen set point (DO) control strategies. At the same time, nitrous oxide emissions increased due to accumulation of nitrification intermediates. Nevertheless, when coupled with the carbon dioxide emissions due to electrical energy consumption for aeration, the overall carbon footprint was only marginally affected. Using the local average CO emission factor, ammonia control slightly reduced the carbon footprint with respect to the scenario where DO was fixed at 2 mg·L. Conversely, no significant change could be detected when compared against the scenarios where the DO was fixed. Overall, the actual impact of ammonia control on the carbon footprint compared to other aeration strategies was found to be strictly connected to the sources of energy employed, where the larger amount of low CO-emitting energy is, the higher the relative increase in the carbon footprint will be.
评估了不同曝气策略对全规模污水处理厂碳足迹的可能影响。使用校准模型模拟了不同曝气策略的影响。与固定氧设定点 (DO) 控制策略相比,所测试的氨控制器能够确保出水氨浓度符合法规要求,并显著节省曝气能源。同时,由于硝化中间产物的积累,一氧化二氮排放量增加。然而,当与由于曝气用电而导致的二氧化碳排放量结合时,整体碳足迹仅略有影响。使用当地平均 CO 排放因子,与将 DO 固定在 2 mg·L 的情况相比,氨控制略微降低了碳足迹。相反,与 DO 固定的情况相比,未检测到明显变化。总体而言,与其他曝气策略相比,氨控制对碳足迹的实际影响严格取决于所使用的能源来源,其中低 CO 排放能源的数量越多,碳足迹的相对增加就越高。