• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估不同照护环境下具有不同照护需求的老年人日常生活偏好的工具:证据图谱。

Instruments for assessing the preferences for everyday living of older people with various care needs across different care settings: an evidence map.

机构信息

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453 Witten, Germany; Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453 Witten, Germany.

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453 Witten, Germany; Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453 Witten, Germany.

出版信息

Geriatr Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;45:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.02.026. Epub 2022 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.02.026
PMID:35290858
Abstract

Considering the preferences for everyday living of older people with various care needs across different care settings is important in nursing care. Currently, there is no systematic overview of the various instruments, and it is unclear what instruments exist, and which preferences they measure. We systematically searched for studies in the electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo. Title/abstract and full text screening were performed independently by two researchers. We mapped and described the identified instruments in two tables and one interactive evidence atlas. We identified 67 instruments for assessing the preferences for everyday living of older people with various care needs across different care settings. We clustered the identified instruments into two main categories: broad and specific. The results show a wide range of instrument types and assessment methods. Research gaps exist, for instruments developed for assessing preferences comprehensively for a particular topic for everyday living, particular populations, and settings.

摘要

考虑到不同护理环境中具有不同护理需求的老年人的日常生活偏好,这在护理中很重要。目前,尚无各种工具的系统概述,也不清楚存在哪些工具以及它们测量哪些偏好。我们系统地在电子数据库 MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 PsycInfo 中搜索了研究。标题/摘要和全文筛选由两名研究人员独立进行。我们在两个表格和一个交互式证据地图中对确定的工具进行了映射和描述。我们确定了 67 种评估不同护理环境中具有不同护理需求的老年人日常生活偏好的工具。我们将确定的工具分为两大类:广泛和具体。结果表明,仪器类型和评估方法多种多样。在为特定主题、特定人群和特定环境全面评估偏好而开发的仪器方面,存在研究空白。

相似文献

1
Instruments for assessing the preferences for everyday living of older people with various care needs across different care settings: an evidence map.评估不同照护环境下具有不同照护需求的老年人日常生活偏好的工具:证据图谱。
Geriatr Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;45:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.02.026. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
2
Instruments for assessing the preferences for everyday living of older people with various care needs: protocol for an evidence map.评估具有不同护理需求的老年人日常活动偏好的工具:证据图谱的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 7;11(9):e048921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048921.
3
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Preferences for everyday living inventory (PELI): study protocol for piloting a culture-sensitive and setting-specific translated instrument in German care settings (PELI-D).日常生活偏好量表(PELI):在德国护理环境中对文化敏感且特定环境的翻译工具进行试点研究的方案(PELI-D)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 7;10(1):e030268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030268.
6
7
Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.提供以患者为中心的护理:长期服务和支持接受者的重要偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
8
[Translation and culture sensitive adaptation of the PELI ("Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory") for nursing settings].[用于护理环境的PELI(“日常生活偏好量表”)的翻译及文化敏感调适]
Pflege. 2022 Feb;35(1):49-56. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000824. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Systematic review of 29 self-report instruments for assessing quality of life in older adults receiving aged care services.对 29 种用于评估接受老年护理服务的老年人生活质量的自我报告工具的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 18;11(11):e050892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050892.

引用本文的文献

1
There is no one size fits all: Elements of implementing virtual bike rides to address loneliness in people living with dementia.没有一刀切的方法:实施虚拟自行车骑行以解决痴呆症患者孤独感的要素。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 26;10:20552076241277886. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277886. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
"This is Slowly Becoming my Interest…": The Understanding of Leisure and Preferences for Leisure Activities of People Receiving Adult Day Services.“这正逐渐成为我的兴趣……”:接受成人日间服务人群对休闲的理解和对休闲活动的偏好。
Res Aging. 2024 Mar-Apr;46(3-4):210-227. doi: 10.1177/01640275231221162. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Exploration of the Content and Structure of Preferences for Leisure Activities of People Receiving Adult Day Services Using Concept Mapping.
使用概念映射探索接受成人日间服务人群对休闲活动偏好的内容和结构。
Gerontologist. 2024 May 1;64(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad142.
4
Mapping implementation strategies of evidence-based interventions for three preselected phenomena in people with dementia-a scoping review.痴呆症患者三种预先选定现象的循证干预措施映射实施策略——一项范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Aug 28;4(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00486-4.
5
Counseling regarding the care of people with dementia with a focus on §7a SGB XI in Germany: a "gray-shaded" scoping review.德国针对痴呆症患者护理的咨询:以《社会法典》第 7a 章为重点的“灰色地带”范围界定综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09155-7.
6
Consulting concepts and structures for people with dementia in Germany: a protocol for a 'grey-shaded' scoping review.德国痴呆症患者的咨询理念和结构:一项“灰色地带”范围综述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e059771. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059771.