Schneider A, Fasshauer E, Scheiderbauer J, Warnke C, Köpke S, Kasper J, Toussaint M, Temmes H, Hemmer B, Schiffmann I, Rahn A C, Heesen C
Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Deutsche Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft, Bundesverband e.V. (German MS Society Federal Association [DMSG]), Hannover, Germany.
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Apr;60:103728. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103728. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Multiple sclerosis treatment options are increasing. Evidence-based patient information (EBPI) are therefore crucial to enable patient involvement in decision making. Based on earlier work on decision support, patient information handbooks on 8 MS immunotherapies were developed, piloted and evaluated with support from the German Clinical Competence Network MS and the German MS Society.
Handbooks were structured according to EBPI concepts. Drafts were commented by patient representatives and neurologists with an MS expertise. Executive boards of the German MS Society and the Competence Network as well as pharmaceutical companies' feedback was included. Handbooks were distributed among MS neurologists by the German MS Society. Evaluation followed applying a mixed methods approach with interviews, focus groups and surveys. One survey addressed persons with MS (pwMS) based on a questionnaire included in each handbook. Neurologists who received printed patient handbooks were invited to give feedback in a second survey.
Eight handbooks were developed providing absolute and relative risk information in numbers and figures as well as monitoring needs and drug fact boxes. Despite the high amount of information and the display of low absolute risk reduction rates of treatments, handbooks were overall appreciated by pwMS (n=107) and mostly also by physicians (n=24). For more than 70% of the pwMS the information was new, understandable and supportive for decision making. But patients felt uncomfortable with relative risk information. However, response rates in the evaluation were low, exposing the challenges when implementing EBPI into clinical care. Therefore, conclusions must be considered preliminary.
EBPI on immunotherapies for MS seem feasible and are appreciated by patients and treating neurologists but more implementation research is needed.
多发性硬化症的治疗选择日益增多。因此,基于证据的患者信息对于让患者参与决策至关重要。在德国多发性硬化症临床能力网络和德国多发性硬化症协会的支持下,我们开发、试行并评估了关于8种多发性硬化症免疫疗法的患者信息手册。
手册按照基于证据的患者信息概念进行构建。患者代表和具有多发性硬化症专业知识的神经科医生对手册草稿进行了评论,并纳入了德国多发性硬化症协会执行委员会、能力网络以及制药公司的反馈意见。德国多发性硬化症协会将手册分发给多发性硬化症神经科医生。采用访谈、焦点小组和调查等混合方法进行评估。一项调查基于每本手册中包含的问卷,针对多发性硬化症患者(pwMS)。在第二项调查中,邀请收到印刷版患者手册的神经科医生提供反馈。
共编写了8本手册,以数字和图表形式提供了绝对风险和相对风险信息以及监测需求和药物信息框。尽管信息量很大,且治疗的绝对风险降低率显示较低,但手册总体上得到了pwMS患者(n = 107)的认可,大多数医生(n = 24)也认可。超过70%的pwMS患者认为这些信息是新的、易于理解且有助于决策。但患者对相对风险信息感到困惑。然而,评估中的回复率较低,这凸显了将基于证据的患者信息应用于临床护理时所面临的挑战。因此,结论必须视为初步结论。
关于多发性硬化症免疫疗法的基于证据的患者信息似乎是可行的,并且得到了患者和治疗神经科医生的认可,但还需要更多的实施研究。