• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性硬化症护理中的挑战:一项国际混合方法研究的结果。

Challenges in multiple sclerosis care: Results from an international mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Péloquin Sophie, Schmierer Klaus, Leist Thomas P, Oh Jiwon, Murray Suzanne, Lazure Patrice

机构信息

AXDEV Group Inc., Brossard, Canada.

Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, The Blizard Institute (Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma), London, United Kingdom; Barts Health NHS Trust, Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience), The Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 May;50:102854. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102854. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2021.102854
PMID:33690086
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying treatment (DMT) selection for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is challenging. Neurologists and advanced practice nurses (APNs) in MS care may be facing knowledge and confidence gaps when screening patients to initiate or switch between DMTs, assessing the safety of new DMTs and monitoring for adverse events. Healthcare providers are required to demonstrate enhanced patient communication skills, to share treatment decisions and assess treatment adherence. To better inform educational interventions, there is a need to better understand these challenges and uncover their causalities. We undertook an international study across seven countries to identify challenges for neurologists and APNs that may impact DMT choices and optimum care for people with MS (pwMS).

METHODS

This mixed methods study involved two concurrent data collection phases, a qualitative phase with semi-structured interviews and a quantitative phase using an online survey. Neurologists (n=333) and APNs (n=135) were recruited from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States. All participants had to have a minimum of two years' experience in the care of pwMS and be currently active in clinical practice.

RESULTS

A triangulated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data identified multiple challenges. For APNs, these mainly related to diagnosing MS, integrating new agents in their practice, sequential DMT selection, treatment monitoring and providing personalized care. Specifically, two-thirds of APNs reported no or basic knowledge of the 2017 McDonald criteria and over half reported a knowledge gap of new DMTs available (51%) and a skill gap when integrating them into practice (58%). APNs expressed a knowledge gap of treatment sequencing (46%) and a skill gap in making decisions about sequencing (62%). Forty-four percent of APNs reported a gap in their skills of integrating patient's goals into treatment recommendations. For neurologists, the main challenges included managing side effects, aligning care to their patient's personal goals and quality of life (QoL). Specifically, over a third of neurologists reported no or basic knowledge of the characteristics of treatment failure (35%), and 32% reported no or basic skills identifying treatment failure. Skills needed to integrate patient's individual goals into treatment recommendations were reported as none or low by 39% of neurologists. In addition, there were significant differences according to years of practice in the majority (9 out of 14) of confidence items with respect to discussing specific MS-related topics with patients. Significant differences between countries were also identified.

CONCLUSION

The complexity of diagnosing MS and the variety of available DMTs for pwMS lead to uncertainties, even among specialized healthcare professionals. These should be addressed through focused education and training to optimize care for pwMS.

摘要

背景

为多发性硬化症(MS)患者选择疾病修正治疗(DMT)具有挑战性。在对MS患者进行护理时,神经科医生和高级执业护士(APN)在筛查患者以启动DMT或在不同DMT之间切换、评估新DMT的安全性以及监测不良事件时,可能面临知识和信心方面的差距。医疗保健提供者需要具备更强的患者沟通技巧,以分享治疗决策并评估治疗依从性。为了更好地为教育干预提供信息,有必要更好地理解这些挑战并找出其因果关系。我们在七个国家开展了一项国际研究,以确定可能影响DMT选择以及对MS患者(pwMS)最佳护理的神经科医生和APN所面临的挑战。

方法

这项混合方法研究包括两个并行的数据收集阶段,一个是采用半结构化访谈的定性阶段,另一个是使用在线调查的定量阶段。从加拿大、法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、英国和美国招募了神经科医生(n = 333)和APN(n = 135)。所有参与者必须在pwMS护理方面至少有两年经验,并且目前仍活跃于临床实践。

结果

对定性和定量数据的三角分析确定了多个挑战。对于APN来说,这些挑战主要与MS诊断、在实践中纳入新药物、序贯DMT选择、治疗监测以及提供个性化护理有关。具体而言,三分之二的APN表示对2017年麦克唐纳标准没有或只有基本了解,超过一半的人表示对可用的新DMT存在知识差距(51%),并且在将它们纳入实践时存在技能差距(58%)。APN表示在治疗排序方面存在知识差距(46%),在做出排序决策方面存在技能差距(62%)。44%的APN报告在将患者目标纳入治疗建议的技能方面存在差距。对于神经科医生来说,主要挑战包括管理副作用、使护理与患者的个人目标和生活质量(QoL)保持一致。具体而言,超过三分之一的神经科医生表示对治疗失败的特征没有或只有基本了解(35%),32%的人表示没有或只有基本技能来识别治疗失败。39%的神经科医生报告在将患者的个人目标纳入治疗建议所需的技能方面没有或水平较低。此外,在与患者讨论特定MS相关主题的大多数(14项中的9项)信心项目上,根据执业年限存在显著差异。各国之间也存在显著差异。

结论

MS诊断的复杂性以及pwMS可用DMT的多样性导致了不确定性,即使在专业医疗保健专业人员中也是如此。应通过有针对性的教育和培训来解决这些问题,以优化对pwMS的护理。

相似文献

1
Challenges in multiple sclerosis care: Results from an international mixed-methods study.多发性硬化症护理中的挑战:一项国际混合方法研究的结果。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 May;50:102854. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102854. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
2
Clinical decision-making in multiple sclerosis: Challenges reported internationally with emerging treatment complexity.多发性硬化症的临床决策:随着治疗复杂性的增加,国际上报道的挑战。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 Jul;4(4):320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 22.
3
Implementing Shared Decision-Making for Multiple Sclerosis: The MS-SUPPORT Tool.实施多发性硬化症的共享决策:MS-SUPPORT 工具。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Dec;80:105092. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105092. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
4
The importance of the patient's perspective in decision-making in multiple sclerosis: Results of the OwnMS patient perspectives study.多发性硬化症决策中患者视角的重要性:OwnMS 患者观点研究结果。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Jul;75:104757. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104757. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Results from SPECTRUM: A survey of healthcare professionals to understand current diagnosis and management practices for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.SPECTRUM 研究结果:一项调查医疗保健专业人员以了解英国继发进展型多发性硬化症的当前诊断和管理实践。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Oct;55:103174. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103174. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
6
Identifying the educational needs of physicians in pediatric epilepsy in order to improve care: results from a needs assessment in Germany, Spain, and the United States.识别小儿癫痫领域医生的教育需求以改善医疗服务:德国、西班牙和美国需求评估的结果
Epileptic Disord. 2018 Aug 1;20(4):239-256. doi: 10.1684/epd.2018.0989.
7
Advanced practice nursing implementation in France: A mixed-method study.法国的高级实践护理实施:一项混合方法研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Dec;80(12):5076-5089. doi: 10.1111/jan.16303. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
8
Measuring the effects of nurse practitioner (NP)-led care on depression and anxiety levels in people with multiple sclerosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.测量护士从业者(NP)主导的护理对多发性硬化症患者抑郁和焦虑水平的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Nov 8;22(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05726-3.
9
A Targeted Literature Search and Phenomenological Review of Perspectives of People with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthcare Professionals of the Immunology of Disease-Modifying Therapies.对多发性硬化症患者及医疗保健专业人员关于疾病修饰疗法免疫学观点的针对性文献检索与现象学综述
Neurol Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):955-979. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00349-5. Epub 2022 May 24.
10
Treatment selection and experience in multiple sclerosis: survey of neurologists.多发性硬化症的治疗选择与经验:神经科医生调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Apr 3;8:415-22. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S53140. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple sclerosis patients' journey delay in diagnosis and treatment: a multicenter study.多发性硬化症患者诊断和治疗的旅程延误:一项多中心研究。
BMC Neurol. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04172-x.
2
Evaluating patient care in multiple sclerosis: Impact of combined digital tools and holistic management strategies.评估多发性硬化症患者的护理:数字工具与整体管理策略相结合的影响。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2025 Apr 15;11(2):20552173251317020. doi: 10.1177/20552173251317020. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Patient and Physician Perspectives of Treatment Burden in Multiple Sclerosis.
多发性硬化症患者与医生对治疗负担的看法
Neurol Ther. 2024 Dec;13(6):1507-1525. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00654-1. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
4
The Clinical Nurse Practitioner's Essential Role in Early Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis in Europe: A Consensus Report.欧洲临床护士从业者在多发性硬化症早期诊断与管理中的关键作用:一份共识报告。
Int J MS Care. 2024 Aug 5;26(Q3):208-213. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2023-070. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption.早期在美国多发性硬化症中使用高效疗法:益处、障碍和鼓励采用的策略。
J Neurol. 2024 Jun;271(6):3116-3130. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12305-4. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
6
Treatment satisfaction with disease-modifying therapy is the only predictor of Adherence among multiple sclerosis patients from Upper Egypt.治疗满意度是改善多发性硬化症患者治疗依从性的唯一预测因素,本研究来自埃及上埃及地区。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 25;14(1):7027. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57116-9.
7
Male sexual and reproductive health in multiple sclerosis: a scoping review.多发性硬化症中的男性性与生殖健康:一项范围综述
J Neurol. 2024 May;271(5):2169-2181. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12250-2. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
8
Experiences of being treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for aggressive multiple sclerosis: A qualitative interview study.自体造血干细胞移植治疗侵袭性多发性硬化症的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 7;19(2):e0297573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297573. eCollection 2024.
9
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as a Clinical Assessment Tool for Multiple Sclerosis: Clinician and Patient Perspectives [Narrative Review].无疾病活动证据(NEDA)作为多发性硬化症的临床评估工具:临床医生和患者视角[叙述性综述]
Neurol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):1909-1935. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00549-7. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
10
Exploring physicians' prescribing behavior in patients with multiple sclerosis in Saudi Arabia: a sequential explanatory mixed-methods.探索沙特阿拉伯多发性硬化症患者中医生的处方行为:一项序贯解释性混合方法研究。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Mar 31;23(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03184-9.