Calvo-Henriquez Christian, Martínez-Seijas Pedro, Boronat-Catalá Borja, Faraldo-García Ana, Martínez-Capoccioni Gabriel, Alobid Isam, Banegassi Ivan Mendez, Martin-Martin Carlos
Rhinology Study Group of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France; Service of Otolaryngology, Rhinology Unit. Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Service of Maxillofacial Surgery. Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May;156:111094. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111094. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
Nasal obstruction is a common complaint in pediatric otolaryngology. There are several concerns about how nasal obstruction should be measured. This debate is even more important in children, as they can experience difficulties in being sensitive to their symptoms or even expressing them. In this research we aim to explore the ability of children (and their parents) to assess their nasal obstruction.
AND METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was performed. Four cohorts of children were consecutively selected from a third level referral Hospital. Cohort A (children suffering solely turbinate enlargement), B (adenoid enlargement only), and C (adenoid and turbinate enlargement), while cohort D were healthy controls. Children and parents were asked to rate nasal patency through a Likert scale from 0 (no patency, complete obstruction of the nose) to 10 (complete patency, it is easy to breathe through the nose). All participants underwent rhinomanometry. Results of nasal resistance were relativized according to pediatric reference values per each age subgroup.
146 participants were included. Cohort A (54), B (40), C (28), D (24). There is a poor but significant correlation between parents' assessment and nasal resistance (rho = -0.28; p = 0.004). In children, there is no significant correlation with nasal resistance (rho = -0.14; p = 0.17). Stratified by severity, only children (and their parents) with good nasal breathing demonstrated good correlation values with the visual analogue score (VAS). Stratified by age, the correlation is only significant for parents of children older than 12 years old.
This study has demonstrated a good ability to rate nasal patency by healthy children and their parents, but a poor ability for children suffering from impaired nasal breathing. We suggest combining subjective assessment of nasal patency with objective measurements such as rhinomanometry in children.
鼻塞是小儿耳鼻咽喉科常见的主诉。关于如何测量鼻塞存在诸多问题。在儿童中,这场争论更为重要,因为他们可能难以感知自身症状甚至表达症状。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨儿童(及其父母)评估自身鼻塞的能力。
进行了一项观察性横断面研究。从一家三级转诊医院连续选取四组儿童。A组(仅患有鼻甲肿大的儿童)、B组(仅腺样体肿大)和C组(腺样体和鼻甲均肿大),而D组为健康对照。要求儿童及其父母通过李克特量表对鼻通畅程度进行评分,从0分(无通畅,鼻子完全阻塞)到10分(完全通畅,通过鼻子呼吸很容易)。所有参与者均接受鼻阻力测量。根据每个年龄亚组的儿科参考值对鼻阻力结果进行了标准化。
纳入了146名参与者。A组(54名)、B组(40名)、C组(28名)、D组(24名)。父母的评估与鼻阻力之间存在较弱但显著的相关性(rho = -0.28;p = 0.004)。在儿童中,与鼻阻力无显著相关性(rho = -0.14;p = 0.17)。按严重程度分层,只有鼻呼吸良好的儿童(及其父母)与视觉模拟评分(VAS)显示出良好的相关性值。按年龄分层,仅12岁以上儿童的父母的相关性显著。
本研究表明健康儿童及其父母对鼻通畅程度有良好的评分能力,但对于鼻呼吸受损的儿童能力较差。我们建议在儿童中,将鼻通畅程度的主观评估与鼻阻力测量等客观测量方法相结合。