Cisneros Juan Carlos, Raja Nussaïbah B, Ghilardi Aline M, Dunne Emma M, Pinheiro Felipe L, Regalado Fernández Omar Rafael, Sales Marcos A F, Rodríguez-de la Rosa Rubén A, Miranda-Martínez Adriana Y, González-Mora Sergio, Bantim Renan A M, de Lima Flaviana J, Pardo Jason D
Museu de Arqueologia e Paleontologia, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI 64049-550, Brazil.
GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Department of Geography and Geosciences, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Loewenichstr. 28, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Mar 2;9(3):210898. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210898. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Scientific practices stemming from colonialism, whereby middle- and low-income countries supply data for high-income countries and the contributions of local expertise are devalued, are still prevalent today in the field of palaeontology. In response to these unjust practices, countries such as Mexico and Brazil adopted protective laws and regulations during the twentieth century to preserve their palaeontological heritage. However, scientific colonialism is still reflected in many publications describing fossil specimens recovered from these countries. Here, we present examples of 'palaeontological colonialism' from publications on Jurassic-Cretaceous fossils from NE Mexico and NE Brazil spanning the last three decades. Common issues that we identified in these publications are the absence of both fieldwork and export permit declarations and the lack of local experts among authorships. In Mexico, access to many fossil specimens is restricted on account of these specimens being housed in private collections, whereas a high number of studies on Brazilian fossils are based on specimens illegally reposited in foreign collections, particularly in Germany and Japan. Finally, we outline and discuss the wider academic and social impacts of these research practices, and propose exhaustive recommendations to scientists, journals, museums, research institutions and government and funding agencies in order to overcome these practices.
源于殖民主义的科学实践,即中低收入国家为高收入国家提供数据且当地专业知识的贡献被贬低,在古生物学领域如今依然普遍存在。为应对这些不公正做法,墨西哥和巴西等国在20世纪制定了保护法律法规以保护其古生物学遗产。然而,科学殖民主义仍体现在许多描述从这些国家采集的化石标本的出版物中。在此,我们展示过去三十年来关于墨西哥东北部和巴西东北部侏罗纪 - 白垩纪化石的出版物中的“古生物学殖民主义”实例。我们在这些出版物中发现的常见问题包括缺乏野外工作和出口许可声明,以及作者中没有当地专家。在墨西哥,由于许多化石标本存于私人收藏中,获取这些标本受到限制,而大量关于巴西化石的研究是基于非法存于外国收藏(特别是德国和日本)中的标本。最后,我们概述并讨论了这些研究实践更广泛的学术和社会影响,并向科学家、期刊、博物馆、研究机构以及政府和资助机构提出详尽建议,以克服这些做法。