Nishimura Takaaki, Asai Hitoshi, Nakaizumi Dai, Endo Soma, Inaoka Pleiades Tiharu
Department of Community-based-Rehabilitation, Nanto Municipal Hospital: 938 Inami, Nanto, Toyama 932-0211, Japan.
Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Course of Rehabilitation Science, Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2022 Mar;34(3):218-224. doi: 10.1589/jpts.34.218. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
[Purpose] This study aimed to clarify whether the distribution range of the forward reach distance and the relationship between the forward reach distance and the movement distance of the center of pressure differed depending on whether the controlled starting standing position during the functional reach test with an ankle joint strategy. [Participants and Methods] Sixteen healthy male volunteers participated in the study. The distribution range of the forward reach distance and the relationship between the forward reach distance and movement distance of the center of pressure in the controlled starting standing position and non-controlled starting standing position conditions were analyzed. [Results] The distribution range of the forward reach distance was significantly smaller in the controlled starting standing position than in the non-controlled starting standing position. In both groups, the forward reach distance was associated with the movement distance of the center of pressure. [Conclusion] The findings suggested that the use of an ankle joint strategy with a controlled starting standing position in the functional reach test may be a more accurate method to evaluate standing balance ability.
[目的] 本研究旨在阐明，在采用踝关节策略进行功能性伸展测试时，根据起始站立姿势是否受到控制，向前伸展距离的分布范围以及向前伸展距离与压力中心移动距离之间的关系是否会有所不同。[参与者与方法] 16名健康男性志愿者参与了本研究。分析了在起始站立姿势受控制和不受控制的条件下，向前伸展距离的分布范围以及向前伸展距离与压力中心移动距离之间的关系。[结果] 在起始站立姿势受控制的情况下，向前伸展距离的分布范围显著小于不受控制的情况。在两组中，向前伸展距离均与压力中心的移动距离相关。[结论] 研究结果表明，在功能性伸展测试中采用踝关节策略并控制起始站立姿势，可能是评估站立平衡能力的一种更准确的方法。
