Horak F B, Nashner L M
J Neurophysiol. 1986 Jun;55(6):1369-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.1986.55.6.1369.
We studied the extent to which automatic postural actions in standing human subjects are organized by a limited repertoire of central motor programs. Subjects stood on support surfaces of various lengths, which forced them to adopt different postural movement strategies to compensate for the same external perturbations. We assessed whether a continuum or a limited set of muscle activation patterns was used to produce different movement patterns and the extent to which movement patterns were influenced by prior experience. Exposing subjects standing on a normal support surface to brief forward and backward horizontal surface perturbations elicited relatively stereotyped patterns of leg and trunk muscle activation with 73- to 110-ms latencies. Activity began in the ankle joint muscles and then radiated in sequence to thigh and then trunk muscles on the same dorsal or ventral aspect of the body. This activation pattern exerted compensatory torques about the ankle joints, which restored equilibrium by moving the body center of mass forward or backward. This pattern has been termed the ankle strategy because it restores equilibrium by moving the body primarily around the ankle joints. To successfully maintain balance while standing on a support surface short in relation to foot length, subjects activated leg and trunk muscles at similar latencies but organized the activity differently. The trunk and thigh muscles antagonistic to those used in the ankle strategy were activated in the opposite proximal-to-distal sequence, whereas the ankle muscles were generally unresponsive. This activation pattern produced a compensatory horizontal shear force against the support surface but little, if any, ankle torque. This pattern has been termed the hip strategy, because the resulting motion is focused primarily about the hip joints. Exposing subjects to horizontal surface perturbations while standing on support surfaces intermediate in length between the shortest and longest elicited more complex postural movements and associated muscle activation patterns that resembled ankle and hip strategies combined in different temporal relations. These complex postural movements were executed with combinations of torque and horizontal shear forces and motions of ankle and hip joints. During the first 5-20 practice trials immediately following changes from one support surface length to another, response latencies were unchanged. The activation patterns, however, were complex and resembled the patterns observed during well-practiced stance on surfaces of intermediate lengths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们研究了站立的人体受试者中自动姿势动作在多大程度上由有限的中枢运动程序指令集所组织。受试者站在不同长度的支撑面上,这迫使他们采用不同的姿势运动策略来补偿相同的外部干扰。我们评估了是使用连续的还是有限的一组肌肉激活模式来产生不同的运动模式,以及运动模式受先前经验影响的程度。让站在正常支撑面上的受试者受到短暂的向前和向后的水平表面干扰,会引发腿部和躯干肌肉激活的相对刻板模式,潜伏期为73至110毫秒。活动始于踝关节肌肉,然后依次扩散到大腿,再到身体同一背侧或腹侧的躯干肌肉。这种激活模式在踝关节周围施加补偿性扭矩,通过向前或向后移动身体重心来恢复平衡。这种模式被称为踝关节策略,因为它主要通过围绕踝关节移动身体来恢复平衡。为了在相对于脚长较短的支撑面上成功保持平衡,受试者以相似的潜伏期激活腿部和躯干肌肉,但活动组织方式不同。与踝关节策略中使用的肌肉拮抗的躯干和大腿肌肉以相反的近端到远端顺序被激活,而踝关节肌肉通常没有反应。这种激活模式在支撑面上产生了补偿性水平剪切力,但踝关节扭矩很小(如果有的话)。这种模式被称为髋关节策略,因为产生的运动主要集中在髋关节周围。让受试者站在最短和最长支撑面之间长度适中的支撑面上时受到水平表面干扰,会引发更复杂的姿势运动以及相关的肌肉激活模式,这些模式类似于踝关节和髋关节策略以不同时间关系组合的情况。这些复杂的姿势运动通过扭矩和水平剪切力以及踝关节和髋关节运动的组合来执行。在从一种支撑面长度改变到另一种支撑面长度后的最初5至20次练习试验中,反应潜伏期没有变化。然而,激活模式很复杂,类似于在长度适中的支撑面上熟练站立时观察到的模式。(摘要截断于400字)