Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health.
Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI.
Med Care. 2022 Sep 1;60(9):648-654. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001709. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
Disparities in access to care between non-Hispanic White and Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) patients are often attributed to higher uninsurance rates among AANHPI patients. Less is known about variation among individuals with Medicaid health insurance coverage and among AANHPI subgroups.
The objective of this study was to examine differences in access to care between White and AANHPI adult Medicaid beneficiaries, both in the aggregate and disaggregated into 9 ethnic subgroups (Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Other Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander).
Nationwide Adult Medicaid Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data (2014-2015), a cross-sectional survey representative of all Medicaid beneficiaries.
A total of 126,728 White and 10,089 AANHPI Medicaid beneficiaries were included.
The study outcomes were: (1) having a usual source of care; and (2) reporting a health center or clinic as the usual site of care. Multivariable linear probability models assessed the relationship between race/ethnic subgroup and our outcomes, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and health status.
Compared with White beneficiaries, Korean beneficiaries were significantly less likely to report having a usual source of care [difference=-8.9 percentage points (PP), P =0.01], and Chinese (difference=8.4 PP, P =0.001), Native Hawaiian (difference=25.8 PP, P <0.001), and Pacific Islander (difference=22.2 PP, P =0.001) beneficiaries were significantly more likely to report a health center or clinic as their usual site of care.
Despite similar health insurance coverage, significant differences in access to care remain between White and AANHPI Medicaid beneficiaries. Disaggregated AANHPI data may reveal important variation in access to care and inform more targeted public policies.
非西班牙裔白人和亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民(AANHPI)患者在获得医疗保健方面的差异通常归因于 AANHPI 患者中更高的未参保率。对于拥有医疗补助健康保险的个人以及 AANHPI 亚群之间的差异,了解较少。
本研究旨在检查白人和 AANHPI 成年医疗补助受益人的医疗保健获取方面的差异,包括总体差异和按 9 个族裔亚组(印度裔、华裔、菲律宾裔、日裔、韩裔、越裔、其他亚裔、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民)进行的分类差异。
全国性的成年医疗补助消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统数据(2014-2015 年),这是一项代表所有医疗补助受益人的横断面调查。
共纳入 126728 名白人和 10089 名 AANHPI 医疗补助受益人。
研究结果是:(1)有常规医疗来源;(2)报告健康中心或诊所为常规就诊地点。多变量线性概率模型评估了种族/族裔亚组与我们的研究结果之间的关系,调整了社会人口特征和健康状况。
与白人受益人相比,韩国受益人报告有常规医疗来源的可能性显著降低[差异=-8.9 个百分点(PP),P =0.01],而中国(差异=8.4 PP,P =0.001)、夏威夷原住民(差异=25.8 PP,P <0.001)和太平洋岛民(差异=22.2 PP,P =0.001)受益人报告健康中心或诊所为常规就诊地点的可能性显著增加。
尽管医疗保险覆盖范围相似,但白人和 AANHPI 医疗补助受益人的医疗保健获取方面仍存在显著差异。分解 AANHPI 数据可能会揭示医疗保健获取方面的重要差异,并为更有针对性的公共政策提供信息。