Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 20;40(15):1623-1634. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02669. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
To examine concordance in symptomatic adverse event (AE) grading using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.0) for clinicians and its patient-reported outcome (PRO) versions for children (Ped-PRO-CTCAE) and caregivers (Ped-PRO-CTCAE [Caregiver]).
Children age 7-18 years with a first cancer diagnosis, their clinicians, and caregivers completed CTCAE-based measures before starting a treatment course (T1) and after the treatment (T2). Grades (0-3) were assigned by each reporter for 15 core AEs spanning physical and mental health. Mean grades were compared between reporters using two-sample -tests; agreement was estimated using weighted kappa (κ) statistics. Multivariable mixed regression models were used to evaluate associations of clinical factors with AE reporting concordance. Significance was set at α = .05 (two-sided).
There were 438 child-clinician-caregiver triads with complete data at either T1 or T2. For children, the mean age was 13 years (standard deviation = 3.4), 53.7% were male, 32.6% non-White, and 56.4% had leukemia/lymphoma. At T1, clinician mean AE grades were significantly lower (ie, better) than children for all AEs and remained significantly lower at T2 except for constipation, nausea, anorexia, neuropathy, and anxiety. Caregiver mean AE grades were similar to children at T1 and significantly higher (ie, worse) at T2 for nausea, vomiting, anorexia, pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Agreement for child-clinician grading was poor-to-fair at T1 (κ range, 0.08-0.34) and T2 (0.11-0.35), and for child-caregiver, was fair-to-good at T1 (0.34-0.65) and T2 (0.24-0.60). No factors were consistently associated with reporter concordance across AEs.
Compared with children, symptomatic AEs were consistently under-reported by clinicians with low agreement and over-reported by caregivers with low-moderate agreement. Direct reporting by children using Ped-PRO-CTCAE or similar measures should be routinely incorporated for toxicity assessment in clinical trials.
使用常见不良事件术语标准(CTCAE 4.0)评估临床医生和儿童患者报告结局(PRO)版本(Ped-PRO-CTCAE)以及护理人员(Ped-PRO-CTCAE[护理人员])的症状性不良事件(AE)分级的一致性。
7-18 岁初诊癌症的儿童、其临床医生和护理人员在开始治疗疗程(T1)前和治疗后(T2)完成基于 CTCAE 的测量。每位报告者为 15 项涵盖身心健康的核心 AE 分配等级(0-3 级)。使用两样本 t 检验比较报告者之间的平均等级;使用加权κ(κ)统计数据估计一致性。多变量混合回归模型用于评估临床因素与 AE 报告一致性的关联。显著性水平设为α=0.05(双侧)。
在 T1 或 T2 时,有 438 个儿童-临床医生-护理人员三联体具有完整数据。对于儿童,平均年龄为 13 岁(标准差=3.4),53.7%为男性,32.6%为非白人,56.4%患有白血病/淋巴瘤。在 T1 时,临床医生的平均 AE 等级对于所有 AE 均低于(即更好)儿童,并且除便秘、恶心、厌食、神经病和焦虑外,在 T2 时仍显著较低。护理人员的平均 AE 等级在 T1 时与儿童相似,在 T2 时明显更高(即更差),用于恶心、呕吐、厌食、疼痛、疲劳、焦虑和抑郁。在 T1(κ 范围为 0.08-0.34)和 T2(0.11-0.35)时,儿童-临床医生分级的一致性为差到适度,在 T1(0.34-0.65)和 T2(0.24-0.60)时,儿童-护理人员分级的一致性为适度到良好。没有因素在所有 AE 中一致与报告者的一致性相关。
与儿童相比,临床医生的症状性 AE 报告率一直较低,一致性较差,而护理人员的报告率一直较高,一致性为中到较差。应常规纳入儿童使用 Ped-PRO-CTCAE 或类似措施的直接报告,以用于临床试验中的毒性评估。