Suppr超能文献

在一项放化疗协作组多中心临床试验中,通过患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)让患者报告症状性不良事件的可行性。

Feasibility of Patient Reporting of Symptomatic Adverse Events via the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in a Chemoradiotherapy Cooperative Group Multicenter Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Basch Ethan, Pugh Stephanie L, Dueck Amylou C, Mitchell Sandra A, Berk Lawrence, Fogh Shannon, Rogak Lauren J, Gatewood Marcha, Reeve Bryce B, Mendoza Tito R, O'Mara Ann M, Denicoff Andrea M, Minasian Lori M, Bennett Antonia V, Setser Ann, Schrag Deborah, Roof Kevin, Moore Joan K, Gergel Thomas, Stephans Kevin, Rimner Andreas, DeNittis Albert, Bruner Deborah Watkins

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of measuring symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in a multicenter clinical trial using the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients enrolled in NRG Oncology's RTOG 1012 (Prophylactic Manuka Honey for Reduction of Chemoradiation Induced Esophagitis-Related Pain during Treatment of Lung Cancer) were asked to self-report 53 PRO-CTCAE items representing 30 symptomatic AEs at 6 time points (baseline; weekly ×4 during treatment; 12 weeks after treatment). Reporting was conducted via wireless tablet computers in clinic waiting areas. Compliance was defined as the proportion of visits when an expected PRO-CTCAE assessment was completed.

RESULTS

Among 226 study sites participating in RTOG 1012, 100% completed 35-minute PRO-CTCAE training for clinical research associates (CRAs); 80 sites enrolled patients, of which 34 (43%) required tablet computers to be provided. All 152 patients in RTOG 1012 agreed to self-report using the PRO-CTCAE (median age 66 years; 47% female; 84% white). Median time for CRAs to learn the system was 60 minutes (range, 30-240 minutes), and median time for CRAs to teach a patient to self-report was 10 minutes (range, 2-60 minutes). Compliance was high, particularly during active treatment, when patients self-reported at 86% of expected time points, although compliance was lower after treatment (72%). Common reasons for noncompliance were institutional errors, such as forgetting to provide computers to participants; patients missing clinic visits; Internet connectivity; and patients feeling "too sick."

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients enrolled in a multicenter chemoradiotherapy trial were willing and able to self-report symptomatic AEs at visits using tablet computers. Minimal effort was required by local site staff to support this system. The observed causes of missing data may be obviated by allowing patients to self-report electronically between visits, and by using central compliance monitoring. These approaches are being incorporated into ongoing studies.

摘要

目的

评估在一项多中心临床试验中使用美国国立癌症研究所患者报告结局版不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)来测量有症状不良事件(AE)的可行性。

方法和材料

入组NRG肿瘤学组织的RTOG 1012(预防性麦卢卡蜂蜜用于减轻肺癌治疗期间放化疗引起的食管炎相关疼痛)试验的患者被要求在6个时间点(基线;治疗期间每周一次,共4次;治疗后12周)自行报告代表30种有症状AE的53项PRO-CTCAE条目。报告通过临床等候区的无线平板电脑进行。依从性定义为完成预期PRO-CTCAE评估的访视比例。

结果

在参与RTOG 1012的226个研究地点中,100%完成了针对临床研究助理(CRA)的35分钟PRO-CTCAE培训;80个地点招募了患者,其中34个(43%)需要提供平板电脑。RTOG 1012的所有152名患者均同意使用PRO-CTCAE自行报告(中位年龄66岁;47%为女性;84%为白人)。CRA学习该系统的中位时间为60分钟(范围30 - 240分钟),CRA指导患者自行报告的中位时间为10分钟(范围2 - 60分钟)。依从性较高,尤其是在积极治疗期间,患者在86%的预期时间点进行了自行报告,不过治疗后依从性较低(72%)。不依从的常见原因包括机构失误,如忘记为参与者提供电脑;患者错过门诊访视;网络连接问题;以及患者感觉“病得太重”。

结论

大多数入组多中心放化疗试验的患者愿意且能够在访视时使用平板电脑自行报告有症状AE。当地研究点工作人员只需付出最少努力就能支持该系统。通过允许患者在访视之间进行电子自行报告以及使用中央依从性监测,可能避免观察到的缺失数据原因。这些方法正在纳入正在进行的研究中。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验