Wang Meng-Ting, Huang Ya-Ling, Lai Jyun-Heng, Lee Chien-Hsing, Wang Pin-Chun, Pan Hsueh-Yi, Lin ChenWei, Liou Jun-Ting, Hsu Yu-Juei
Department of Pharmacy, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Diabetes Care. 2022 May 1;45(5):1276-1287. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1779.
Previous studies have revealed an intraclass difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among sulfonylureas. In vitro and ex vivo studies reported several sulfonylureas to exhibit high-affinity blockage of cardiac mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium (mitoKATP) channels and could interfere with ischemic preconditioning, the most important mechanism of self-cardiac protection. However, no studies have examined whether these varying binding affinities of sulfonylureas could account for their intraclass difference in MACE. We compared mitoKATP channel high-affinity versus low-affinity sulfonylureas regarding the MACE risk in real-world settings.
Using the Taiwan nationwide health care claims database, patients with type 2 diabetes initiating sulfonylurea monotherapy between 2007 and 2016 were included in the cohort study. A total of 33,727 new mitoKATP channel high-affinity (glyburide and glipizide) and low-affinity (gliclazide and glimepiride) sulfonylurea users, respectively, were identified after 1:1 propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CI.
MitoKATP channel high-affinity sulfonylureas were associated with a significantly increased risk of three-point MACE (aHR 1.21 [95% CI 1.03-1.44]), ischemic stroke (aHR 1.23 [95% CI 1.02-1.50]), and cardiovascular death (aHR 2.61 [95% CI 1.31-5.20]), but not with that of myocardial infarction (aHR 1.04 [95% CI 0.75-1.46]). The duration-response analyses revealed the highest MACE risk to be within 90 days of therapy (aHR 4.67 [95% CI 3.61-6.06]).
Cardiac mitoKATP channel high-affinity sulfonylureas were associated with an increased MACE risk compared with low-affinity sulfonylureas in a nationwide population with diabetes.
既往研究揭示了磺脲类药物在主要不良心血管事件(MACE)方面存在类内差异。体外和离体研究报告称,几种磺脲类药物可对心肌线粒体ATP敏感性钾(mitoKATP)通道表现出高亲和力阻断作用,并可能干扰缺血预处理,而缺血预处理是心脏自我保护的最重要机制。然而,尚无研究探讨磺脲类药物这些不同的结合亲和力是否可解释其在MACE方面的类内差异。我们在现实环境中比较了mitoKATP通道高亲和力与低亲和力磺脲类药物的MACE风险。
利用台湾地区全国医疗保健索赔数据库,队列研究纳入了2007年至2016年间开始接受磺脲类单药治疗的2型糖尿病患者。经过1:1倾向评分匹配后,分别确定了33727名新的mitoKATP通道高亲和力(格列本脲和格列吡嗪)和低亲和力(格列齐特和格列美脲)磺脲类药物使用者。采用Cox比例风险模型估计调整后的风险比(aHRs)和95%置信区间(CI)。
mitoKATP通道高亲和力磺脲类药物与三分MACE风险显著增加相关(aHR 1.21 [95%CI 1.03 - 1.44])、缺血性卒中(aHR 1.23 [95%CI 1.02 - 1.50])和心血管死亡(aHR 2.61 [95%CI 1.31 - 5.20]),但与心肌梗死风险无关(aHR 1.04 [95%CI 0.75 - 1.46])。持续时间 - 反应分析显示,治疗90天内MACE风险最高(aHR 4.67 [95%CI 3.61 - 6.06])。
在全国糖尿病患者人群中,与低亲和力磺脲类药物相比,心脏mitoKATP通道高亲和力磺脲类药物与MACE风险增加相关。