• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主观判断对自传体记忆的直接和生成检索:内感受敏感性和情绪的作用。

Subjective judgments on direct and generative retrieval of autobiographical memory: The role of interoceptive sensibility and emotion.

机构信息

Division of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Shinshu University, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.

CON AMORE, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2022 Nov;50(8):1644-1663. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01280-8. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-022-01280-8
PMID:35294741
Abstract

Autobiographical remembering is a subjective experience, and whether retrieval is perceived to occur through involuntary or voluntary, direct or generative cognitive processes is also based on subjective intuition. The present study examined factors that may contribute to the subjective judgment that occurs when we perceive memories as being retrieved directly (i.e., a memory comes to mind directly and immediately) or through generative processes (i.e., recalling a memory with effort or by using additional information). We examined the hypothesis that internal awareness (interoceptive sensibility and mindfulness traits) contributes to the physical reaction and emotional impact of memories at retrieval, which then influence the subjective judgment that memories are retrieved directly. In two online experiments, participants were asked to recall specific memories following verbal cues and to judge the retrieval process (i.e., direct or generative). We demonstrated that emotional awareness, an interoceptive sensibility scale factor, consistently predicted a high probability of direct retrieval judgments independent of other predictors of direct retrieval, such as retrieval latency and cue concreteness. This effect was especially common for concrete cues. In Experiment 2 we demonstrated that emotional awareness predicted direct retrieval judgments through the mediation of retrieval impact (physical reaction and emotional impact). These results indicate the involvement of interoceptive processing in the direct retrieval of autobiographical memories. We discuss the role of interoception in memory retrieval and present interoceptive prediction error as a novel and potentially integrative account of our findings.

摘要

自传体记忆是一种主观体验,而检索是否被认为是通过无意识或有意识、直接或生成性的认知过程发生的,也基于主观直觉。本研究考察了可能导致我们将记忆直接(即记忆直接而立即出现在脑海中)或通过生成过程(即努力回忆记忆或使用额外信息来回忆记忆)被检索的主观判断的因素。我们假设内部意识(内感受敏感性和正念特质)有助于记忆检索时的身体反应和情绪影响,进而影响记忆是直接检索的主观判断。在两项在线实验中,参与者被要求根据口头提示回忆特定的记忆,并判断检索过程(即直接或生成性)。我们证明,情绪意识(内感受敏感性量表的一个因素)独立于其他直接检索的预测因素(如检索潜伏期和提示具体性),一致预测直接检索判断的高概率。对于具体的提示,这种效果尤其常见。在实验 2 中,我们证明情绪意识通过检索影响(身体反应和情绪影响)来预测直接检索判断。这些结果表明内感受加工参与了自传体记忆的直接检索。我们讨论了内感受在记忆检索中的作用,并提出了内感受预测误差作为我们发现的一个新的、潜在的综合解释。

相似文献

1
Subjective judgments on direct and generative retrieval of autobiographical memory: The role of interoceptive sensibility and emotion.主观判断对自传体记忆的直接和生成检索:内感受敏感性和情绪的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Nov;50(8):1644-1663. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01280-8. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
Direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval: How different are they?直接自传体记忆检索和生成自传体记忆检索:它们有何不同?
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Sep;74:102793. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102793. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
3
Different retrieval mechanisms of overgeneral autobiographical memory for positive and negative cues in remitted major depressive disorder.缓解期重度抑郁症患者对积极和消极线索的过度概括性自传体记忆的不同检索机制。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;79:101822. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101822. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
4
Retrieving autobiographical memories: How different retrieval strategies associated with different cues explain reaction time differences.检索自传体记忆:不同的检索策略如何与不同线索相关联,从而解释反应时间的差异。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Feb;164:144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
5
Cue generation and memory construction in direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval.直接和生成性自传体记忆检索中的线索生成与记忆构建。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 May;33:204-16. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
6
Meta-memory (prediction) of specific autobiographical recall: An experimental approach using a modified autobiographical memory test.元记忆(预测)的特定自传体回忆:使用改良自传体记忆测试的实验方法。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1263-1274. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01541-8. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
7
Does retrieval intentionality really matter? Similarities and differences between involuntary memories and directly and generatively retrieved voluntary memories.检索意向真的重要吗?非自主记忆与直接生成性检索的自主记忆之间的异同。
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):519-36. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12160. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
Exploring the role of interoception in autobiographical memory recollection.探索内感受在自传体记忆回忆中的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Jul;102:103358. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103358. Epub 2022 May 28.
9
Dissociations between directly and generatively retrieved autobiographical memories: evidence from ageing.直接检索与生成性检索的自传体记忆之间的分离:来自衰老的证据。
Memory. 2023 Aug;31(7):931-947. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2212921. Epub 2023 May 15.
10
Emotional cue effects on accessing and elaborating upon autobiographical memories.情绪线索对提取和详细描述自传体记忆的影响。
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104217. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104217. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling interoception and its links to cognitive functioning in fibromyalgia.解析纤维肌痛症中的内感受及其与认知功能的联系。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 26;15(1):31403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15087-5.
2
The Subjective Experience of Autobiographical Remembering: Conceptual and Methodological Advances and Challenges.自传性记忆的主观体验:概念与方法的进展及挑战
J Intell. 2024 Feb 12;12(2):21. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020021.
3
If My Memory Serves Me Well: Investigating My Memory for the Past 24 Years.如果我没记错的话:回顾我过去24年的记忆
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 19;7(1):16. doi: 10.5334/joc.334. eCollection 2024.