Department of Psychology, McGill University, Canada.
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Canada.
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104217. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104217. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
If remembering the past requires a cue to stimulate mental reactivation of an experience (i.e., a memory), then the nature of the retrieval cue should bias how that experience is recalled. Based on the established link between emotion and memory, we tested how two emotional properties of a cue - valence (positive and negative) and arousal (high and low) - influence different phases of autobiographical memory retrieval: searching/accessing an autobiographical episode, and then elaborating on the associated memory representation. Young, healthy participants completed two experimental sessions that were separated by 24 to 48 h. In session one, participants used musical retrieval cues that varied in emotional valence and arousal to access autobiographical memories. Cue-evoked physiological arousal and valence responses were measured via skin conductance and facial electromyography, respectively, as were the reaction times to access each memory. In session two, participants reactivated and then described (elaborated) the details of the memories that were accessed in session one. The resultant descriptions were scored for the number of specific episodic (internal) and non-episodic (external) details. While arousal and valence levels of the retrieval cues, as well as the evoked physiological responses, significantly predicted the reaction time to access a memory, only cue arousal predicted how detailed the representations were constructed. Memories that were initially accessed to high-arousing cues were later described with more episodic details than memories accessed to low-arousing cues. These data provide new insights into how emotional valence and arousal levels of retrieval cues distinctly bias the accessibility and detailed elaboration of autobiographical memories.
如果回忆过去需要一个提示来刺激对经历的心理再激活(即记忆),那么检索提示的性质应该会影响对该经历的回忆方式。基于情绪和记忆之间已建立的联系,我们测试了提示的两个情绪属性(积极和消极)和唤醒度(高和低)如何影响自传体记忆检索的不同阶段:搜索/访问自传体事件,然后详细描述相关的记忆表现。年轻、健康的参与者完成了两个实验会话,这两个会话之间间隔 24 到 48 小时。在第一个会话中,参与者使用情绪唤醒度和唤醒度不同的音乐检索提示来访问自传体记忆。通过皮肤电导和面部肌电图分别测量提示引起的生理唤醒度和唤醒度的反应,以及访问每个记忆的反应时间。在第二个会话中,参与者重新激活并描述(详细描述)在第一个会话中访问的记忆的细节。根据描述的具体情节(内部)和非情节(外部)细节数量对描述进行评分。虽然检索提示的唤醒度和唤醒度水平以及引起的生理反应显著预测了访问记忆的反应时间,但只有提示唤醒度预测了记忆表现的详细程度。最初使用高唤醒度提示访问的记忆,在稍后的描述中比使用低唤醒度提示访问的记忆具有更多的情节细节。这些数据为情绪唤醒度和唤醒度水平如何分别影响自传体记忆的可及性和详细程度提供了新的见解。