Suppr超能文献

用于评估毒性数据可靠性和相关性的SciRAP方法的开发。

Development of the SciRAP Approach for Evaluating the Reliability and Relevance of Toxicity Data.

作者信息

Roth Nicolas, Zilliacus Johanna, Beronius Anna

机构信息

Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology (SCAHT), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Toxicol. 2021 Oct 15;3:746430. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2021.746430. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Efficient and successful integration of data generated from non-animal test methods must rely on reliable and relevant data. It is important therefore to develop tools and criteria that facilitate scientifically sound, structured, and transparent evaluation of reliability and relevance of toxicity data to efficiently inform regulatory hazard and risk assessment. The (SciRAP) initiative aims to promote such overarching goals. We present the work to develop and refine the SciRAP tool for evaluation of reliability and relevance of studies for incorporation on the SciRAP web-based platform (www.scirap.org). In the SciRAP approach, reliability evaluation is based on criteria for reporting quality and methodological quality, and is explicitly separated from relevance evaluation. The SciRAP tool (version 1.0) was tested and evaluated during an expert test round (April 2019-September 2020) on three studies by thirty-one experts from regulatory authorities, industry and academia from different geographical areas and with various degree of experience in research and/or human health risk assessment. In addition, the experts answered an online survey to collect their feedback about the general features and desired characteristics of the tool for further refinement. The SciRAP tool (version 2.0) was revised based on the outcome of the expert test round (study evaluation and online survey) and consists of 24 criteria for evaluating "" (reliability), 16 criteria for "" (reliability) and 4 items for evaluating relevance of studies. Participants were generally positive about the adequacy, flexibility, and user-friendliness of the tool. The expert test round outlined the need to (i) revise the formulation of certain criteria; (ii) provide new or revised accompanying guidance for reporting quality and methodological quality criteria in the "," "," and "" domains; and (iii) provide revised guidance for relevance items, as general measures to reduce inter-expert variability. The SciRAP tool allows for a structured and transparent evaluation of studies for use in regulatory hazard and risk assessment of chemicals.

摘要

高效且成功地整合非动物试验方法产生的数据必须依赖可靠且相关的数据。因此,开发有助于对毒性数据的可靠性和相关性进行科学合理、结构化且透明评估的工具和标准非常重要,以便有效地为监管危害和风险评估提供信息。(科学风险评估流程)倡议旨在推动这些总体目标。我们展示了为开发和完善科学风险评估流程工具而开展的工作,该工具用于评估研究的可靠性和相关性,以便纳入科学风险评估流程的基于网络的平台(www.scirap.org)。在科学风险评估流程方法中,可靠性评估基于报告质量和方法质量标准,并且与相关性评估明确分开。科学风险评估流程工具(版本1.0)在一次专家测试阶段(2019年4月至2020年9月)中,由来自不同地理区域、在研究和/或人类健康风险评估方面具有不同经验程度的监管机构、行业和学术界的31位专家对三项研究进行了测试和评估。此外,专家们回答了一项在线调查,以收集他们对该工具的一般特征和期望特性的反馈,以便进一步完善。科学风险评估流程工具(版本2.0)根据专家测试阶段的结果(研究评估和在线调查)进行了修订,包括用于评估“……”(可靠性)的24条标准、用于“……”(可靠性)的16条标准以及用于评估研究相关性的4项内容。参与者总体上对该工具的充分性、灵活性和用户友好性持肯定态度。专家测试阶段明确了需要(i)修订某些标准的表述;(ii)为“……”、“……”和“……”领域的报告质量和方法质量标准提供新的或修订后的配套指南;以及(iii)为相关性项目提供修订后的指南,作为减少专家间变异性的一般措施。科学风险评估流程工具允许对用于化学品监管危害和风险评估的研究进行结构化和透明的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6500/8915875/26fc810c7d84/ftox-03-746430-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验