Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
BMC Microbiol. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02478-1.
Rearing systems can affect livestock production directly, but whether they have effects on intestinal growth states and ceca microorganisms in ducks is largely unclear. The current study used Nonghua ducks to estimate the effects of rearing systems on the intestines by evaluating differences in intestinal growth indices and cecal microorganisms between ducks in the floor-rearing system (FRS) and net-rearing system (NRS).
The values of relative weight (RW), relative length (RL) and RW/RL of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and ceca in the FRS were significantly higher than those in the NRS during weeks 4, 8 and 13 (p < 0.05). A total of 157 genera were identified from ducks under the two systems, and the dominant microorganisms in both treatments were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria at the phylum level. The distribution of microorganisms in the ceca of the two treatments showed significant separation during the three time periods, and the value of the Simpson index in the FRS was significantly higher than that in the NRS at 13 weeks (p < 0.05). Five differential microorganisms and 25 differential metabolic pathways were found in the ceca at week 4, seven differential microorganisms and 25 differential metabolic pathways were found in the ceca at week 8, and four differential microorganisms and two differential metabolic pathways were found in the ceca at week 13.
The rearing system influences duck intestinal development and microorganisms. The FRS group had higher intestinal RL, RW and RW/RL and obviously separated ceca microorganisms compared to those of the NRS group. The differential metabolic pathways of cecal microorganisms decreased with increasing age, and the abundance of translation pathways was higher in the NRS group at week 13, while cofactor and vitamin metabolism were more abundant in the FRS group.
饲养系统可以直接影响畜牧业生产,但它们是否对鸭的肠道生长状态和盲肠微生物有影响在很大程度上尚不清楚。本研究使用农华鸭来评估饲养系统对肠道的影响,方法是评估地板饲养系统(FRS)和网饲养系统(NRS)中鸭的肠道生长指标和盲肠微生物之间的差异。
在第 4、8 和 13 周时,FRS 组鸭的十二指肠、空肠、回肠和盲肠的相对重量(RW)、相对长度(RL)和 RW/RL 值显著高于 NRS 组(p<0.05)。从两个系统的鸭子中鉴定出 157 个属,两个处理中占优势的微生物在门水平上均为Firmicutes、Bacteroidetes、Actinobacteria 和 Proteobacteria。两个处理的盲肠中微生物的分布在三个时期均显示出明显的分离,在 13 周时 FRS 中的 Simpson 指数显著高于 NRS(p<0.05)。在第 4 周时,在盲肠中发现了 5 种差异微生物和 25 种差异代谢途径,在第 8 周时发现了 7 种差异微生物和 25 种差异代谢途径,在第 13 周时发现了 4 种差异微生物和 2 种差异代谢途径。
饲养系统影响鸭的肠道发育和微生物。与 NRS 组相比,FRS 组的肠道 RL、RW 和 RW/RL 更高,盲肠微生物的分离更为明显。盲肠微生物的差异代谢途径随年龄的增加而减少,13 周时 NRS 组的翻译途径丰度较高,而 FRS 组的辅因子和维生素代谢更为丰富。