Suppr超能文献

二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂对心肾结局的影响:23 项心血管结局试验的网络荟萃分析。

The effect of DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors on cardiorenal outcomes: a network meta-analysis of 23 CVOTs.

机构信息

Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, PhD of Translational Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Mar 16;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01474-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors reduce cardiorenal outcomes. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the effect on cardiorenal outcomes among GLP-1 RAs, SGLT-2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.

METHODS

We searched the PUBMED, Embase and Cochrane databases for relevant studies published up until 10 December 2021. Cardiovascular and renal outcome trials reporting outcomes on GLP-1RA, SGLT-2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); other outcomes were cardiovascular and total death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and renal outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty-three trials enrolling a total number of 181,143 participants were included. DPP-4 inhibitors did not lower the risk of any cardiorenal outcome when compared with placebo and were associated with higher risks of MACE, HHF, and renal outcome when compared with the other two drug classes. SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced cardiovascular (RR = 0.88) and total (RR = 0.87) death, as compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, while GLP-1 RA reduced total death only (RR = 0.87). The comparison between GLP-1RA and SGLT-2 inhibitors showed no difference in their risks of MACE, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, CV and total death; SGLT-2 inhibitors were superior to GLP-1RA in reducing the risk of HHF and the renal outcome (24% and 22% lower risk, respectively). Only GLP-1RA reduced the risk of nonfatal stroke (RR = 0.84), as compared with placebo. There was no head-to-head trial directly comparing these antidiabetic drug classes.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RA are superior to DPP-4 inhibitors in reducing the risk of most cardiorenal outcomes; SGLT-2 inhibitors are superior to GLP-1RA in reducing the risk of HHF and renal events; GLP-1RA only reduced the risk of nonfatal stroke. Both SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RA should be the preferred treatment for type 2 diabetes and cardiorenal diseases.

摘要

背景

胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2(SGLT-2)抑制剂可降低心肾结局。我们进行了一项网状荟萃分析,以比较 GLP-1RA、SGLT-2 抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂在治疗伴有或不伴有 2 型糖尿病的患者的心肾结局方面的效果。

方法

我们检索了 PUBMED、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,以获取截至 2021 年 12 月 10 日发表的相关研究。纳入了报告 GLP-1RA、SGLT-2 抑制剂和 DPP-4 抑制剂在伴有或不伴有 2 型糖尿病的患者中对心血管和肾脏结局影响的心血管和肾脏结局试验。主要结局为主要不良心血管事件(MACE);其他结局为心血管和全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、非致死性卒中和心力衰竭住院(HHF)以及肾脏结局。

结果

纳入了 23 项试验,共计 181143 名参与者。与安慰剂相比,DPP-4 抑制剂并未降低任何心肾结局的风险,与其他两类药物相比,DPP-4 抑制剂与 MACE、HHF 和肾脏结局风险升高相关。与 DPP-4 抑制剂相比,SGLT-2 抑制剂显著降低了心血管(RR=0.88)和全因(RR=0.87)死亡风险,而 GLP-1RA 仅降低了全因死亡风险(RR=0.87)。GLP-1RA 与 SGLT-2 抑制剂之间的比较显示,它们在 MACE、非致死性 MI、非致死性卒中和心血管及全因死亡风险方面没有差异;SGLT-2 抑制剂在降低 HHF 和肾脏结局风险方面优于 GLP-1RA(风险分别降低 24%和 22%)。只有 GLP-1RA 降低了非致死性卒中的风险(RR=0.84),与安慰剂相比。这些抗糖尿病药物类别之间没有直接比较的头对头试验。

结论

SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1RA 降低大多数心肾结局风险优于 DPP-4 抑制剂;SGLT-2 抑制剂降低 HHF 和肾脏事件风险优于 GLP-1RA;GLP-1RA 仅降低非致死性卒中的风险。SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1RA 均应作为 2 型糖尿病和心肾疾病的首选治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c9/8925229/d7063abfe33b/12933_2022_1474_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验