Suppr超能文献

新型降糖药物对心血管结局的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的网状Meta分析

The efficacy and safety of novel classes of glucose-lowering drugs for cardiovascular outcomes: a network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

作者信息

Lin Donna Shu-Han, Lee Jen-Kuang, Hung Chi-Sheng, Chen Wen-Jone

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2021 Dec;64(12):2676-2686. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05529-w. Epub 2021 Sep 18.

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Several cardiovascular outcome trials on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been released recently, including trials enrolling patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Comparisons of the efficacy and safety of SGLT2i, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) thus require an update. Assessments in patient subgroups, i.e., as stratified by age or the presence of CHF, CKD or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), are also currently lacking.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for relevant studies published up until 5 December 2020. RCTs comparing SGLT2i, GLP-1RA and DPP-4i with placebo (or other controls) or with each other with cardiovascular (CV) or renal outcomes were eligible for inclusion. The primary efficacy endpoint was 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE), which are defined as CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal ischaemic stroke. All-cause mortality, hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) and composite renal outcomes were also analysed. Pre-specified subgroup analyses of 3P-MACE were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 21 trials with 170,930 participants were included in this network meta-analysis. Both GLP-1RA and SGLT2i were associated with lower risks of 3P-MACE than placebo (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84, 0.94 and RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83, 0.94, respectively). GLP-1RA and SGLT2i were also associated with lower risks of 3P-MACE than DPP-4i (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82, 0.98 and RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81, 0.97, respectively). A comparison between SGLT2i and GLP-1RA demonstrated no difference in their risks of 3P-MACE (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91, 1.08). Only GLP-1RA was associated with a lower risk of stroke compared with placebo (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94). SGLT2i is superior to GLP-1RA in reducing HHF (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68, 0.84) and renal outcomes (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65, 0.93). Subgroup analyses indicated that the benefits of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA were more pronounced in elderly patients, white and Asian patients, those with established ASCVD and those with longer durations of diabetes mellitus and worse glycaemic control.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: SGLT2i and GLP-1RA are superior to DPP-4i in terms of CV and renal outcomes. GLP-1RA is the only drug class that reduces the risk of stroke. SGLT2i is superior in reducing HHF and renal outcomes. Therefore, the choice between SGLT2i and GLP-1RA should be individualised according to patient profiles.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020206600.

摘要

目的/假设:近期已公布多项关于钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的心血管结局试验,包括纳入充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的试验。因此,需要更新对SGLT2i、胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)疗效和安全性的比较。目前也缺乏对患者亚组的评估,即按年龄或是否存在CHF、CKD或动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)进行分层评估。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,以查找截至2020年12月5日发表的相关研究。比较SGLT2i、GLP-1RA和DPP-4i与安慰剂(或其他对照)或相互之间的随机对照试验(RCT),若涉及心血管(CV)或肾脏结局,则符合纳入标准。主要疗效终点为3点主要不良心血管事件(3P-MACE),定义为CV死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和非致死性缺血性卒中。还分析了全因死亡率、心力衰竭住院(HHF)和复合肾脏结局。也进行了3P-MACE的预先指定亚组分析。

结果

该网状Meta分析共纳入21项试验,170,930名参与者。与安慰剂相比,GLP-1RA和SGLT2i均与较低的3P-MACE风险相关(RR分别为0.89,95%CI 0.84,0.94和RR 0.88,95%CI 0.83,0.94)。与DPP-4i相比,GLP-1RA和SGLT2i也与较低的3P-MACE风险相关(RR分别为0.89,95%CI 0.82,0.98和RR 0.89,95%CI 0.81,0.97)。SGLT2i与GLP-1RA之间的比较显示,它们的3P-MACE风险无差异(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.91,1.08)。与安慰剂相比,仅GLP-1RA与较低的卒中风险相关(RR 0.85,95%CI 0.76,0.94)。在降低HHF(RR 0.76,95%CI 0.68,0.84)和肾脏结局(RR 0.78,95%CI 0.65,0.93)方面,SGLT2i优于GLP-1RA。亚组分析表明,SGLT2i和GLP-1RA的益处在老年患者、白人和亚洲患者以及已确诊ASCVD的患者、糖尿病病程较长且血糖控制较差的患者中更为明显。

结论/解读:在CV和肾脏结局方面,SGLT2i和GLP-1RA优于DPP-4i。GLP-1RA是唯一能降低卒中风险的药物类别。SGLT2i在降低HHF和肾脏结局方面更具优势。因此,应根据患者情况个体化选择SGLT2i和GLP-1RA。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020206600。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验