• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查患者版指南在肿瘤学中的作用和适用性,并为德国患者版指南的制定、传播和实施提出建议:多阶段研究方案。

Investigating the role and applicability of patient versions of guidelines in oncology and deriving recommendations for the development, dissemination and implementation of patient versions in Germany: protocol for multiphase study.

机构信息

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten / Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten / Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e059040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059040.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059040
PMID:35296489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8928290/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO) has published patient versions of clinical practice guidelines for more than 10 years. However, a systematic evaluation of these is lacking. The project aims to investigate the role and applicability of patient versions by considering the perspectives of experts, patients and healthcare providers to derive recommendations for the development, dissemination and implementation of patient versions in Germany.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The project comprises two main modules. In module 1, we will first obtain information on methods and approaches for the development, dissemination and implementation of patient versions by conducting systematic searches in Medline and screening the websites of guideline organisations. We will include any articles, such as methodological or empirical reports, published in German or English since 2000, that address methodological aspects related to patient versions. Further, we will conduct 20 interviews with experts from international and German organisations who are involved in the development of patient versions. In module 2, we will first conduct interviews to explore patients and healthcare providers' perceptions of patient versions of the GGPO. For the group of patients and the group of healthcare providers, we aim to conduct 25 interviews each. Second, we will conduct focus groups, separately for breast, prostate and colon cancer. The recruitment of participants for the interviews and focus groups will primarily be done through a previous survey about patient versions in oncology. The results will be used to derive recommendations for enhancing the development, dissemination and implementation of patient versions by involving the relevant stakeholder groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for the qualitative parts of the project was given by the Ethics Committee of Witten/Herdecke University (number 160/2021). Participants will be required to provide informed consent. The project findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

摘要

简介

德国肿瘤临床实践指南计划(GGPO)已经出版了超过 10 年的患者版临床实践指南。然而,这些指南的系统评估仍然缺乏。该项目旨在通过考虑专家、患者和医疗保健提供者的观点,研究患者版的作用和适用性,为德国患者版的开发、传播和实施提供建议。

方法和分析

该项目包括两个主要模块。在模块 1 中,我们将首先通过在 Medline 中进行系统搜索并筛选指南组织的网站,获取有关患者版的开发、传播和实施的方法和方法的信息。我们将包括自 2000 年以来以英文或德文发表的任何与患者版相关的方法学或经验报告,如方法学或经验报告。此外,我们将对来自国际和德国组织的 20 名参与患者版开发的专家进行访谈。在模块 2 中,我们将首先进行访谈,以探讨患者和医疗保健提供者对 GGPO 患者版的看法。对于患者组和医疗保健提供者组,我们的目标是每组进行 25 次访谈。其次,我们将分别为乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结肠癌患者举办焦点小组。访谈和焦点小组参与者的招募主要通过之前关于肿瘤学患者版的调查进行。结果将用于通过涉及相关利益相关者群体来增强患者版的开发、传播和实施。

伦理和传播

该项目的定性部分的伦理批准由 Witten/Herdecke 大学伦理委员会(编号 160/2021)授予。参与者将被要求提供知情同意。项目研究结果将发表在同行评议期刊上,并在科学会议上展示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a02e/8928290/a6ef37c38fa3/bmjopen-2021-059040f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a02e/8928290/a6ef37c38fa3/bmjopen-2021-059040f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a02e/8928290/a6ef37c38fa3/bmjopen-2021-059040f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating the role and applicability of patient versions of guidelines in oncology and deriving recommendations for the development, dissemination and implementation of patient versions in Germany: protocol for multiphase study.调查患者版指南在肿瘤学中的作用和适用性,并为德国患者版指南的制定、传播和实施提出建议:多阶段研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e059040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059040.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Awareness, use and perception of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines - a national cross-sectional survey among patients with a cancer diagnosis and healthcare providers.患者版临床实践指南的知晓、使用和认知情况——一项针对癌症患者和医疗保健提供者的全国性横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):1211. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11563-2.
4
[Development of guideline-based quality indicators: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors from the perspective of S3-guideline authors].[基于指南的质量指标的制定:从S3指南作者角度对障碍和促进因素的定性研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
Development and psychometric validation of a patient safety assessment tool in German Radiation Oncology: the PaSaGeRO Study protocol.德国放射肿瘤学患者安全评估工具的开发和心理测量验证:PaSaGeRO 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e086214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086214.
6
Guideline-based quality indicators-a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines: protocol for a systematic review.基于指南的质量指标——德国与国际临床实践指南的系统比较:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 12;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0669-2.
7
Use, applicability, and dissemination of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines in oncology in Germany: a qualitative interview study with healthcare providers.在德国,使用、适用性和传播肿瘤学临床实践指南的患者版本:对医疗保健提供者的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10626-8.
8
[The German guideline clearing-project on bronchial asthma-part 1: Methodology and results of formal appraisal].[德国支气管哮喘指南清理项目——第1部分:形式评估的方法与结果]
Pneumologie. 2003 Aug;57(8):459-67. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41546.
9
Recommendations to improve use and dissemination of patient versions of oncological clinical practice guidelines in Germany: results of a multi-stakeholder workshop.改善德国肿瘤临床实践指南患者版使用和传播的建议:多利益攸关方研讨会的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):2393. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19893-w.
10
[Measuring quality in the German Guideline Programme in Oncology (GGPO)—methodology and implementation].[德国肿瘤学指南计划(GGPO)中的质量评估——方法与实施]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(8-9):470-80. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review.制定指南建议通俗易懂版本的流程:一项范围综述
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Sep;31(6):e70256. doi: 10.1111/jep.70256.
2
Awareness, use and perception of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines - a national cross-sectional survey among patients with a cancer diagnosis and healthcare providers.患者版临床实践指南的知晓、使用和认知情况——一项针对癌症患者和医疗保健提供者的全国性横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):1211. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11563-2.
3
Recommendations to improve use and dissemination of patient versions of oncological clinical practice guidelines in Germany: results of a multi-stakeholder workshop.

本文引用的文献

1
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
2
Implementation of virtual focus groups for qualitative data collection in a global pandemic.在全球大流行期间实施虚拟焦点小组进行定性数据收集
Am J Surg. 2021 May;221(5):918-922. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
Developing quality criteria for patient-directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study.
改善德国肿瘤临床实践指南患者版使用和传播的建议:多利益攸关方研讨会的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):2393. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19893-w.
4
Use, applicability, and dissemination of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines in oncology in Germany: a qualitative interview study with healthcare providers.在德国,使用、适用性和传播肿瘤学临床实践指南的患者版本:对医疗保健提供者的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10626-8.
5
Barriers and facilitators in developing patient versions of clinical practice guidelines - qualitative interviews on experiences of international guideline producers.制定患者版临床实践指南的障碍和促进因素——国际指南制定者经验的定性访谈
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 16;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10524-5.
6
Determinants of Awareness of Clinical Practice Guidelines among Healthcare Users in Japan.日本医疗保健使用者对临床实践指南的认知度的决定因素。
J Patient Exp. 2023 Jan 23;10:23743735231152205. doi: 10.1177/23743735231152205. eCollection 2023.
制定与临床实践指南相关的以患者为导向的知识工具的质量标准。一项开发和共识研究。
Health Expect. 2019 Apr;22(2):201-208. doi: 10.1111/hex.12843. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
4
Feasibility of Synchronous Online Focus Groups of Rural Breast Cancer Survivors on Web-Based Distress Self-Management.基于网络的痛苦自我管理的农村乳腺癌幸存者同步在线焦点小组的可行性
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018 Nov 1;45(6):E111-E124. doi: 10.1188/18.ONF.E111-E124.
5
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Understanding the role of health information in patients' experiences: secondary analysis of qualitative narrative interviews with people diagnosed with cancer in Germany.理解健康信息在患者经历中的作用:对德国癌症确诊患者定性叙事访谈的二次分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 12;8(3):e019576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019576.
7
Unmet information needs and limited health literacy in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients over the course of cancer treatment.新诊断乳腺癌患者在癌症治疗过程中未满足的信息需求及有限的健康素养。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Sep;99(9):1511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.028. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
8
What do patients and the public know about clinical practice guidelines and what do they want from them? A qualitative study.患者及公众对临床实践指南了解多少,他们又期望从指南中获得什么?一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb 24;16:74. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1319-4.
9
Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Content Analysis of Patient Versions.临床实践指南的传播:患者版本的内容分析
Med Decis Making. 2016 Aug;36(6):692-702. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16644427. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
10
[Patient guidelines in oncology: objectives, procedures and first experiences with this format].[肿瘤学患者指南:目标、流程及这种形式的首次经验]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(6):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Sep 28.