Tsuji Taishi, Takagi Daisuke, Kondo Naoki, Maruyama Yoshiko, Ide Kazushige, Wang Hequn, Kondo Katsunori
Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2022 May 24;69(5):383-393. doi: 10.11236/jph.21-120. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
Objectives This study aimed to investigate whether health inequalities among communities would be reduced by intensively enhancing the "Kayoinoba" program in model communities where many high-risk, older adults live.Methods Kobe City and the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study created a mail survey for older adults in 78 communities (community ≈ junior high school district) to conduct community diagnosis. Sixteen communities showed poor values along multiple dimensions of risk and required priority measures. From 2014 to 2019, we designated these 16 communities as model communities. Then, municipal officials and researchers cooperated to support the establishment and management of "Kayoinoba." By using four-waves of mail survey data (in 2011, 2013, 2016, and 2019 with n=8,872, 10,572, 10,063, and 5,759, respectively), secular transitions of nine intermediate outcome indicators (three=social participation, two=social network, and four=social support) and five health outcome indicators (physical function, malnutrition, oral function, cognitive function, and depressive symptoms) were compared between model (n=16) and non-model (n=62) communities via multilevel mixed-effects linear regression analysis.Results In the 2011 and 2013 surveys, model communities showed poor value compared to the non-model communities in 13 of the 14 indicators. A significant interaction between the year and model/non-model communities was confirmed for four intermediate outcome indicators (sports and hobby group participation, number of friends met, and providing emotional support) and three health outcome indicators (oral function, cognitive function, and depressive symptoms). The differences were reduced or eliminated in the 2016 and 2019 surveys. For example, hobby group participation in 2011 was 29.7% vs. 35.0% in model vs. non-model communities; the difference narrowed to 35.2% vs. 36.1% (P=0.008). Similarly, providing emotional support increased from 83.9% vs. 87.0% to 93.3% vs. 93.3% (P=0.007). Depressive symptoms decreased from 31.4% vs. 27.2% to 18.6% vs. 20.3% (P<0.001).Conclusions Promoting community gathering places "Kayoinoba" for six years in communities where many high-risk older adults live may foster social participation, networking, and support and may help reduce health inequalities among communities.
目的 本研究旨在调查,在许多高危老年人居住的示范社区中,通过大力加强“邻里之叶”计划,社区间的健康不平等现象是否会减少。
方法 神户市和日本老年学评估研究为78个社区(社区≈初中校区)的老年人创建了一项邮件调查,以进行社区诊断。16个社区在多个风险维度上表现不佳,需要优先采取措施。从2014年到2019年,我们将这16个社区指定为示范社区。然后,市政官员和研究人员合作支持“邻里之叶”的建立和管理。通过使用四轮邮件调查数据(2011年、2013年、2016年和2019年,分别有n = 8872、10572、10063和5759人),通过多层次混合效应线性回归分析,比较了示范社区(n = 16)和非示范社区(n = 62)中九个中间结果指标(三个=社会参与,两个=社会网络,四个=社会支持)和五个健康结果指标(身体功能、营养不良、口腔功能、认知功能和抑郁症状)的长期变化。
结果 在2011年和2013年的调查中,在14个指标中的13个指标上,示范社区与非示范社区相比表现不佳。对于四个中间结果指标(体育和爱好小组参与、见面的朋友数量以及提供情感支持)和三个健康结果指标(口腔功能、认知功能和抑郁症状),确认了年份与示范/非示范社区之间存在显著交互作用。在2016年和2019年的调查中,差异有所减少或消除。例如,2011年示范社区的爱好小组参与率为29.7%,非示范社区为35.0%;差异缩小到35.2%对36.1%(P = 0.008)。同样,提供情感支持的比例从83.9%对87.0%增加到93.3%对93.3%(P = 0.007)。抑郁症状从31.4%对27.2%下降到18.6%对20.3%(P < 0.001)。
结论 在许多高危老年人居住的社区中推广社区聚集场所“邻里之叶”六年,可能会促进社会参与、社交网络和支持,并可能有助于减少社区间的健康不平等。