• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的 P2Y12 抑制剂依从性轨迹:预后意义。

P2Y12 inhibitor adherence trajectories in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prognostic implications.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2022 Jun 21;43(24):2303-2313. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac116.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac116
PMID:35296876
Abstract

AIMS

Post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) P2Y12 inhibitor non-adherence is common and associated with greater risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Non-adherence can follow different trajectories from an inability to initiate, implement, or continue therapy for the intended duration. We aimed to evaluate P2Y12 inhibitor adherence trajectories among ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), their frequency, and association with MACE.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a cohort study of adults discharged alive after PCI for ACS (2012-16) using the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry linked with administrative data. The primary outcome was P2Y12 inhibitor adherence trajectory in the year after PCI assessed using group-based trajectory modelling. We used logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards regression to assess associations of trajectories with risk factors and MACE, respectively. We included 12 844 patients (mean age 62.4 years, 23.6% female). Five trajectories were identified: early consistent non-adherence (11.0%), rapid decline (7.7%), delayed initiation (6.0%), gradual decline (20.5%), and persistent adherence (54.8%). Compared with persistent adherence, rapid decline [hazard ratio (HR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.49] and delayed initiation (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.12-1.78) were associated with higher MACE in the overall cohort, whereas early consistent non-adherence was associated with higher MACE only in the subgroup receiving a drug-eluting stent (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.60-3.71).

CONCLUSION

After PCI for ACS, patients followed one of five distinct P2Y12 inhibitor adherence trajectories. Rapid decline and delayed initiation were associated with a higher risk of MACE, whereas early consistent non-adherence was only associated with higher MACE risk in patients with a drug-eluting stent.

摘要

目的

急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后 P2Y12 抑制剂依从性差较为常见,且与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险增加相关。依从性差可能会表现为无法开始、实施或持续治疗,也可能表现为无法按照预期持续治疗。我们旨在评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗的 ACS 患者的 P2Y12 抑制剂依从性轨迹及其频率,并分析其与 MACE 的相关性。

方法和结果

我们对 2012 年至 2016 年期间使用 Alberta 省级冠心病预后评估项目(APOPCARE)注册中心与行政数据相链接的 PCI 治疗后存活出院的 ACS 成年患者进行了一项队列研究。主要结局是使用基于群组的轨迹建模方法评估 PCI 后 1 年内 P2Y12 抑制剂的依从性轨迹。我们使用逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险回归分别评估轨迹与危险因素和 MACE 的相关性。我们纳入了 12844 例患者(平均年龄 62.4 岁,23.6%为女性)。共确定了 5 种轨迹:早期持续不依从(11.0%)、快速下降(7.7%)、延迟开始(6.0%)、逐渐下降(20.5%)和持续依从(54.8%)。与持续依从相比,在整个队列中,快速下降(HR 1.23,95%CI 1.01-1.49)和延迟开始(HR 1.41,95%CI 1.12-1.78)与 MACE 风险更高相关,而早期持续不依从仅在接受药物洗脱支架的亚组中与更高的 MACE 风险相关(HR 2.44,95%CI 1.60-3.71)。

结论

在 ACS 行 PCI 治疗后,患者依从性表现为 5 种不同的 P2Y12 抑制剂依从性轨迹中的一种。快速下降和延迟开始与 MACE 风险增加相关,而早期持续不依从仅与接受药物洗脱支架的患者的更高 MACE 风险相关。

相似文献

1
P2Y12 inhibitor adherence trajectories in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prognostic implications.急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的 P2Y12 抑制剂依从性轨迹:预后意义。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Jun 21;43(24):2303-2313. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac116.
2
Association of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel With Major Adverse Coronary Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要不良冠状动脉事件的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 1;180(3):420-428. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6447.
3
Trajectories of P2Y12 inhibitor adherence in patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠脉综合征患者 P2Y12 抑制剂依从性的轨迹。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;33(1):e5704. doi: 10.1002/pds.5704. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
4
Trends in Platelet Adenosine Diphosphate P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Use and Adherence Among Antiplatelet-Naive Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2016.2008-2016 年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板药物初治患者中血小板二磷酸腺苷 P2Y12 受体抑制剂的使用和依从性趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):943-950. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0783.
5
Short- and Midterm Adherence to Platelet P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitors After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(支架)术后短期和中期血小板 P2Y12 受体抑制剂的依从性。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;25(5):466-471. doi: 10.1177/1074248420926667. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
One-year efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Results from a prospective and multicentre ACHILLES registry.普拉格雷和替格瑞洛用于急性冠脉综合征患者的一年疗效与安全性:一项前瞻性多中心ACHILLES注册研究结果
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;86(6):1052-1061. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14213. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
The Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin Discontinuation on a Background of a P2Y Inhibitor in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿司匹林停药联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者 P2Y 抑制剂的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):538-545. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046251. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
8
The contribution of genotype-guided selection of P2Y inhibitor on prognosis in ACS /CCS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study.基因指导的 P2Y 抑制剂选择对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ACS/CCS 患者预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Sep;79(9):1249-1259. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03519-y. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
9
Comparison of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Australian Population.澳大利亚人群中急性冠脉综合征的 P2Y12 抑制剂比较。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1085-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 May 17.
10
Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection vs Conventional Clopidogrel Therapy on Ischemic Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TAILOR-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial.基因指导的口服 P2Y12 抑制剂选择与常规氯吡格雷治疗对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后缺血结局的影响:TAILOR-PCI 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):761-771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12443.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor based on the ABCD-GENE score in acute coronary syndrome patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.基于ABCD-GENE评分比较氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的有效性。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 11;16:1606327. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1606327. eCollection 2025.
2
Medication adherence trajectories and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心血管疾病患者的药物依从性轨迹与临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Glob Health. 2025 May 9;15:04145. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04145.
3
Mediating Effect of Perceived Health Competence on the Association Between Mindfulness and Adherence to Health Behaviors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study.
感知健康能力在急性冠脉综合征患者正念与健康行为依从性关联中的中介作用:一项横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Nov 5;18:2203-2215. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S487100. eCollection 2024.
4
Treatment Modifications in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Ticagrelor: Insights from the FORCE-ACS Registry.替格瑞洛治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的治疗调整:来自FORCE-ACS注册研究的见解
Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jun;125(6):597-606. doi: 10.1055/a-2421-8866. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
What US Cardiology Can Learn From the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes.美国心脏病学可从《2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南》中学到什么。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Aug;47(8):e24329. doi: 10.1002/clc.24329.
6
Reversal of Platelet Inhibition in Patients Receiving Ticagrelor.接受替格瑞洛治疗的患者血小板抑制作用的逆转
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 5;23(9):300. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2309300. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy and 3-year clinical outcome following acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后遵循指南指导的药物治疗及3年临床结局
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Mar 17;3(2):oead029. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead029. eCollection 2023 Mar.