Community Health, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Medical Affairs, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(6):1359-1366. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06396-8. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
Hospitals are increasingly screening patients for social risk factors to help improve patient and population health. Intelligence gained from such screening can be used to inform social need interventions, the development of hospital-community collaborations, and community investment decisions.
We evaluated the frequency of admitted patients' social risk factors and examined whether these factors differed between hospitals within a health system. A central goal was to determine if community-level social need interventions can be similar across hospitals.
We described the development, implementation, and results from Northwell Health's social risk factor screening module. The statistical sample included patients admitted to 12 New York City/Long Island hospitals (except for maternity/pediatrics) who were clinically screened for social risk factors at admission from June 25, 2019, to January 24, 2020.
We calculated frequencies of patients' social needs across all hospitals and for each hospital. We used chi-square and Friedman tests to evaluate whether the hospital-level frequency and rank order of social risk factors differed across hospitals.
Patients who screened positive for any social need (n = 5196; 6.6% of unique patients) had, on average, 2.3 of 13 evaluated social risk factors. Among these patients, the most documented social risk factor was challenges paying bills (29.4%). The frequency of 12 of the 13 social risk factors statistically differed across hospitals. Furthermore, a statistically significant variance in rank orders between the hospitals was identified (Friedman test statistic 30.8 > 19.6: χ2 critical, p = 0.05). However, the hospitals' social need rank orders within their respective New York City/Long Island regions were similar in two of the three regions.
Hospital patients' social needs differed between hospitals within a metropolitan area. Patients at different hospitals have different needs. Local considerations are essential in formulating social need interventions and in developing hospital-community partnerships to address these needs.
医院越来越多地对患者进行社会风险因素筛查,以帮助改善患者和人群的健康状况。从这种筛查中获得的信息可以用于告知社会需求干预措施、制定医院-社区合作以及社区投资决策。
我们评估了住院患者的社会风险因素的频率,并检查了这些因素在一个卫生系统内的医院之间是否存在差异。一个核心目标是确定社区层面的社会需求干预措施是否可以在不同医院之间相似。
我们描述了诺斯韦尔健康公司社会风险因素筛查模块的开发、实施和结果。统计样本包括 2019 年 6 月 25 日至 2020 年 1 月 24 日期间在纽约市/长岛的 12 家医院(妇产科/儿科除外)住院的患者,他们在入院时接受了社会风险因素的临床筛查。
我们计算了所有医院和每个医院的患者社会需求的频率。我们使用卡方检验和 Friedman 检验来评估医院层面的社会风险因素的频率和等级顺序是否存在差异。
筛查出任何社会需求阳性的患者(n=5196;独特患者的 6.6%)平均有 13 项评估的社会风险因素中的 2.3 项。在这些患者中,记录最多的社会风险因素是支付账单的困难(29.4%)。13 项社会风险因素中的 12 项在医院之间的频率存在统计学差异。此外,还确定了医院之间等级顺序存在统计学显著差异(Friedman 检验统计量 30.8>19.6:χ2 临界值,p=0.05)。然而,在三个区域中的两个区域中,医院的社会需求等级顺序在其各自的纽约市/长岛区域内是相似的。
大都市地区内医院患者的社会需求存在差异。不同医院的患者有不同的需求。在制定社会需求干预措施和制定医院-社区伙伴关系以满足这些需求时,需要考虑当地情况。