IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
PeerJ. 2023 Apr 21;11:e15263. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15263. eCollection 2023.
Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted. The aim of this scoping review was to determine social needs categories are included in published Social Needs Screening Tools that have been developed for use in primary care settings, and these social needs are screened.
We pre-registered the study on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/dqan2/). We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 01/01/2010 to 3/05/2022 to identify eligible studies reporting tools designed for use in primary healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies, a single reviewer extracted data. We summarised the characteristics of included studies descriptively and calculated the number of studies that collected data relevant to specific social needs categories. We identified sub-categories to classify the types of questions relevant to each of the main categories.
We identified 420 unique citations, and 27 were included. Nine additional studies were retrieved by searching for tools that were used or referred to in excluded studies. Questions relating to food insecurity and the physical environment in which a person lives were the most frequently included items (92-94% of tools), followed by questions relating to economic stability and aspects of social and community context (81%). Seventy-five percent of the screening tools included items that evaluated five or more social needs categories (mean 6.5; standard deviation 1.75). One study reported that the tool had been 'validated'; 16 reported 'partial' validation; 12 reported that the tool was 'not validated' and seven studies did not report validation processes or outcomes.
不良的健康社会决定因素导致个体层面的社会需求,这些需求有可能对健康产生负面影响。对患者进行筛查以确定未满足的社会需求的做法越来越普遍。有必要对当前可用的筛查工具的内容进行审查。本范围综述的目的是确定已发表的用于初级保健环境的社会需求筛查工具中包含哪些社会需求类别,以及这些社会需求是否被筛查。
我们在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/dqan2/)上预先注册了该研究。我们从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 5 日在 MEDLINE 和 Embase 上进行了检索,以确定报告专门为初级保健环境设计的工具的合格研究。两名审查员独立筛选研究,一名审查员提取数据。我们对纳入研究的特征进行描述性总结,并计算了收集与特定社会需求类别相关数据的研究数量。我们确定了子类别,以对与每个主要类别相关的问题类型进行分类。
我们确定了 420 个独特的引文,其中 27 个被纳入。通过搜索在排除的研究中使用或提及的工具,还检索到了另外 9 项研究。与食品不安全和一个人生活的物理环境相关的问题是最常包含的项目(92-94%的工具),其次是与经济稳定性以及社会和社区背景的各个方面相关的问题(81%)。75%的筛查工具包含评估五个或更多社会需求类别的项目(平均值 6.5;标准差 1.75)。一项研究报告称该工具已“验证”;16 项报告“部分”验证;12 项报告该工具未“验证”,7 项研究未报告验证过程或结果。