• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating Quality Indicators of Glioblastoma Care: Audit Results From an Indian Tertiary Care Cancer Center.评估胶质母细胞瘤治疗的质量指标:来自印度一家三级癌症护理中心的审计结果。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Mar;8:e2100405. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00405.
2
Long-term therapy with temozolomide is a feasible option for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a single-institution experience with as many as 101 temozolomide cycles.替莫唑胺长期治疗是新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的一种可行选择:一家机构多达101个替莫唑胺疗程的经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Dec;37(6):E4. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.FOCUS14502.
3
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Temozolomide Followed by Adjuvant Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Observation Study in Korea.替莫唑胺同步放化疗后序贯辅助替莫唑胺治疗新诊断胶质母细胞瘤患者:韩国一项回顾性多中心观察研究
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;49(1):193-203. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.473. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
4
The value of temozolomide in combination with radiotherapy during standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.替莫唑胺联合放化疗在新诊断胶质母细胞瘤标准治疗中的价值。
J Neurooncol. 2013 Apr;112(2):277-83. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1060-3. Epub 2013 Feb 2.
5
Postoperative neoadjuvant temozolomide before radiotherapy versus standard radiotherapy in patients 60 years or younger with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma: a randomized trial.60岁及以下间变性星形细胞瘤或胶质母细胞瘤患者术后放疗前新辅助替莫唑胺与标准放疗的随机试验
Acta Oncol. 2017 Dec;56(12):1776-1785. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1332780. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
6
Limited role for extended maintenance temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.延长替莫唑胺维持治疗在新诊断胶质母细胞瘤中的作用有限。
Neurology. 2017 Apr 11;88(15):1422-1430. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003809. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
7
Phase I study of hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者接受分割强度调制放射治疗联合同步和辅助替莫唑胺的 I 期研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Feb 20;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-38.
8
Hypofractionated radiotherapy with or without concurrent temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a review of ten-year single institutional experience.多形性胶质母细胞瘤老年患者低分割放疗联合或不联合替莫唑胺同期治疗:十年单机构经验回顾。
J Neurooncol. 2012 Apr;107(2):395-405. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0766-3. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
9
Radiochemotherapy with temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma. Prognostic factors and long-term outcome of unselected patients from a single institution.替莫唑胺放化疗治疗胶质母细胞瘤。来自单机构的未经选择的患者的预后因素和长期结果。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2011 Nov;187(11):722-8. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-2230-x. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
10
Accelerated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a safety and efficacy analysis.多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者同步和辅助替莫唑胺的加速超分割调强放疗:安全性和疗效分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.030. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2014-2018.美国 2014-2018 年诊断的原发性脑和其他中枢神经系统肿瘤 CBTRUS 统计报告。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Oct 5;23(12 Suppl 2):iii1-iii105. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab200.
2
Research Goal-Driven Data Model and Harmonization for De-Identifying Patient Data in Radiomics.研究目标驱动的数据模型与放射组学中去识别患者数据的协调
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Aug;34(4):986-1004. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00476-9. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.2021 年世卫组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类:概述。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106.
4
A vaccine targeting mutant IDH1 in newly diagnosed glioma.针对新诊断的神经胶质瘤中突变 IDH1 的疫苗。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7854):463-468. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03363-z. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Evaluation of Reliability and Correlations of Quality Measures in Cancer Care.癌症护理质量衡量标准的可靠性评估及其相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212474. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2474.
6
Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India.印度在获得癌症临床试验机会方面的地理差异。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Jan 5;15:1161. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1161. eCollection 2021.
7
Prioritizing Delivery of Cancer Treatment During a COVID-19 Lockdown: The Experience of a Clinical Oncology Service in India.在 COVID-19 封锁期间优先提供癌症治疗:印度临床肿瘤学服务的经验。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 Jan;7:99-107. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00433.
8
Beyond the World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors 2016: what are the new developments for gliomas from a clinician's perspective?超越 2016 年世界卫生组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类:从临床医生的角度看,胶质瘤有哪些新进展?
Curr Opin Neurol. 2020 Dec;33(6):701-706. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000871.
9
CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2013-2017.美国 2013-2017 年诊断的原发性脑和其他中枢神经系统肿瘤 CBTRUS 统计报告。
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Oct 30;22(12 Suppl 2):iv1-iv96. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa200.
10
Cancer Statistics, 2020: Report From National Cancer Registry Programme, India.《2020年癌症统计数据:来自印度国家癌症登记计划的报告》
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jul;6:1063-1075. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00122.

评估胶质母细胞瘤治疗的质量指标:来自印度一家三级癌症护理中心的审计结果。

Evaluating Quality Indicators of Glioblastoma Care: Audit Results From an Indian Tertiary Care Cancer Center.

作者信息

Basu Achari Rimpa, Chakraborty Santam, Goyal Love, Saha Saheli, Roy Paromita, Zameer Lateef, Mishra Deepak, Parihar Mayur, Das Anirban, Chandra Aditi, Biswas Bivas, Mallick Indranil, Arunsingh Moses A, Chatterjee Sanjoy, Bhattacharyya Tapesh

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.

Department of Oncopathology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Mar;8:e2100405. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00405.

DOI:10.1200/GO.21.00405
PMID:35298293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8955054/
Abstract

PURPOSE

There are limited reports of quality metrics in glioblastoma. We audited our adherence to quality indicators as proposed in the PRIME Quality Improvement study.

METHODS

This is a retrospective audit of patients treated between 2017 and 2020. After postsurgical integrated diagnosis, patients received radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at predefined times guided management. Numbers with proportions for indices were calculated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

One hundred six patients were consecutively treated. The median age was 55 years (interquartile range of 47-61 years) with a male preponderance (68%). Ninety-six (90.6%) patients underwent subtotal resection, and 10 (9.4%) biopsy alone. Isocitrate dehydrogenase was wild-type in 96 (91%), and O-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase was unmethylated in 70 (66.0%) patients. Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter was mutated in 64 (60.4%), and TP53 was mutated in 22 (20.8%). Concurrent radiation and TMZ were planned for 104 (98.1%), and radiation alone for 2 (1.9%). The median time to concurrent RT-TMZ was 36 days (interquartile range 30-44 days). All patients planned for RT-TMZ completed treatment, but only 81 (76%) completed adjuvant TMZ. Sixty-three (59%) completed six cycles, 18 (17%) received less than six cycles, and 25 (24%) did not receive adjuvant TMZ. At a median follow-up of 24 months (range 21-31 months), the median (95% CI) progression-free survival and overall survival were 11 (95% CI, 9.4 to 13.0) and 20.0 (95% CI, 15 to 26) months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our patients met quality indices in most domains; outcomes are comparable with global results. Metrics will be periodically evaluated to include new standards and assess continuous service appropriateness.

摘要

目的

关于胶质母细胞瘤质量指标的报道有限。我们审核了我们对PRIME质量改进研究中提出的质量指标的遵循情况。

方法

这是一项对2017年至2020年期间接受治疗的患者的回顾性审核。术后综合诊断后,患者接受了同步和辅助替莫唑胺(TMZ)的放射治疗(RT)。在预定时间进行的多参数磁共振成像指导治疗。计算了各项指标的数量及比例。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计生存率。

结果

连续治疗了106例患者。中位年龄为55岁(四分位间距为47 - 61岁),男性占优势(68%)。96例(90.6%)患者接受了次全切除,仅10例(9.4%)接受了活检。96例(91%)患者异柠檬酸脱氢酶为野生型,70例(66.0%)患者O-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶未甲基化。64例(60.4%)患者端粒酶逆转录酶启动子发生突变,22例(20.8%)患者TP53发生突变。计划同步放疗和TMZ的有104例(98.1%),仅放疗的有2例(1.9%)。同步RT-TMZ的中位时间为36天(四分位间距30 - 44天)。所有计划接受RT-TMZ的患者均完成了治疗,但只有81例(76%)完成了辅助TMZ治疗。63例(59%)完成了六个周期,18例(17%)接受的周期少于六个,25例(24%)未接受辅助TMZ治疗。中位随访24个月(范围21 - 31个月)时,中位(95%CI)无进展生存期和总生存期分别为11(95%CI,9.4至13.0)个月和20.0(95%CI,15至26)个月。

结论

我们的患者在大多数领域符合质量指标;结果与全球结果相当。将定期评估指标以纳入新标准并评估持续服务的适宜性。