• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在临床环境中评估五种商业 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测方法。

Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.

Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(6):1494-1500. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07448-x. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-022-07448-x
PMID:35301660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8929460/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care antigen tests (AgTs) for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enable the rapid testing of infected individuals and are easy-to-use. However, there are few studies evaluating their clinical use.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical performance characteristics of various commercial SARS-CoV-2 AgTs.

DESIGN

The sensitivity of five AgTs, comprising four rapid antigen tests (RAT; AMP Rapid Test SARS-CoV-2 Ag, NADAL COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test, CLINITEST Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test, and Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test) and one sandwich chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA; LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Assay), were evaluated in 300 nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. Reverse transcriptase (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used as a reference method.

PARTICIPANTS

NP swabs were collected from patients admitted to hospital due to COVID-19.

KEY RESULTS

Sensitivities of the AgTs ranged from 64.9 to 91.7% for samples with RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values lower than 30 and were 100% for cycle threshold (Ct) values lower than 20. The highest sensitivity was observed for CLINITEST Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test, and Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test. Multivariate analysis using time from symptom onset and the Ct value for AgT sensitivity showed an inverse correlation. Further, the female sex was an independent factor of lower RAT sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Antigen tests from NP swab samples show high sensitivity in patients with a Ct value < 20. The best clinical sensitivity can be obtained using AgTs within the first 6 days after symptom onset.

摘要

背景

即时检测抗原试验(AgT)可用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2),便于对感染个体进行快速检测,并且易于使用。然而,目前评估其临床应用的研究较少。

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较各种商业 SARS-CoV-2 AgT 的临床性能特征。

设计

评估了 5 种 AgT 的敏感性,包括 4 种快速抗原检测(RAT;AMP 快速 SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测、NADAL COVID-19 抗原快速检测、CLINITEST 快速 COVID-19 抗原检测和罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测)和 1 种夹心化学发光免疫分析(CLIA;LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 检测),共 300 份鼻咽(NP)拭子。以逆转录(RT)聚合酶链反应(PCR)为参考方法。

参与者

从因 COVID-19 住院的患者中采集 NP 拭子。

主要结果

对于 RT-PCR 循环阈值(Ct)值低于 30 的样本,AgT 的敏感性为 64.9%至 91.7%,对于 Ct 值低于 20 的样本,敏感性为 100%。CLINITEST 快速 COVID-19 抗原检测和罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的敏感性最高。使用 AgT 敏感性的症状出现时间和 Ct 值的多变量分析显示出反比关系。此外,女性是 RAT 敏感性较低的独立因素。

结论

来自 NP 拭子样本的抗原检测在 Ct 值<20 的患者中显示出高敏感性。在症状出现后 6 天内使用 AgT 可获得最佳的临床敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d61/9086068/a33c378f1ab1/11606_2022_7448_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d61/9086068/e437a83ceab6/11606_2022_7448_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d61/9086068/a33c378f1ab1/11606_2022_7448_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d61/9086068/e437a83ceab6/11606_2022_7448_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d61/9086068/a33c378f1ab1/11606_2022_7448_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting.在临床环境中评估五种商业 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(6):1494-1500. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07448-x. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
[Evaluation of the Rapid Antigen Detection Kit with the Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples].[用于呼吸道样本中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的快速抗原检测试剂盒与聚合酶链反应的评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):263-273. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229806.
3
Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test.罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的临床评估。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jan 18;8(3):322-326. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0154. Print 2021 Aug 26.
4
Diagnostic Performance of Six Rapid Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2.六种新型冠状病毒快速抗原检测的诊断性能
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0235121. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02351-21. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Evaluating the field performance of multiple SARS-Cov-2 antigen rapid tests using nasopharyngeal swab samples.评估使用鼻咽拭子样本的多种 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速检测的现场性能。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0262399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262399. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
Comparative performance of SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow antigen tests and association with detection of infectious virus in clinical specimens: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study.SARS-CoV-2 侧向流动抗原检测的比较性能及其与临床标本中传染性病毒检测的关联:一项单中心实验室评估研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Sep;2(9):e461-e471. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00143-9. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
8
Time scale performance of rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2: Evaluation of 10 rapid antigen assays.时间尺度性能的快速抗原检测 SARS-CoV-2:评估 10 种快速抗原检测。
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6512-6518. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27186. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
9
A Multicenter Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy Study of SureStatus, an Affordable, WHO Emergency Use-Listed, Rapid, Point-Of-Care Antigen-Detecting Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2.一项关于 SureStatus 的多中心临床诊断准确性研究,SureStatus 是一种负担得起的、世界卫生组织紧急使用清单上列出的、快速的、即时抗原检测诊断 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断测试。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0122922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01229-22. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
10
Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.核衣壳蛋白抗原快速检测在 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断中的准确性。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):289.e1-289.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.057. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Molecular Biological Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Testing the In Vitro Infectivity of the Virus.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)及测试该病毒体外感染性的分子生物学方法的比较分析
Microorganisms. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):180. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12010180.
2
Evaluation of Four Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection with Nasopharyngeal Swabs.使用鼻咽拭子检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的四种快速抗原检测方法的评估
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 24;11(3):701. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030701.
3
Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study.七种商业化 SARS-CoV-2 快速即时检测抗原试剂盒的比较:一项单中心实验室评估研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jul;2(7):e311-e319. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Performance of an Antigen-Based Test for Asymptomatic and Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Testing at Two University Campuses - Wisconsin, September-October 2020.基于抗原的无症状和有症状 SARS-CoV-2 检测在两个大学校园的表现 - 威斯康星州,2020 年 9 月至 10 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 1;69(5152):1642-1647. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm695152a3.
3
与基于 PCR 的检测相比,对 DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 超快速抗原检测性能的临床评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 17;13(1):4438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8.
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
用于诊断SARS-CoV-2感染的快速即时护理抗原检测和基于分子的检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8(8):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.
4
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Collected Saliva by Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), Direct RT-qPCR, Reverse Transcription-Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, and a Rapid Antigen Test To Diagnose COVID-19.临床评价:定量逆转录实时聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)、直接 RT-qPCR、逆转录环介导等温扩增和快速抗原检测在诊断 COVID-19 中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Aug 24;58(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01438-20.
5
Throat-Wash Testing and Coronavirus Disease 2019: Should We Put Our Money Where Our Mouth Is?咽喉冲洗检测与2019冠状病毒病:我们是否应该言行一致?
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 5;71(8):1982-1983. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa511.
6
Viral RNA load as determined by cell culture as a management tool for discharge of SARS-CoV-2 patients from infectious disease wards.通过细胞培养测定病毒 RNA 载量作为管理工具,以将 SARS-CoV-2 患者从传染病病房中出院。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;39(6):1059-1061. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03913-9. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study.中国武汉严重 COVID-19 患者的临床病程和结局:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.实时 RT-PCR 检测 2019 新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.