• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 OCD 和健康对照组相比,不确定容忍度、焦虑敏感性和痛苦容忍度在囤积障碍中的作用。

The roles of intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety sensitivity and distress tolerance in hoarding disorder compared with OCD and healthy controls.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Department of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2022 Jul;50(4):392-403. doi: 10.1017/S1352465822000108. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1017/S1352465822000108
PMID:35301971
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is suggested that the different psychological vulnerability factors of intolerance of uncertainty (IU), anxiety sensitivity (AS) and distress tolerance (DT) may be in important in hoarding disorder (HD). However, the extent to which these factors are specific to HD compared with other disorders remains unclear.

AIMS

The current study aimed to investigate differences in IU, AS and DT in three groups: HD (=66), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD; =59) and healthy controls (HCs; =63).

METHOD

Participants completed an online battery of standardised self-report measures to establish the independent variable of group membership (HD, OCD and HC) and the dependent variables (IU, AS and DT).

RESULTS

A MANOVA analysis indicated statistically significant differences in IU, AS and DT between the clinical groups and HCs. Follow-up analyses showed no statistically significant differences between the HD and OCD group for any of the three constructs. The results remained the same when examining the effects of co-morbid HD and OCD. An unexpected finding was the trend for IU, AS and DT to be more severe when HD and OCD were co-morbid.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests the absence of a specific relationship between IU, AS or DT in HD and instead is consistent with existing research which suggests that these psychological vulnerability factors are transdiagnostic constructs across anxiety disorders. The implications of the findings are discussed.

摘要

背景

有研究表明,无法容忍不确定性(IU)、焦虑敏感(AS)和痛苦耐受力(DT)的不同心理脆弱因素在囤积障碍(HD)中可能很重要。然而,这些因素与 HD 相比在其他障碍中具有特异性的程度尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在调查三组之间 IU、AS 和 DT 的差异:HD(=66)、强迫症(OCD;=59)和健康对照组(HCs;=63)。

方法

参与者完成了一系列在线标准化自我报告测试,以确定组别的独立变量(HD、OCD 和 HC)和因变量(IU、AS 和 DT)。

结果

MANOVA 分析表明,在 IU、AS 和 DT 方面,临床组与 HCs 之间存在统计学上的显著差异。后续分析表明,在这三个构念中,HD 和 OCD 组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。当检查 HD 和 OCD 的共病效应对结果的影响时,结果仍然相同。一个意外的发现是,当 HD 和 OCD 共病时,IU、AS 和 DT 更严重的趋势。

结论

这些证据表明,在 HD 中,IU、AS 或 DT 之间没有特定的关系,而是与现有的研究一致,即这些心理脆弱因素是跨焦虑障碍的共病构念。讨论了研究结果的意义。

相似文献

1
The roles of intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety sensitivity and distress tolerance in hoarding disorder compared with OCD and healthy controls.与 OCD 和健康对照组相比,不确定容忍度、焦虑敏感性和痛苦容忍度在囤积障碍中的作用。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2022 Jul;50(4):392-403. doi: 10.1017/S1352465822000108. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
An investigation of the role of intolerance of uncertainty in hoarding symptoms.囤积症状中不确定性不耐受作用的调查。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 15;193:208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.047. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
3
Distress tolerance in OCD and anxiety disorders, and its relationship with anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty.强迫症和焦虑障碍中的困扰容忍度,及其与焦虑敏感性和不确定性容忍度的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2015 Jun;33:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
4
The role of distress tolerance, anxiety sensitivity, and intolerance of uncertainty in predicting hoarding symptoms in a clinical sample.在一个临床样本中,苦恼容受性、焦虑敏感性和不确定性容忍度在预测囤积症状中的作用。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.084. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
An examination of the role of intolerance of distress and uncertainty in hoarding symptoms.考察无法忍受困扰和不确定性在囤积症状中的作用。
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;72:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Co-occurring Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Hoarding Disorder: A Review of the Current Literature.共病强迫症和囤积症:当前文献综述。
J Cogn Psychother. 2022 Nov 1;36(4):271-286. doi: 10.1891/jcp-2021-0010. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
7
A contemporary psychometric evaluation of the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R).强迫症量表修订版(OCI-R)的当代心理测量评估。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):874-82. doi: 10.1037/pas0000075. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
8
Hoarding disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder show different patterns of neural activity during response inhibition.囤积症和强迫症在反应抑制期间表现出不同的神经活动模式。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Feb 28;221(2):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
9
Do they really care? Specificity of social support issues in hoarding disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder.他们真的在意吗?囤积障碍和强迫症中社会支持问题的特异性。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2023 Sep;62(3):573-591. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12426. Epub 2023 May 12.
10
Value-based decision making under uncertainty in hoarding and obsessive- compulsive disorders.在囤积症和强迫症中基于价值的不确定性决策。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:305-315. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.058. Epub 2017 Aug 24.