微生物快速现场评估：一种更好的方法用于支气管扩张症患者中粘液化脓性铜绿假单胞菌的诊断。
Microbiology rapid on-site evaluation: a better method for Mucoid Pseudomonas Aeruginosa diagnosis in bronchiectasic patients.
机构信息
Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Third Affliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
出版信息
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Mar;26(5):1738-1742. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202203_28243.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to find an accurate and fast method to diagnose the pathogen of bronchiectasis.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Ten bronchiectasic patients diagnosed with Mucoid Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (MPA) in the past two years were analyzed. Accuracy and time were compared between microbiology rapid on-site evaluation (M-ROSE) and sputum bacterial culture.
RESULTS
The accuracy rate of M-ROSE in the patients is 100% consistent with bacterial culture results. The average time of M-ROSE is about 4.3 min, which is over 1000 times shorter than that of sputum bacterial culture.
CONCLUSIONS
M-ROSE may be a better method for etiological diagnosis of MPA.
目的
本研究旨在寻找一种准确、快速的方法来诊断支气管扩张症的病原体。
患者与方法
分析了过去两年中被诊断为粘液化脓性铜绿假单胞菌（MPA）的 10 例支气管扩张症患者。比较了微生物快速现场评估（M-ROSE）和痰细菌培养在准确性和时间方面的差异。
结果
M-ROSE 在这些患者中的准确率与细菌培养结果完全一致。M-ROSE 的平均时间约为 4.3 分钟，比痰细菌培养短了 1000 多倍。
结论
M-ROSE 可能是 MPA 病因诊断的较好方法。
Zotero 插件