Alexander A I, Mercer R J, Lie T H, Letchford D, Bennett R C
Aust N Z J Surg. 1986 Aug;56(8):651-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1986.tb04522.x.
Replicate assays of oestrogen receptor (ER) concentration on 81 specimens of human breast carcinoma were performed to compare the ligand binding Sephadex separation method with a polystyrene bead linked anti-oestrogen receptor monoclonal antibody technique (enzyme immunoassay [EIA], Abbott Laboratories). Each specimen was homogenized and the cytosol divided into four fractions. Replicate assays by each method gave an estimate of reproducibility. The mean CV (coefficient of variation = standard deviation/mean) for the ligand binding method was 9.73% compared with a mean CV of 17.9% for the EIA method. In the clinically significant range of ER values, around the cut-off point between negative and positive assays, there was no difference in the precision of the two assays (Mann Whitney U-test). The correlation between methods gave a Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (r value) of 0.822, significant at the P less than 0.001 level, indicating a close correlation between the two methods. The highest CVs for both methods were in the range of oestrogen receptor concentrations, below 10 fmol/mg cytosol protein. Using 10 fmol/mg cytosol protein as a cut-off between negative and positive assays, 9.87% of the specimens would be reclassified as either positive or negative by the new assay method. The new assay method is, therefore, acceptable for clinical use.
对81例人类乳腺癌标本进行雌激素受体(ER)浓度的重复检测,以比较配体结合葡聚糖凝胶分离法与聚苯乙烯珠联抗雌激素受体单克隆抗体技术(酶免疫测定法[EIA],雅培实验室)。将每个标本匀浆,其胞质溶胶分为四个部分。每种方法的重复检测给出了再现性的估计值。配体结合法的平均变异系数(变异系数=标准差/平均值)为9.73%,而EIA法的平均变异系数为17.9%。在ER值具有临床意义的范围内,即在阴性和阳性检测的分界点附近,两种检测方法的精密度没有差异(曼-惠特尼U检验)。两种方法之间的相关性给出了皮尔逊积矩相关系数(r值)为0.822,在P小于0.001水平上具有显著性,表明两种方法之间存在密切相关性。两种方法的最高变异系数都在雌激素受体浓度范围,即低于10 fmol/mg胞质溶胶蛋白。以10 fmol/mg胞质溶胶蛋白作为阴性和阳性检测的分界点,新检测方法会使9.87%的标本重新分类为阳性或阴性。因此,新检测方法可用于临床。