Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 31;23(2):141-144. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.9.53014.
Telehealth is commonly used to connect emergency department (ED) patients with specialists or resources required for their care. Its infrastructure requires substantial upfront and ongoing investment from an ED or hospital and may be more difficult to implement in lower-resourced settings. Our aim was to examine for an association between ED payer mix and receipt of telehealth services.
Using data from the National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)-USA 2016 survey, we categorized EDs based on receipt of telehealth services (yes/no). The NEDI-USA data for EDs in New York state was linked with data from state ED datasets (SEDD) and state inpatient data (SID) to determine EDs' payer mix (percent self-pay or Medicaid). Other ED characteristics of interest were rural location, academic status, and annual ED visit volume. We compared EDs with and without telehealth receipt, and used a logistic regression model to examine the relationship between ED payer mix and telehealth receipt after accounting for other ED characteristics.
Of the 162 New York EDs in the SEDD-SID dataset, 160 (99%) were linked to the NEDI-USA dataset and 133 of those responded (83%) to the survey. Telehealth receipt was reported by 48 EDs (36%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 28-44%). Emergency departments with and without telehealth receipt were similar (all P >0.40) with respect to rurality (6% vs 9%, respectively), academic status (13% vs 8%), and annual volume (median 36,728 vs 43,000). By contrast, median percent of Medicaid or self-pay patients was lower in telehealth EDs (36%) vs non-telehealth EDs (45%, P = 0.02). In adjusted analysis, increasing proportion of Medicaid and self-pay patients was associated with decreased odds of telehealth receipt (odds ratio 0.87 per 5% increase; 95% CI, 0.77-0.99). Rural location, academic status, and ED volume were not significantly associated with odds of ED telehealth receipt in the adjusted model.
Among EDs in the state of New York, increasing proportion of self-pay and Medicaid patients was associated with decreased odds of ED telehealth receipt, even after accounting for rural location, academic status, and ED volume. The findings support the need for additional infrastructural investment in EDs serving a greater proportion of disadvantaged patients to ensure equitable access.
远程医疗常用于将急诊科(ED)患者与专科医生或其所需资源联系起来。其基础设施需要 ED 或医院进行大量前期和持续投资,并且在资源较少的环境中可能更难实施。我们的目的是研究 ED 支付方组合与远程医疗服务获得之间是否存在关联。
我们使用 2016 年国家急诊科库存(NEDI-US)调查的数据,根据是否获得远程医疗服务(是/否)对 ED 进行分类。将纽约州 NEDI-US 数据与州急诊科数据集(SEDD)和州住院数据(SID)链接,以确定 ED 的支付方组合(自付或 Medicaid 占比)。其他感兴趣的 ED 特征包括农村地区、学术地位和每年 ED 就诊量。我们比较了有无远程医疗服务的 ED,并在考虑其他 ED 特征后,使用逻辑回归模型检查 ED 支付方组合与远程医疗服务获得之间的关系。
在 SEDD-SID 数据集中的 162 家纽约 ED 中,有 160 家(99%)与 NEDI-US 数据集相关联,其中 133 家对调查做出了回应(83%)。有 48 家 ED(36%,95%置信区间[CI],28-44%)报告了远程医疗服务的使用情况。有无远程医疗服务的 ED 在农村地区(分别为 6%和 9%)、学术地位(分别为 13%和 8%)和年就诊量(中位数分别为 36728 和 43000)方面相似(所有 P>0.40)。相比之下,远程医疗 ED 的 Medicaid 或自付患者比例(36%)低于非远程医疗 ED(45%,P=0.02)。在调整分析中, Medicaid 和自付患者比例的增加与远程医疗服务使用的可能性降低相关(每增加 5%,比值比为 0.87;95%CI,0.77-0.99)。农村地区、学术地位和 ED 量在调整后的模型中与 ED 远程医疗服务使用的可能性无显著关联。
在纽约州的 ED 中, Medicaid 和自付患者比例的增加与 ED 远程医疗服务使用的可能性降低相关,即使考虑到农村地区、学术地位和 ED 量也是如此。研究结果支持需要对服务更多弱势群体患者的 ED 进行额外的基础设施投资,以确保公平获得服务。