Suppr超能文献

《燃起的火焰:带丙烯酸指甲的电灼切开关节下血肿的安全性》

Up in Flames: The Safety of Electrocautery Trephination of Subungual Hematomas with Acrylic Nails.

机构信息

Madigan Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington.

Evans Army Community Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fort Carson, Colorado.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb 23;23(2):183-185. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.10.53567.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Subungual hematomas are fingertip injuries, generally secondary to blunt trauma, that cause pain due to an accumulation of blood under the fingernail. It is generally considered standard of practice to relieve this accumulation by means of trephination with a hollow tip needle, a heated paper clip, or electrocautery. It has been assumed that due to the flammable properties of acrylic, trephination via electrocautery has the potential to ignite acrylic nails and cause burns and other potentially serious injury, making electrocautery contraindicated in patients with acrylic nails. Our thorough literature review failed to support or refute this assumption; so in the interest of ensuring that this practice is evidence-based, we sought to explore this topic.

METHODS

In this study we used electrocautery trephination on acrylic nail products attached to simulated digits and recorded the presence and frequency of ignition events. We hypothesized that ignition would occur with sufficient frequency to support continuing the practice of avoiding electrocautery trephination in subungual hematomas with overlying acrylic nails.

RESULTS

In our study, we exposed 200 acrylic nails to trephination with electrocautery, and 83 nails ignited (41.5%).

CONCLUSION

While other variables exist, these findings do support the current practice pattern of avoiding trephination with electrocautery in those patients with acrylic nails overlying subungual hematomas.

摘要

简介

甲下血肿是指尖损伤,通常继发于钝性创伤,由于指甲下积聚血液而引起疼痛。通常认为,通过空心针尖针、加热的回形针或电烙术来缓解这种积聚是标准的治疗方法。由于丙烯酸具有易燃性,人们一直认为用电烙术进行钻孔有可能点燃丙烯酸指甲,导致烧伤和其他潜在的严重伤害,因此在有丙烯酸指甲的患者中电烙术被视为禁忌。我们对文献进行了全面回顾,未能支持或反驳这一假设;因此,为了确保这种做法是基于证据的,我们试图探讨这个问题。

方法

在这项研究中,我们用电烙术对附着在模拟手指上的丙烯酸指甲产品进行钻孔,并记录点火事件的存在和频率。我们假设点火会发生得足够频繁,足以支持继续避免在甲下血肿上有电烙术钻孔的做法,而这些血肿上有丙烯酸指甲覆盖。

结果

在我们的研究中,我们用电烙术对 200 个丙烯酸指甲进行了钻孔,其中 83 个指甲点燃(41.5%)。

结论

虽然存在其他变量,但这些发现确实支持了目前的治疗模式,即在有丙烯酸指甲覆盖的甲下血肿患者中避免用电烙术钻孔。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e5/8967465/576531cf2869/wjem-23-184-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验