From the Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island (KJK, WC, OAP, MRB, GPA, EMB); Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (DP); Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Albert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (RKA); Orthopedic Program in Clinical/Translational Research, Warren Albert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (RKA); Miriam Hospital Total Joint Replacement Center, Providence, Rhode Island (RKA); and Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (LMT).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jan 1;102(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002007. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
We sought to determine the comparative benefits and harms of rehabilitation interventions for patients who have undergone elective, unilateral THA surgery for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis. We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2005, through May 3, 2021. We included randomized controlled trials and adequately adjusted nonrandomized comparative studies of rehabilitation programs reporting performance-based, patient-reported, or healthcare utilization outcomes. Three researchers extracted study data and assessed risk of bias, verified by an independent researcher. Experts in rehabilitation content and complex interventions independently coded rehabilitation interventions. The team assessed strength of evidence. Large heterogeneity across evaluated rehabilitation programs limited conclusions. Evidence from 15 studies suggests that diverse rehabilitation programs may not differ in terms of risk of harm or outcomes of pain, strength, activities of daily living, or quality of life (all low strength of evidence). Evidence is insufficient for other outcomes. In conclusion, no differences in outcomes were found between different rehabilitation programs after THA. Further evidence is needed to inform decisions on what attributes of rehabilitation programs are most effective for various outcomes.
我们旨在确定接受择期单侧全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗原发性骨关节炎的患者接受康复干预的相对益处和危害。我们检索了 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 3 日期间的 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 临床试验注册中心、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 ClinicalTrials.gov。我们纳入了报告基于表现、患者报告或医疗保健利用结果的康复计划的随机对照试验和充分调整的非随机对照研究。三名研究人员提取了研究数据,并由独立研究人员进行了偏倚风险评估。康复内容和复杂干预方面的专家独立对康复干预措施进行编码。该团队评估了证据的力度。评估的康复项目之间存在很大的异质性,限制了结论的得出。来自 15 项研究的证据表明,不同的康复项目在危害或疼痛、力量、日常生活活动或生活质量(所有低证据强度)等方面的结果可能没有差异。对于其他结果,证据不足。总之,THA 后不同康复项目的结果没有差异。需要进一步的证据来确定哪些康复项目的属性对各种结果最有效。